|
|
We're not using Core
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I know - that's why I suggested RazorGenerator.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I installed it and finally figured out how to get it working (the docs aren't exactly forthcoming - or complete).
In any case, it looks like this is my only choice if I want to try doing what I need, so I 5'd you., Thanks for the info. 
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I am dismayed to find no tangible examples of its usage - nothing but casual mentions of what people did to make it work.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there:
I have to debug two branches of the same codebase side-by-side (a development branch vs a release branch), as we're seeing unexplained differences in behaviour between them. I've opened two copies of VS 2019 (latest patch v18.6.3 at 16th Dec 2020), and when launching them, one will succeed, and the other will throw up an error message:
One or more errors occurred.
Failed to launch the debug adapter. Additional information be be available in the output window.
Cannot connect to runtime process, timeout after 10000 ms - (reason: Cannot connect to the target: connect ECONNREFUSED 127.0.0.1:4318).
What I've tried:
- Making sure that each web project is set to start on a unique port number, I've selected 53199 for one branch and 53200 for another.
- Delete the applicationhost.config inside .vs, restart VS and let it recreate.
What I've noticed:
- The two Visual Studios try to launch as tabs in the SAME Chrome instance. I loaded a random different project from another codebase and that project launched its own new Chrome instance.
- Inside each applicationhost.config, in the <sites> section, BOTH projects have:
<site name="foo.Web" id="2">
- Their site "id" is the same, but each config file does have the correct virtualdirectorypath for its project location.
- this is new behaviour (maybe a new bug?) and I've been able to run this configuration plenty of times in the past.
- the output window contains only this:
Verbose logs are written to:
C:\Users\Bar\AppData\Local\Temp\visualstudio-js-debugger.txt
The program '' has exited with code -1 (0xffffffff).
The program '[21072] iisexpress.exe' has exited with code 0 (0x0).
- as each site starts up, the visual studio debugger log shows a --remote-debugging-port which is unique for each site, so no conflict there...
Since we're using TFS version control, "two branches" in this context means two completely different folders on disk, each with a full copy of the project source inside. I cannot see why these projects interfere with each other. Each one launches into debug successfully on its own and then the other won't launch.
Can I "fool" VS / IIS Express by manually changing the site "id" or "name" in applicationhost.config?
Any help gratefully appreciated!
-- edit: there are workarounds, e.g. using two different browsers, but still would like to clarify whether it's me or VS or IIS express causing this, and whether it can be fixed!
|
|
|
|
|
You could always just set them up as their own sites in IIS and attach the debugger of each instance of VS to the relevant site. I'm pretty sure what you're trying should work anyway so don't know if there is something odd going on with your project structure or what the sites are doing. I'd try the IIS route though as I know that definitely works.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to diagnose an issue with a mod I wrote.
So I start with $rs2 = -1, then I increment $rs2, but when I print $res2 in the table cell, $rs2 goes ...
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
I thought since $rs2 is the origin number to feed into mod, that the number should increment.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
It's works on the other function with the same mechanics here. Just not this one.
I haven't worked PHP since 2005, so I'm a bit rusty.
$rs2++;
$stripe2 = ($rs2 % 2 == 0) ? "rowStripe" : "";
echo "
<tr>
<td class='report-table-body-20 $stripe2'>
<p class='report-table-body-p'> $rs2 $equip_cat_name</p>
If it ain't broke don't fix it
Discover my world at jkirkerx.com
|
|
|
|
|
I was in a double while loop.
And incremented in the 2nd internal while, my bad!
If it ain't broke don't fix it
Discover my world at jkirkerx.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, that's a good idea
If it ain't broke don't fix it
Discover my world at jkirkerx.com
|
|
|
|
|
Hello good, I have a query, what happens is that I want to enter user roles in my code but I don't know how to do it, I have the registration and login form already created, I just need to add the reference that I already mentioned above:
register_user_be.php:
<?php
include 'conexion_be.php';
$nombre_completo = $_POST['nombre_completo'];
$correo = $_POST['correo'];
$usuario = $_POST['usuario'];
$contrasena = $_POST['contrasena'];
$contrasena = hash('sha512', $contrasena);
$query = "INSERT INTO usuarios(nombre_completo, correo, usuario, contrasena)
VALUES('$nombre_completo', '$correo', '$usuario', '$contrasena')";
$verificar_correo = mysqli_query($conexion, "SELECT * FROM usuarios WHERE correo='$correo' ");
if (mysqli_num_rows($verificar_correo) > 0) {
echo '
<script>
alert("Este correo ya está registrado");
window.location = "../index.php";
</script>
';
exit();
}
$verificar_usuario = mysqli_query($conexion, "SELECT * FROM usuarios WHERE usuario='$usuario' ");
if (mysqli_num_rows($verificar_usuario) > 0) {
echo '
<script>
alert("Este usuario ya está registrado");
window.location = "../index.php";
</script>
';
exit();
}
$ejecutar = mysqli_query($conexion, $query);
if ($ejecutar) {
echo '<script>
alert("Usuario registrado correctamente");
window.location = "../index.php";
</script>';
}else{
echo '<script>
alert("Inténtalo de nuevo, usuario no registrado");
window.location = "../index.php";
</script>';
}
mysqli_close($conexion);
?>
login_usuario_be.php:
<?php
session_start();
include 'conexion_be.php';
$correo = $_POST['correo'];
$contrasena = $_POST['contrasena'];
$contrasena = hash('sha512', $contrasena);
$validar_login = mysqli_query($conexion, "SELECT * FROM usuarios where correo='$correo' and contrasena='$contrasena'");
if (mysqli_num_rows($validar_login) > 0) {
$_SESSION['usuario'] = $correo;
header("location: ../inicio.php");
exit;
}else{
echo '
<script>
alert("El usuario no existe, por favor verifique los datos introducidos");
window.location = "../index.php";
</script>
';
exit;
}
?>
index.php:
<?php
session_start();
if (isset($_SESSION['usuario'])) {
header("location: inicio.php");
}
?>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="es">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<title>Iniciar Sesión</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="assets/css/estilos.css">
</head>
<body>
<main>
<div class="contenedor__todo">
<div class="caja__trasera">
<div class="caja__trasera-login">
<h3>¿Ya tienes una cuenta?</h3>
<p>Inicia sesión para entrar a la página</p>
<button id="btn__iniciar-sesion">Iniciar sesión</button>
</div>
<div class="caja__trasera-register">
<h3>¿Aún no tienes una cuenta?</h3>
<p>Regístrate para que puedas iniciar sesión</p>
<button id="btn__registrarse">Regístrate</button>
</div>
</div>
<!--
<div class="contenedor__login-register">
<!--
<form action="php/login_usuario_be.php" method="POST" class="formulario__login">
<h2>Iniciar sesión</h2>
<input type="text" placeholder="Correo electrónico" name="correo">
<input type="password" placeholder="Contraseña" name="contrasena">
<button>Entrar</button>
</form>
<!--
<form action="php/registro_usuario_be.php" method="POST" class="formulario__register">
<h2>Regístrarse</h2>
<input type="text" placeholder="Nombre Completo" name="nombre_completo">
<input type="text" placeholder="Correo Electrónico" name="correo">
<input type="text" placeholder="Usuario" name="usuario">
<input type="password" placeholder="Contraseña" name="contrasena">
<button>Regístrarse</button>
</form>
</div>
</div>
</main>
<script src="assets/js/script.js"></script>
</body>
</html
modified 17-Nov-20 3:47am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't really want to "maintain a web site" but I want to expose some computing functionality for a hobby of mine.
Excel is driving me to tears.... So I am thinking perhaps I could have a single page static SPA!
But most web tech drive me to tears, me think would be nice do a Blazor SPA! Is it possible?
One with 0 server side setup! That I can just drop on web app folder somewhere?
Any links? tutorials?
|
|
|
|
|
hi all,
I am going to build an asp.net core website and an asp.net core webapi. My question is that from design perspective, should I just call into the webapi to get data for my website? or just call into the database to get data directly?
It looks like calling the webapi would promote separation of concerns and I don't have to expose my database connection strings in multiple places, but I am afraid there is a performance hit that will impact the performance of the load time of the website.
Any insight is greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: My question is that from design perspective, should I just call into the webapi to get data for my website? or just call into the database to get data directly?
This is a preference-based and a scenario-based question. In my own application that I have, I am redirecting all the database related stuff through API, and this has decreased the attack surface a lot (I can secure the database requests at one place).
Also, if you route all the database traffic to ASP.NET Core Web API, you can develop the frontend independently—in future you can replace ASP.NET Core MVC with something like a React or Angular framework for frontend, and you can easily integrate the application in a mobile application; native, Xamarin or Flutter.
Quote: It looks like calling the webapi would promote separation of concerns
Correct, like I said earlier.
Quote: I don't have to expose my database connection strings in multiple places
Yes, and no. You still can prevent exposing the database connection string by using variables on your hosting environment and then reuse that value in all your processes. This part depends entirely on where you are hosting your application.
Quote: but I am afraid there is a performance hit that will impact the performance of the load time of the website.
No, do not worry about this part.
If you create two applications, you are going to launch them separately and that can add 3-5 seconds of load time, but it would be much easier to scale the applications in the future. This will help you in handling the load like a pro.
Also, load time depends on how many users are you expecting to get? If there will be a lot of users (like thousands of active users) then try caching your website and the queries, so you do not send duplicate queries to the database for at least an hour.
Here are a few more ideas to improve the performance:
- Deploy your application as a stateless instance (try to move all the memory and state, e.g. session information to a database)
- Add a caching layer to your service
- Try to add scaling to your website (depends on the host environment)
- If you scale a stateless website, you can utilize caching and database to handle more requests and provide service to more users
- Keep separating the different domains inside your application to their own services (Microservice pattern)
I hope this helps you understand the bigger picture.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Afzaal, this is very insightful and answer most of my concerns. your ideas to improve performance aligned with what we had in mind except for number 1 that I am not sure if I understand.
Did you mean that I will need to make database calls through the webapi to get the session state, like if I have a survey engine, I will have to post every question that the user answer so he or she can come back to it later? if not, Can you give a brief example what you have in mind?
Thanks and greatly appreciate your help.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Did you mean that I will need to make database calls through the webapi to get the session state,
Not specifically, but just outproc the session and other "state" information.
Take a look at this for inspiration: ASP NET Core MVC - How to configure Out of Process Session State? - Stack Overflow
Quote: if I have a survey engine, I will have to post every question that the user answer so he or she can come back to it later?
Correct, so that none of the information is stored only in the ASP.NET Core process. This can help you scale the application as well, since your users are not stuck with using a specific process and load balancer can easily balance the traffic regardless of the survey state.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
the post about out of process session state is interesting. still need time to digust the topic as I am not familar with it at all. I believe I have a basic idea how to go about doing this now. thanks again for the help!
|
|
|
|
|
You should separate the database code from the controllers and views. I created a database class implementing an interface that is passed to the controllers, providing methods to obtain the required data from the database. Thus there is a minimal common interface between the web site and the database code, and the web site knows nothing about the database. This allows testing of the database code with a desktop test harness. It also allows easy replacement of the database code if for example I change database provider.
I used Dapper for database access, but PetaPoco is better IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
hi Leif Simon Goodwin,
Yes, I believe that calling into an webapi is better in terms of separation of concern, and I have started doing that for my project. I've never heard of petapoco before and it looks interesting. I am just using good old ADO.NET using queries and loading data to POCOs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I used to use Entity Framework. Everything seemed to work well enough to get me hooked, until there are more complicated examples, such as pull fields from different tables using a stored procedure and try to update the fields in the object afterwards, that will get me all the time ...
|
|
|
|
|
hi all,
I am going to build an asp.net core website and an asp.net core webapi. My question is that from design perspective, should I just call into the webapi to get data for my website? or just call into the database to get data directly?
It looks like calling the webapi would promote separation of concerns and I don't have to expose my database connection strings in multiple places, but I am afraid there is a performance hit that will impact the performance of the load time of the website.
Any insight is greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
I am new to PHP programming and I am trying to teach myself WordPress theme development for fun and I am using PhpStorm as my IDE.
I am trying to better understand the inner-workings of WordPress and I am running into a roadblock on something.
I have a sandbox plugin that I created to use to play around with WordPress.
In my wp-content/plugins/sandbox/sandbox.php file, I am just running basic PHP code to help me get used to the language as it relates to WordPress.
Also, I installed both Kint and Whoops using Composer to help with debugging.
Now that I got that out of the way, here is what I am doing:
Code #1
namespace MyDevPlayground\Sandbox;
add_action( 'loop_start', __NAMESPACE__ . '\process_the_string' );
function process_the_string() {
$current_user = wp_get_current_user();
$data_packet = array(
'id' => $current_user->ID,
'email' => $current_user->user_email,
'name' => array(
'first_name' => $current_user->user_firstname,
'last_name' => $current_user->user_lastname,
),
);
render_user_message( $data_packet );
}
function render_user_message( array $current_user ) {
$user_id = $current_user['id'];
d( "Welcome {$current_user['name']['first_name']}, your user id is { {$user_id} }." );
ddd( "Welcome {$current_user['name']['first_name']}, your user id is {$user_id}." );
}
When I run Code #1 above everything is fine and Kint displays the values just fine.
Now for the problem I am having that I don’t understand about WordPress:
Code #2
<pre lang="PHP">namespace MyDevPlayground\Sandbox;
add_action( 'loop_start', __NAMESPACE__ . '\check_logged_in_user' );
function check_logged_in_user(){
$current_user = wp_get_current_user();
if ( 0 == $current_user->ID ) {
d('Not logged in');
} else {
ddd('Logged in');
}
}
check_logged_in_user();
When I run Code #2 above, Whoops reports the following error:
Call to undefined function MyDevPlaygroundSandbox\wp_get_current_user
For some reason when I run Code #1, the wp_get_current_user() function loads just fine, but not with Code #2.
Can someone help me understand why this is in laymen’s terms if possible?
What is the difference between Code #1 and Code #2?
How come the wp_get_current_user() function is not loading in Code #2, but it is in Code #1?
Thank you for your help.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
