|
I had to uninstall my network devices and reinstall them. 
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
really? I didn't.
I just rebooted my machine. my internet routers and switches were fine.
|
|
|
|
|
My actual physical devices were fine. But I had to - for example with my wifi widget - uninstall the drivers for the thing, unplug it (it's USB) and plug it back in before windows would use it properly.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: I had to uninstall my network devices and reinstall them
Ugh. I just read some article (linked to from CP's Daily News email, I believe) about some urgent fix in the TCP stack. As I'm writing this I have a number of machines waiting on me for a reboot. Now you have me worried. 
|
|
|
|
|
Oh man.. That's probably what happened to me. It was all my network devices. Good luck!
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
What's a Windows update?
I've disabled mine so long ago I don't remember what they look like. 
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: What's a Windows update?
I've disabled mine so long ago I don't remember what they look like
I'm a long time fan of your contributions to CP Marc, and I have waaaay too much respect for you to send what would otherwise be a snarky response to that sort of statement.
I'm sure you have your security situation under control and are being smart about it. More power to you.
|
|
|
|
|
I've never suffered anything this nasty. Maybe it's luck, but then again I probably have a much simpler setup than yours.
What has happened--more than once--is DNS query issues that totally turtled internet access. One of them had to do with an IPv6 setting. I had to search for solutions and don't even remember for sure if the fault lay with Microsoft. I also recall that another one was short-lived and was magically fixed by installing a pending update.
|
|
|
|
|
My setup is a factory install of windows home edition with visual studio and VS code on it, plus a VM for running linux.
All my hardware is factory except the video card.
This machine was new as of the end of january - that's when i unboxed it.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: that's when i unboxed it.
Well, there's your problem right there!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't build them myself (at least not entirely) anymore. The reason is, these days it's cheaper to get a good "bare-bones" (read: without a graphics card) "gaming" system and use it as a fast dev workstation.
It's got the ram. it's got the nvme, and the nice chipset and motherboard, quality components, etc. But I would have paid another $300 on top of the $1200 i paid if i would have built it myself.
I honestly don't think it was my hardware. Most of it is ASUS (the mobo and WiFi adapter - and they shipped together so were likely tested together - better than what i could build anyway) and the rest is also good models of good brands.
The most suspect player in this equation, particularly since it happened right after an update, is Microsoft.
And if they didn't test their update with my standard WHQL tested hardware and that's why it failed? It's *still* their fault.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: My setup is a factory install of windows home edition with visual studio and VS code on it, plus a VM for running linux
Win10 Home lets you run VMs?
Wait. I'm thinking Hyper-V. So, you're using a third-party.
Carry on.
|
|
|
|
|
I use VMWare Player. It's not fancy, but it's reliable, and it even got my old linux hard drive I yanked out of a dying machine to boot in the VM.
So yeah, can recommend. It's an excellent free tool.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Used to be a fan of theirs (I was introduced to the world of VMs with their Workstation product) until their prices kept going up and up. My employer could justify it, but not myself, especially after MS had started bundling Hyper-V right into Windows.
I've never looked into Player. If Hyper-V gave me a reason to look elsewhere (and so far it hasn't), it would be at the top of the list. I refuse to deal with VirtualBox, which is owned by that other hellspawn company.
|
|
|
|
|
VirtualBox is garbage. It doesn't even carry USB through properly at least when running on a linux host OS, virtualizing windows.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Good to know. I never even tried it.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: I guess I could come crawling back to apple after almost 35 years of avoiding them.
Ask yourself: Should you buy into the promise the grass is greener...?
|
|
|
|
|
It's not so much about trust as it is exhausting all of my options. 
I mean, can it really do worse to me than Linux has? (Operating system not found after an update - fairly consistently to the point where i got used to manually patching the MBR after every update)
I almost certainly won't do it, but the fact that I've been driven to the point where it even occurred to me is more than a little disappointing.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: can it really do worse to me than Linux has? (Operating system not found after an update - fairly consistently to the point where i got used to manually patching the MBR after every update)
I've been bitten by this one on more than one occasion, and for the most part, my Linux instances are all running as VMs - what should, by now, be a well-known virtualized configuration, and not on bare metal, which means a lot of the unknown/strange/uncommon hardware is removed from the equation. How updates can still mess that up is puzzling to say the least.
honey the codewitch wrote: I almost certainly won't do it, but the fact that I've been driven to the point where it even occurred to me is more than a little disappointing.
I'd still take their hardware, I just refuse to give them any money for it. AKA, my justification for owning a used MacBook laptop.
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is choosing a host OS. That's my issue. I've also considered Windows 7
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
While I still like 7, with its lack of updates, it's becoming a liability.
My VM host is Server 2012 R2, which I got through my MSDN subscription. I'm still a little too uneasy with Linux to rely on it to host my VMs, which I need to "just work" for work and beyond.
|
|
|
|
|
For starters I'm 25 and I want to be a software developer. The issue is though is that I got arrested a few years ago and long story short it didn't result in a conviction and the arrest got expunged. Since then despite the outcomes I've been very skeptical about getting a software job. I've been looking to go the freelancing route but I only know python and I'm still trying to build up a portfolio. Is freelancing worth it?
|
|
|
|
|
Freelancing has many benefits and drawbacks, so it is not easy to say whether it is the right choice for you. Your personal history is irrelevant to your decision unless it has a direct bearing on your ability to work. The most important thing to start with is that you have good solid experience in multiple languages and frameworks, as you have to go where the work is. With only some Python experience I think you may struggle to find work. It may be an idea to talk to recruitment agencies in your locality to see what skills are in demand and whether freelance work is called for.
|
|
|
|
|
If it got expunged and there was no conviction what's the problem? Just don't mention it on your resume, and if your prospective employer gives you an application they aren't planning on your being a coder for them - you'll be cleaning the office. So there's no box to check about whether you've been arrested before or not (and even if there was you could avoid checking it on the basis of it being expunged)
I'm a freelancer. It would be a pretty bad idea to try to learn the ropes while freelancing. Spend some years working for a dev house or two so you can learn how to do this professionally.
The *only* way to learn how to write software properly professionally is learning from others on the job.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
look tbh i get what you're saying, but i rather be a freelancer instead of walking into a job and risk having the arrest show up in a background check. Besides idk if your little "you'll be cleaning the office" comment was an insult as well or not, but thanks for the reply i guess
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
