|
|
I've given him the benefit of the doubt this time - although he's been around over 5 years and is very inactive ... does that mean he doesn't post here or they've all been auto-deleted!?!
I've suggested he posts this as a blog instead
|
|
|
|
|
He was banned on Thursday for plagiarising: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4797663/Plagiarised-would-be-article.aspx[^] and he posted more plagiarised material yesterday and was warned by Sean (I confirmed with Sean it was the same gentleman).
Hence when I see that poor an article, which links to his blog, which contains almost entirely only plagiarised material...I kinda wonder if that's the whole point!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Ah - it all becomes clear now! *off to give him a kick*
|
|
|
|
|
|
User still with 8
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
10...
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
article gone, user missing 2 invitations
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spam deleted, spammer remains...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Both gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not any more it isn't...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article gone, member needs more kicks.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this site is for people who act like jerks, both questions i posted i solved myself.goodbye
[Spelling is unedited — SA ] Apparently, this is not true.
I usually don't bring personally offensive behavior to discussion, but this case is a bit different; this member cheated: after having my answer followed by long discussion on how to actually use it and a lot of wrong OP's codes, he posted how own solution and accepted it formally ("green button"). After my note that it does not look nice, he admitted that he got the solution from stackoverflow (nothing new, of course; but how it could be "solved myself"? ), the rude accusation shown above appeared.
There are only 2 OP's answers, his first answer also was self-accepted. In some cases, this is acceptable, but…
Original page: How Do I Send A Pdf As Attachment From A Pdf That Was Dynamically Created?[^]
Account:
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=10736689[^],
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/User-10702590[^].
Even if OP tried to impersonate the whole site based on this case, I don't think this is my fault. I don't think this is acceptable behavior. I personally like to help people who can actually use help, instead of blaming colleagues trying to help.
—SASergey A Kryukov
modified 10-Apr-14 13:03pm.
|
|
|
|
|
People are people. Just act in a way you, yourself, would like to be treated and don't get sucked into abusive conversations.
(As a total off-topic comment: it would have been nicer if question and answers were updated instead of all the solutions / code going into the comments. Makes it very hard to find the actual solution)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I could be nicer, but just not sure that being nicer to some people would serve the common good. You could have noticed that I did not say any rude words but noted "See how it looks…" I'm not sure if you noticed that I wasn't "sucked in abused conversations" as you put it; right after the rude words were told, I didn't tell a single argument.
Probably you should understand that tolerating some kinds of behavior indirectly offends those who behave decently. I'm not saying the reputation of the whole site suffers much if other users see those bad words are tolerated, but it depends on some cultural differences…
Thank you very much, Chris.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: (As a total off-topic comment: it would have been nicer if question and answers were updated instead of all the solutions / code going into the comments. Makes it very hard to find the actual solution) I have been down that road too where you go back and forth with the poster "Try this code..." followed by "It did not solve the problem" and I reply with "Then try this line of code there..." with the intention of eventually updating the Solution when the problem is solved.
[As an example, our back and forth here[^] stalled, but I still want to go back, solve the problem (this time I will simply create a small project with his code and get it working on my system), then update my solution because it concerns a control that I think is nice, but can be a bit tricky to get working correctly.]
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|