|
|
Which makes his existing tip[^] suspicious as well.
Oh look:
The Machine field has one of the following values, which specify the CPU type. An image file can be run only on the specified machine or on a system that emulates the specified machine.
The Machine field has one of the following values, which specify the CPU type. An image file can be run only on the specified machine or on a system that emulates the specified machine.
Another virtually verbatim copy of the Microsoft documentation posted as a "tip".
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I just saw that.
I love the first comment on that one too, "Inspiring." Wait, what?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sohail Pathan from Unknown - Professional Profile[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then it's a press release?
The title seems like a blog.
|
|
|
|
|
as you perhaps have seen - I marked it, with my comment, for discussion because I'm not sure ...
|
|
|
|
|
Article was already gone as I came. The pic, the brand new account, the nuked article...
Looks like you estimated it correctly.
Just a thought... if people would not have been so sure, he would have been caugth by the "still alive" scripts.
If you are not sure about something, post the URL but without Link, this way you don't run the risk of the user getting listed on sunday
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
you mean that I should only post the Link to the "Article" and not the Link to the User who "wrote" it ?
|
|
|
|
|
No... both URLs without klickety
Clickety: - CodeProject[^]
No Clikety: https://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=4280610&aid=5372321
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|