|
Another way is to combine (encode) 2 numbers into 1 eg:
Required range: 22-63
int range = (22 << 16) + (63 & 0xFFFF);
leppie::AllocCPArticle("Zee blog");
Seen on my Campus BBS: Linux is free...coz no-one wants to pay for it.
|
|
|
|
|
This is one of those features that VB has that I wish C# supported. You can just add case statements for each of the values adding the break statement to the last case in the range
switch (value)
{
case 1:
case 2:
case 3:
case 4:
case 5:
case 6:
case 7:
case 8:
case 9:
case 10:
DoSomething ();
break;
}
not pretty but it works.
|
|
|
|
|
I am not sure if this is in the right board, but i'll post anyway. I am looking for suggestions as to the best way of implementing the system for my company. These systems are completely new so there are no backward compatibility considerations.
The company currently has 10 clients (which is likely to rise rapidly) that need to connect to a SQL Server database to get a record, edit it on screen and return the results. The connection needs to be made in such a way that no 2 clients can get the same record. What I really need are some suggestions as to the best way of implementing this. I am quite new to C# and .net as a whole, so my current solution is to use an asp.net application which uses a web service to access a stored procedure. The stored procedure has the logic in it such that it will stop multiple gets of the same record.
I have been doing a little bit of research and have found that the same desired effect may be achieved with COM+ and MTS or using .net remoting. As I have experience with neither of these technologies I would be grateful for some pointers. The web service route works in my test environment, but I need a system that will be suitable of an ever increasing client base.
Jason Pyke
|
|
|
|
|
Hey man, I can't understand why do you want to go for ASP.NEt,web service or remoting? You can easily have a windows application which connect to a databse and do what ever they want. You can isolate recored too. What do you exactly mean by 2 client get same record? You could change your databse/code design to doing something like this, not go for rmoting,WS or...
Mazy
"Improvisation is the touchstone of wit." - Molière
|
|
|
|
|
The only reason I am using ASP.net is that it is possible in the future that the application may need to span sites. When I say 2 clients can't get the same record I mean that there will be a table containing records A,B and C and if 2 clients request a record at the same time client 1 will get record A and client 2 will get record B (client 1 and 2 can't have record A at the same time). Do you think it's worth creating a winforms application on a shared directory for this type of application? My main worries with a winform approach (with no data tier) are scalability and bug fixing (I have had a situation with a previous company where I have had 50 people accessing an app I am trying to compile).
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike Mazdak, I think you'd be well-off if you went with .NET technologies. They're here to stay and are very easy to change and code (decreased development times when you have people that understand .NET already, otherwise factor in your learning curve).
As far as your design, think carefully about what you want to expose as Web Services and what you want to expose as .NET Remoting objects. Web Services provide data, where .NET Remoting provides objects. Web Services are especially handy when providing access for unknown clients (like someone using Java, .NET, or any other SOAP clients). .NET Remoting - though it can use SOAP - is a complex structure that deals with instances of objects rather than just data (even though Web Services can serialize objects into SOAP and vice versa, they don't represent instances of objects - merely copies).
As far as using a client, ASP.NET and Windows Forms are both viable technologies. It's not uncommon for ASP.NET to make use of the same Web Services that external client would, even though they might have direct access to the same data. In cases where scalability is a concern, though, you might consider abstracting that data access layer so that the ASP.NET application and the Web Service (even if hosted in the ASP.NET application) use that to access the data. If you access the Web Services from ASP.NET, you take a performance hit for the serialization and setting up the proxies.
There are plenty of examples about using COM+ (already includes transactions, which negates the need for MTS unless you're talking about something else) from Remoting, and even some topics are included in the .NET Framework SDK, which you should read through (at least the topics and familiarize yourself with what's available in the base class library). MSDN[^] also includes a lot of examples and articles on this. I believe the CodeProject even has a few as well.
This is fairly common in .NET Remoting objects, because it exposes these proprietary technologies (COM+, MSMQ, etc.) to SOAP-compatible clients.
When designed properly, this should be very scalable, especially when using ASP.NET over traditional approaches like ASP or PHP. ASP.NET uses compiled objects; even the .ASPX pages are compiled when used for the first time, and using code-behind source files that must be compiled before publishing speeds things up - including debugging - considerably.
If you use .NET Remoting and Web Services, you can also create smart client applications that can be installed or launch from a URL. We currently have an application that does the latter and uses .NET Remoting. This leads me to warn you though that exposing .NET Remoting objects using IIS as the host automatically exposes them as Web Services - thereby requiring the HttpChannel be used, though you can still use either the binary or SOAP formatter.
I hope this helps.
Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
My Articles
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much for the information. I must admit that some of it is beyond me, but I will read more information using the .net samples/topics as a basis. I am thinking of implementing my data tier as a web service for stage 1 (as that seems easier to implement) and study more on remoting to decide if that's the route I need to go for final build. What I am slightly curious about is what remoting actually is. Is it's implementation much different from a web service? If remoting deals with objects, does that mean they are transactionable? if so how would that be implemented? I will read up more on these topics, but if you could give me a few pointers that would be great. There seems to be a wealth of information out there, I am just having a problem deciding what areas I need to look at.
Jason Pyke
|
|
|
|
|
I would suggest picking up the books .NET Remoting[^] (MSPress) and/or Advanced .NET Remoting[^] (Ingo Rammer). These take you through the basics and to intermediate and advanced topics (Ingo's book).
.NET Remoting in a basic concept is like XML Web Services. Remoting can use SOAP like Web Services do, but the overall architecture is very extensible. For instance, you can use either SOAP or binary formatters provided in the base class libraries, or use your own formatter to which object graphs are serialized. An HttpChannel and a TcpChannel are also provided (HTTP has some overhead, but integrates well when hosted with IIS), or you can create your own transmission chain.
And speaking of chains, .NET Remoting use an aspect-oriented approach - allowing you to chain handlers together to act on the serialized data before transmitting it across the wire. Web Services are not without their extensibility features, but this is acheived by adding custom elements to the SOAP messages, though the WSE from Microsoft (using industry standards like WS-Encryption, WS-Signatures, WS-Routing, and more) provides some additional capabilities. To do all this is much more difficult, though, as opposed to .NET Remoting that allows you to chain sinks together programmatically or as simple as using a .config file (making it easy to change the features of the sink chain without having to recode and recompile, like adding logging capabilities for each message or different types of messages).
Finally, .NET Remoting works with .NET's serialization features to marshal instances of objects across application domains (.NET Remoting is also the prefered way for IPC between AppDomains in .NET, typically using a TcpChannel). Web Services can only send copies of an object.
So, for instance, lets say you had a Person object in your application. If you call a remote method on the Person object using .NET Remoting, if that method modifies the object, the modification will be reflected in the local Person object. With Web Services, you could only get a copy of that object back.
XML Web Services work good for many things, especially B2B, B2P, and P2P communication when dealing with data (like Microsoft Research task pane in their Office 2003 system). .NET Remoting is nice when you want to build distributed applications that work with and modify objects.
Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
My Articles
|
|
|
|
|
Heath, I want to clear it for myself, You mean using COM+/Web Service/Remoting to handle that database processing part and send back results to client application(for example win application) has more performance than to have one windows application which DIRECTLY connect to database and do that part itself? I think they are adding another layer , so does it cause better perfomance?
Mazy
"Improvisation is the touchstone of wit." - Molière
|
|
|
|
|
I never said it would perform better, just making the point that it works better. When architecting enterprise solutions, you have to take many things into account, like scalability, extensibility (for easy changes in the future), possible re-structing of the network (in part or in whole) and many other things. Web Services and .NET Remoting (throw COM+ in there, but I recommend sticking with .NET Remoting on that one) give you flexibility to easily change things in the future, as well as to push-out new services without breaking existing applications. Added to that is that you can make certain services available to business partners and consumers if your company were to require it.
It's not always a question of performance, but also a question of extensibility, modularity (breaking-up assemblies into logic categories, for instance), and scalability.
Always thinking in modular terms will provide you a more robust solution that can grow far into the future. Some would disagree saying, using the term KISS (keep it simple stupid), and for some solutions (say a doctor's office needs a simple scheduling system that won't likely change for many years, as they seldom do) that's fine. When dealing with large enterprise applications, thinking ahead can definitely benefit the architecture than just creating something that just performs a particular job.
Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
My Articles
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I got it. Thanks.
Mazy
"Improvisation is the touchstone of wit." - Molière
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have been trying to generate an EMail with pictures and HTML formatting, if I want to keep the nice stuff, I have two possibilities:
- Link the pics from a web site.
- Include them in the e-mail.
For the second step, If I let the user generate the e-mail with MS-Outlook, should I use automation and read from there the msg format ? Is that the only way of leting the user generate a fancy email and then send them from my application to the customers ?
Thanks in advance, Greetings
Braulio
|
|
|
|
|
The MSG format is an internal format used by Outlook and Office. It is not acceptable to send to SMTP servers. For this, you use MIME which I mentioned earlier in this forum (I think even to you).
Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
My Articles
|
|
|
|
|
 I found a lot of programs to send an e-mail using smtp server
what is it?
what may i wrote in the Smtp server filed,if i'll send to hotmail?
 please help me.
|
|
|
|
|
SMTP is the Simple Message Transfer Protocol, the service used to transfer email. Hotmail does not support the SMTP services. You can only access Hotmail through http://www.hotmail.com[^] or - if you're an extra storage subscriber - the HTTPMail service which is similar in concept to Web Services (although it uses DAV, not SOAP). This can be used through Outlook and Outlook Express.
Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
My Articles
|
|
|
|
|
If you're just wanting to send mail, you need to find a SMTP server you can connect to. If you can't find one, you could always run one on your local machine and use "localhost" as the server. If you do this, make sure you're behind a firewall and you set up the server to only relay mail from the local machine (don't become a spam relay).
IIS has a SMTP server in it and it can be configured where you configure IIS.
There's one last issue you might run into. Big email providers (hotmail, AOL, etc.), might not allow email to originate from your machine depending on your internet connection. It might realize you're a DHCP assigned IP address on a cable modem and flat out not allow you to send email to a hotmail address (this is to cut down on people spamming without liability, people using your machine as a spam relay, and trojan's).
I, for one, do not think the problem was that the band was down. I think that the problem may have been that there was a Stonehenge monument on the stage that was in danger of being crushed by a dwarf.
-David St. Hubbins
|
|
|
|
|
I have a SettingsDialog class, which has a TabControl on it, with several TabPages.
I want to access a specific TabPage with the class constructor when I'm creating the dialog. So, for instance, when I'm inside a Form called Form1, I want to do the following
Form1.Button1_Click()<br />
{<br />
new SettingsDialog("TabPageNameContainingSettingsForForm1").ShowDialog();<br />
}
so that the settings dialog will start directly with the correct TabPage activated.
Sammy
"A good friend, is like a good book: the inside is better than the cover..."
|
|
|
|
|
The TabControl has both SelectedIndex and SelectedTab properties. After you initialize the control, iterate through the TabControl.TabPages collection property and find the TabPage with that name. Set this instance to TabControl.SelectedTab or grab the index and set SelectedIndex (which SelectedTab does internally anyway).
Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
My Articles
|
|
|
|
|
I am getting a null pointer error from the StrRetToStr method I call from COM. The method is called as follows:
<br />
result = COMStuff.StrRetToStr(ref mySTRRET, relativePIDL, out myFileName);<br />
Where mySTRRET is a valid STRRET retrieved from the GetDisplayNameOf method. RelativePIDL is a pointer to the PIDL of the object relative to the parent (Used BindToParent). and myFileName is a 128 charachter marshaled Bstr string.
All values are previously defined. SO i'm not sure why I am getting this error. Is the PIDL not supposed to be the relative one? I've used the origional PIDL, and still have no luck with this. Any help appreciated.
Regards
Cata
|
|
|
|
|
Please post additional code used around this call. Is the error message any more explicit?
- Nick Parker
My Blog
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
How can I generate EMails with HTML and send them using C# / .net.
Sorry but I have no idea about how that kind of e-mail works ( if there is an standard format to have the pics and content embedded or...).
Thanks in advance, Greetings
Braulio
|
|
|
|
|
This is done using MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions). You should first understand how SMTP works and how basic email messages are formatted. It's similar in concept to HTTP, in that you provide headers, skip a line, and begin your content. MIME adds content types, including multipart which allows you to include text, html, images, and more. Image should, of course, be encoded as text (typically base64-encoded, but could be anything so long as clients support it).
For some information about MIME, you can google. There is a specific section on MSDN, MIME Extensions to Internet Mail[^] (kinda of redundant, but oh well) that also includes a sample of a MIME message. It also includes information on many common types used in MIME messages, but you can use anything so long as it can be interpreted by the email client (if it isn't, only the parts of the email that are understood are displayed).
Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
My Articles
|
|
|
|
|
Heath , why don't you advise him MailMessage Class?
Mazy
"Improvisation is the touchstone of wit." - Molière
|
|
|
|
|
Mazdak wrote:
Heath , why don't you advise him MailMessage Class?
While you can send standard HTML with the MailMessage class, the poster originally asked about embedding content including images which would require the use of MIME as Heath noted.
- Nick Parker
My Blog
|
|
|
|
|
Because it doesn't allow you to send pictures as part of the HTML body, only to include a URL from an external resource. You can include attachments, but without using the right MIME header the HTML body won't resolve the attached image correctly.
Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
My Articles
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
