Microsoft Animation Control - C# Discussion Boards

Generating strings that are matched by a regex

8-Jan-04 9:17

nibmike wrote:
This works fine, however msdn claims that non-rectangular windows wont work on graphics cards currently displaying more than 24-bit colour, which is true.

Isnt that 24-bit and less? True transparency only works on 32-bit ARGB and indexed palleted formats like GIF.

leppie ::AllocCPArticle("Zee blog");
Seen on my Campus BBS: Linux is free...coz no-one wants to pay for it.

bnieland8-Jan-04 7:34

bnieland

8-Jan-04 7:34

Folks,

For bizarre reasons, I need to be able to generate random strings that will be matched by a given regex.

i.e. given [a-z][a-z1-9][qrst]
I want an algorithm that will generate

abs
z9q
dvt

et cetera...

Anyone hear of anything similar? Or maybe you know a simple regex parser that I cannibalize?
(C# preferable, or a C related language)

Thanks,

Brett

DTrent

Re: Generating strings that are matched by a regex

Kentamanos8-Jan-04 7:58

Re: Generating strings that are matched by a regex

8-Jan-04 7:58

It's obviously pretty easy to code one for each individual regular expression by hand, but something that generates a random string for ANY given regular expression seems like it would be fairly complicated. I'm pretty sure there's nothing in the base classes for this. It would definitely have to understand the regular expression syntax you're using.

How would you handle something like:

[a-z]*

That means zero to "infinite" lower case letters basically. Would your random generator have an upper limit on cases like that? Would you want zero's to occur more often than other numbers?

I wish I could help more, but I've never heard of anyone doing this (haven't really searched or anything though). Let me know how it turns out.

I, for one, do not think the problem was that the band was down. I think that the problem may have been that there was a Stonehenge monument on the stage that was in danger of being crushed by a dwarf.

-David St. Hubbins

leppie8-Jan-04 8:04

Re: Generating strings that are matched by a regex

8-Jan-04 8:04

I have a simple C# Regex lib designed for a lexer, rather than normal RE. I'll send you the code and if you can use it, i would dearly love to have it Smile | :)

Obviously you would be credited (just place a gpl on your source).

Reply to this message so I grab your email Smile | :)

leppie ::AllocCPArticle("Zee blog");
Seen on my Campus BBS: Linux is free...coz no-one wants to pay for it.

bnieland8-Jan-04 8:25

bnieland

8-Jan-04 8:25

Thanks,

That might help a lot!

DTrent

Microsoft Animation Control

obelisk298-Jan-04 5:13

obelisk29

8-Jan-04 5:13

I am using a the Microsft Animation Control to play a status animation and would like to know if there is a .NET version of this control or something like it that someone has made because COM is Butt-Slow.

Or if someone has a better way todo this using anything please tell me.
TIA

Re: Microsoft Animation Control

Niels Penneman8-Jan-04 7:19

Niels Penneman

8-Jan-04 7:19

What kind of animation does it play? Is it an AVI file?

greetz Wink | ;-)

*Niels Penneman*

Software/Dev Site
Personal Site

Re: Microsoft Animation Control

Heath Stewart8-Jan-04 7:23

Heath Stewart

8-Jan-04 7:23

FYI, most controls in the .NET Base Class Library (BCL) are just wrappers for the Windows Common Controls or - in some cases (like with the WebBrowser control in .NET 2.0) - are just out-of-the-box COM interop classes. You could try searching CodeProject or google the 'net for examples, but most likely these will just encapsulate native functionality anyway. The beauty of .NET is that you don't have to create everything from scratch.

You might also check out the Managed DirectX class at http://msdn.microsoft.com/directx[^]. Implementing this is non-trivial so be sure to read the documentation. There's also a couple articles here on CP, though the ones I've seen don't deal with animation besides sprites (sequence of static images).

If you need the status animation to play immediately, one alternative might be to instantiate the control and load the animation when the class that uses it is initialized, making sure that the animation is in the stopped state. When you need to show it, make the control visible and start the animation. When finished, stop the animation and hide the control and don't dispose it if you'll need it again. You'll get a faster response this way and the user will see immediately that something is going on. Of course, don't forget to set the wait cursor for further affect (and to stop processing mouse messages) using Cursor.Current = Cursors.WaitCursor. Don't forget to set it to the default again when done. Just my $0.02 to add to the user experience.

Re: Microsoft Animation Control

obelisk298-Jan-04 11:45

obelisk29

8-Jan-04 11:45

Thanks for the hefty answer, I'll try all that Smile | :)

------------------

I'm naked under my clothes...

Inheriting from DirectX problem !

pahluwalia8-Jan-04 3:49

8-Jan-04 3:49

Hi,

I have inherited from the DirectX class to play audio files.

public class MyAudio : Microsoft.DirectX.AudioVideoPlayback.Audio
{
public string MyFile;
public MyAudio(string str) : base(str)
{ }
public MyAudio(string str, bool bln) : base(str, bln)
{ }
}

In my code:

MyAudio newAudio = (MyAudio) MyAudio.FromUrl("http://web.com/46.mp3", false);

When I run this app it gives an error on the above line:
"Specified cast is not valid" !

The declaration of FromUrl func is :

public static Microsoft.DirectX.AudioVideoPlayback.Audio FromUrl ( System.String address , System.Boolean autorun )

How can I fix this problem ? I need to inherit from this class as I want to save the name of the file this object is playing !

Frown | :(

Thanks,
Paul

obelisk298-Jan-04 5:17

obelisk29

8-Jan-04 5:17

Why are you trying to cast a reference type of MyAudio to MyAudio.
That is in effect saying "This green cup is green"(Absolutely Pointless).
Or is there some specific reason it needs to be there.
If it doesn't that might be your problem.

pahluwalia8-Jan-04 6:51

8-Jan-04 6:51

If you see the definition of FromUrl:

public static Microsoft.DirectX.AudioVideoPlayback.Audio FromUrl ( System.String address , System.Boolean autorun )

it returns a Microsoft.DirectX.AudioVideoPlayback.Audio object. So if I don't typecast it to MyAudio, it gives a compilation error.

Paul

Kentamanos8-Jan-04 6:52

8-Jan-04 6:52

In this function:

public static Microsoft.DirectX.AudioVideoPlayback.Audio FromUrl ( System.String address , System.Boolean autorun )

the signature states it returns an instance of the "Audio" class. You can't convert "Audio" to "MyAudio" because "Audio" doesn't derive from "MyAudio" (the reverse is true). If the function returned a "MyAudio", you could convert it to "Audio", but the other way around would never work.

If I understand what you're trying to do, you should consider creating a constructor for your "MyAudio" class that takes an "Audio" instance as a parameter.

leppie8-Jan-04 7:13

8-Jan-04 7:13

IMO not providing an external accessible contructor , the class should be sealed, the only option is to encapsulate as .NET doesnt allow you to cast from the base type of a derived class.

leppie ::AllocCPArticle("Zee blog");
Seen on my Campus BBS: Linux is free...coz no-one wants to pay for it.

Heath Stewart8-Jan-04 7:14

Heath Stewart

8-Jan-04 7:14

Another alternative would be to implement an explicit cast operator in the MyAudio class. See "explicit keyword" in your VS.NET help for details.

Essentially, the CLR will use this explicit cast operator to cast from Audio to MyAudio but in the implementation of the cast operator, you'll have to take care of the details.

[edit]
Nevermind. I forgot and was quickly reminded that casting to/from a base class (or for that matter, casting to/from derived class) isn't allowed and throws a compiler error.
[/edit]

Kentamanos8-Jan-04 7:24

8-Jan-04 7:24

Sweet...

I've been doing C# for over two years now, and I don't remember seeing that keyword before Smile | :)

. I immediately looked up "implicit keyword" and was happy with what I found there as well.

Both implicit and explicit keywords are pretty cool.

leppie8-Jan-04 8:33

8-Jan-04 8:33

Exactly what I mention is not possible at all!

Compiler Error CS0553'conversion routine' : user defined conversion to/from base class
User-defined conversions to values of a base class are not allowed; you do not need such an operator.
The following sample generates CS0553:

// CS0553.cs
namespace x
{   
  public class ii   
  {   
  }   
  public class a : ii   
  {      // delete the conversion routine to resolve CS0553      
    public static implicit operator ii(a aa) // CS0553      
    {         
      return new ii();      
    }      
    public static void Main(){}
  }
}

leppie ::AllocCPArticle("Zee blog");
Seen on my Campus BBS: Linux is free...coz no-one wants to pay for it.

leppie8-Jan-04 9:14

8-Jan-04 9:14

That error happens in a very few cases, I myself have only bumped into it once. There is NO way around it, unless you encapsulate the class, like a BufferedStream eg.

leppie ::AllocCPArticle("Zee blog");
Seen on my Campus BBS: Linux is free...coz no-one wants to pay for it.

pahluwalia8-Jan-04 9:02

8-Jan-04 9:02

Can u give an example of what u mean by 'creating a constructor for your "MyAudio" class that takes an "Audio" instance as a parameter.'

How would I specify the file and how would i get the instance of Audio ?

Kentamanos8-Jan-04 10:03

8-Jan-04 10:03

My original advice isn't necessarily the best way to do it. I think I understand a little better now what you're trying to do.

I'm having a hard time figuring out exactly what you're doing, but I might be able to help a bit.

First, the most important thing for you to realize is why what you tried doesn't work. The FromUrl method is a static function that returns an instance of DirectX's Audio class. This type of function is sometimes called a "factory". It's creating a new instance of the Audio class. It's similar to a constructor, but you're not using the "new" operator to create a new instance. Audio is a base class of MyAudio. So an Audio instance can never be converted to a MyAudio (only the reverse can be done).

Now, from what I can tell, you created the "MyAudio" class to simply store a string that's the original file (is this correct?). Since you're dealing with static factory method's that you still want to use and they're not virtual (so you can't override them), my opinion to you would be don't derive from Audio, but contain an Audio instead. The limitation of this is you can't pass around a MyAudio instance anywhere you normally could pass an Audio instance, but it's still not too hard to make it easy to use. For instance, consider this:

public MyAudio
{
   public MyAudio(string url, bool autoPlay)
   {
      audio = Audio.FromUrl(url, autoPlay);
      file = "???"; // Not sure what you should put here...doesn't really make sense      
   }

   public Audio
   {
      get
      {
         return audio;
      }
   }

   private Audio audio;
   private string file;
}

Then you could write code like:

MyAudio ma = new MyAudio(url, autoPlay);

and whenever you needed to do something you'd normally do with Audio, you could just call

ma.Audio

and have access to the contained DirectX Audio instance.

Does any of that help?

pahluwalia9-Jan-04 3:45