|
Just reverse the polarity, and it makes for some witchy transport. 
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
I just envisioned a Quidditch match in Harry Potter IV And The Sorcerer's Starship.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Zoomba? Roomba? Of course not. It's a "Broom"-Ba. What else could it be?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
Usually, I help my mother to solve minor things on her computer remotely while we are on a Teams or Skype videoconference.
Some time ago, activating "Quick Assist" made the sound of the videoconference to be echoing... it's like when you are using a handsfree or like both skype/"quick assist" were trying to use the microphone and loudspeakers at once.
Have you noticed that? and most important... any idea on how to solve that?
Thank you all! ![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Can you try muting your mic in skype? Could be they are both transmitting the audio with different (and probably variable) delays.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
ditto
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry for taking so long answering.
I tried that yesterday and no luck. If I mute the mic no sound is transmitted. 
|
|
|
|
|
I trust you are muting in just one app, not globally.
Or set one app's mic volume to zero?
Or in one of them, select an input device that doesn't exist?
Many ways to skin a cat. 
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
You should use TeamViewer. Then you can control her PC easily. Talk on the phone while you are connected.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, TeamViewer and AnyDesk are much better products, but it's a pity having to use those because an already installed software started acting like that...
Thanks for your post!
|
|
|
|
|
|
It will be interesting to see how they deal with this problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Hopefully we change your 'they' to 'us.' It is our politicians, that we need to get doing our will.
|
|
|
|
|
David O'Neil wrote: It is our politicians, that we need to get doing our will.
Good luck with that. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good luck with that also. I don't know how you feel about the mid-terms over there but from here it looks pretty evenly matched. We have a majority government that is not particularly popular, but the alternative would be worse.
Quote: "In a democracy people get the leaders they deserve."
I have been wondering for almost 60 years what I did wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: I don't know how you feel...
Depressed. They may not get voted out in my life. 
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to reject the idea that 8 billion can each produce a unique piece of art in isolation, but that AI can.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Do you really want one AI to have a copyright on 8 billion artworks, especially when that AI was created from copyrighted material without compensating the original creators?
|
|
|
|
|
AI is using others' material; I think there is still room for original art. Copyright and derivations are another matter. AI doesn't know (yet) what is fair use.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
I get the feeling you didn't understand the point of the artist making that video. Oh well.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave and I have regular rants about hopping on a zoom call when you're already late and having Zoom say "I know you really need to be on this call, but we have a massive update that will take 2 minutes that will result in absolutely no change to your user experience. Please hold..."
Turns out Docker Desktop does the same thing: I need to fire it up for a quick check, but no: I need to wait till it updates before I start using it, instead of (as a crazy idea) updating after I've finished using it.
No option to postpone the update. No option to bypass or halt the update. Just sit back and relax. We know what's best for you.
Please never do this in your apps. Please.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I dislike some things about the snap deployment of Linux apps, but it is civilised in that regard.
When an update is available and you have the app running (very common with things like browsers), it gently nags you.
Something along the lines of "An update for xxx is pending. Please close the program. (14 days remaining)".
If you dismiss the notification, you get another one tomorrow "13 days..."
I've never discovered what happens if you run the timer down to zero.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Your house is on fire, but wait until the call-for-help app updates.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Something like that actually happened to me. I was house-sitting for a friend who lived 300 miles away while they went on holiday, his burglar alarm phoned me to say it had detected a problem, I logged in to his CCTV whereupon Windows decided it was far more important to update itself than let me look at pictures, and maybe call the local police.
This was in the days of XP, if my memory serves. Guess why I now use Linux.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
