|
ditto
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Randor wrote: I want to say it's a lie without ruining his reputation.
Surely he is trying to gain a good reputation by lying? I think you just need to state the facts about the code, without explicitly calling him a liar. Assuming you can prove your case then I think that is all that you need to do. Let others decide for themselves who to believe, and accept that not all of them will side with you.
|
|
|
|
|
The problem with being vague (which is exactly what I did) is that it leaves the thread open to interpretation. Humans have bias, some very important codeproject contractors misinterpreted the thread. Mostly because the author deleted his posts and the moderators cleaned up the rest of the thread. A few netsec experts challenged the claim. Everything was deleted.
Left me out in the open looking like an idiot.
I won't make the same mistake again.
Next time I will announce it on /r/netsec or Ycombinator.
You guys here on codeproject live in a bubble, all 800 web devs read the news.
|
|
|
|
|
Randor wrote: You guys here on codeproject live in a bubble, all 800 web devs read the news.
I certainly don't live in a bubble. But I do choose which sites I go to for news, comment, teaching materials etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard,
I've said thousands of things in my time here on codeproject over the last 20 years. But of all the things I ever said, I want you to know that with 100% confidence I can say you are in an information bubble.
My country has spent over a trillion dollars to ensure that. Sure, I drank two bottles of red wine tonight but it opens my lips. It's the truth. I can't even escape it, I just deal with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Randor wrote: I want you to know that with 100% confidence I can say you are in an information bubble.
Yes, you can say anything you like, but that does not make it true. And given you know very little about me, I don't think you are in any position to make such a judgement.
|
|
|
|
|
I apologize,
I'm trying to say that in my opinion we are all in an information bubble. It's not personal. This appears to be a heated topic, let's terminate it here?
|
|
|
|
|
Randor wrote: Mostly because the author deleted his posts and the moderators cleaned up the rest of the thread.
I don't like that behaviour, he deleting all the messages implies for me that he has something to hide.
I would not delete such a thread. I missed the situation.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I liked Griff's advice and don't see much good coming out of trying to go further.
Is there any possibility the code could have been independently invented?
|
|
|
|
|
If the code was "available for fifteen years", point to a link to archive.org and let people come to their own conclusion. End of story.
|
|
|
|
|
Randor wrote: the truth must be told.
No it doesn't. Don't engage.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with OriginalGriff here.
I believe it was Mark Twain who said that you should never argue with a fool - he will drag you down to his level, and beat you with his experience. The same, IMO, applies to a plagiarist.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
It depends how pissed you are with the plagiarizer and how much time you have on your hands. Jumping up and screaming can be fun and getting into a flame war used to be a favourite pastime for some.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
If I had a couple of well known places supporting / proving my point, I think I would post the code involved and the links to the places cointaining it long time before the article of that other user.
I would not name the user, though.
If someone wants to dig deeper... own decission. Most people here should be able to find what they need to find if they wanted to.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
most of those cybersecurity and ai frameworks could have opensource code in them but they sell for 100k... to enterprise... no point..more worse people and business exists...
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
I see no point in challenging something without being able to support any claims (i.e. evidence).
And there are different ways of introducing evidence.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
Randor wrote: Unfortunately the audience was completely unaware and I was ridiculed by a small minority group.
Not clear from your comment what the actual audience was.
However there is no such thing as "public domain" code where there is no explicit license.
Just because someone claims it is free and clear doesn't mean anything unless there is an explicit license that says just that. Even with secondary sources or worse someone claiming to be an authority claiming otherwise.
And for companies and organizations using any existing code without knowing the license opens them up to public relation problems and potential civil liability also. And in some cases (US laws about security code) even criminal liability.
So as a professional if I was in an company event then I would certainly test my own knowledge of what the actual license was after the event by specifically checking it and then publicly notifying everyone if I did not find an actual license that was acceptable (for a company to freely use.)
|
|
|
|
|
It wasn't this guy[^], by any chance? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure what your goal is here? "The truth must be told" but you want to say it's a lie without ruining his reputation. Those are not compatible statements, and you admit to publicly calling him out on it.
It's not your beef; it is the original author's issue. And we lack details in your post to make any judgement on the wording of the "claim" he made or the context of how it was made. Remember, Al Gore invented the internet. Of course not, but he was influential in moving it along. The context and the exact words matter.
I do have to say I am curious what 15 year old code is being used in modern cybersecurity. 
|
|
|
|
|
- Don't call out anyone's lie if you don't want to damage their reputation.
- Don't waste time complaining if you don't want any action to be taken.
- Switch to decaf.
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciate the intent to take right actions. There have been a number of commendable replies too. One from, I think it's Roland Wilson, brought to mind a point worth considering. Jesus had no problem pointing out the wayward and corrupt nature of the religious leaders of the time and being public about it. How in this case that position would be applied I can only think of the violation of original content. Trying to sell something that has been in the public domain for some length of time is not only a deception but also corruption. As someone else pointed out, deleting the comments appears as strong admission of guilt. Otherwise it is too difficult to make judgment on being unaware of the code being around for any length of time.
One further comment. It appears you recognized the error of passing judgment on others being in an information bubble. As you admit later, we all are. There is certainly no lack of information all around us today. Without some regulation it would most certainly be overload. We all need great discernment to sort truth out of everything that comes at us and that we discover. If such discernment is to be real it must refrain from being arbitrary. Based on absolute truth, the arbitrary has no standing. You have the right and responsibility to point out error based on what is true. Assigning it as judgment on others is a slippery place and in many places something that is reserved for God alone.
As for feeling ridiculed, I think you know of someone who suffered more. So thanks for making an attempt. Live in His blessing.
|
|
|
|
|
My first reply attempt got censored. Admittedly it got lengthy. It was called spam. In much shorter comment, I wanted to point out that Jesus was unashamed to point out the corruption of the Pharisees. May be worth pondering.
|
|
|
|
|
You might want to be careful: not everybody here shares your religion and in accordance with the message at the top of the page it could be counted as trolling - which will get you kicked off the site.
It doesn't take a lot to annoy some people, and religion tends to be a big trigger point, particularly when it's present in all your contributions so far ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OG,
Thank you for the courtesy of providing a response for why my post was being considered as spam. Your comments to the OP's question had good considerations.
My post was in response to the Christian world view that the original poster expressed in his comments. This view, which was the basis for the conundrum of how to handle a moral issue was expressed in the original poster's second post. His second post followed your response to his first. For reference, the OP had difficulty with someone else selling code that was already public domain, the moral issue. Additionally, there was another poster who identified themself as an ashiest. That person had some good points to make despite what I think of their world view.
Again, thanks for the follow up.
|
|
|
|
|
The OP didn't mention any religious worldview: morality is not dependant on any degree belief in any religion! 
And trust me, not all christians have any discernible moral fibre whatsoever - the ongoing fun-and-games with the Catholic church and child abuse indicates that. But that is a discussion for a different site ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
