|
That stuff is pretty handy too, but it never does anything exciting when I apply current to it.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
That depends very much on where the silicone is implanted.
I have lived with several Zen masters - all of them were cats.
His last invention was an evil Lasagna. It didn't kill anyone, and it actually tasted pretty good.
|
|
|
|
|
So, why? Well, I bought a new phone from (whisper it) Amazon back in December. It's a Nokia G20, and it's great. But, after I'd had it for a few days it wouldn't power up one morning so I sent it back for repair.
(Time passes, no sign of it being returned to me, working or otherwise.)
So, tl;dr; Amazon gave me another one.
(Time passes, and meanwhile I learn that all G20's sometimes do this and will only come back on if you hold down the power button for like 3 days. Conclusion: old phone was working fine all along. Hey-ho.)
And then, nearly FIVE MONTHS after I sent it back, guess what? Yep, here it is, back from the great beyond. Bizarre.
So now I have two (even down to them having identical cases - more fool me), and of course I'm always picking up the wrong one. First world problem. But we plan to give one to my mother-in-law so that she can watch the tennis, so it's an ill wind etc. Result.
And thanks to all for putting up with bipolar me. I'll try to keep a lid on things when times are bad.
Paul Sanders.
Some of my best work is in the undo buffer.
|
|
|
|
|
So.. I take it the G@0 is a good phone hey? mmm.... I was thinking I might buy a new one before end of next year... 
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if that's a serious question, but yes, if it's man enough for what you want to use it for it's excellent. Specs are modest but it does everything I want, the battery lasts for 2-3 days, and it has what, for me, is a must-have, to whit a micro SD card slot. If you direct all your photos and vids there, 64 GB of internal storage goes a long way. 'Amazon Basics' cards seem to work well. Avoid the cheapies.
Android 11, two years of updates (IIRC), £130 odd all-in, what's not to like? I have no affiliations to disclose.
Question: how do you get that clickety thing in your post?
Paul Sanders.
Some of my best work is in the undo buffer.
|
|
|
|
|
nice. price seems alright as well!
probably will wait next year and his successor... but we'll keep an eye out for Nokia now! 
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, it's a bargain.
Paul Sanders.
Some of my best work is in the undo buffer.
|
|
|
|
|
So I have this problem with an Azure Function.
It's triggered by a Service Bus queue.
The normal flow would be:
1. Message gets posted on the queue.
2. Function picks up the message and start processing.
3a. If message is released before Function exits, Function auto-renews lock.
3b. Repeat a until Function exits.
4. Function exits and marks the message as completed.
5. Message is removed from the queue.
What happens:
1. Message gets posted on the queue.
2. Function picks up the message and start processing.
3. Function does not auto-renew lock and message gets processed again.
4. Function exits, but does not remove message from queue.
5. Message is ultimately moved to dead-letter queue.
Apparently, the problem is that when a Function's CPU's usage goes above 90%, it starts acting weird (which is mentioned nowhere) 
The CPU, over which I have zero control, is the problem.
It doesn't throw an error, it just runs correctly and acts weird in the background.
Now Microsoft wants me to update to a plan that's $150 a month (from a few bucks now) for a process that runs less than five minutes a day 
Just limit CPU usage and double the time my Function runs
|
|
|
|
|
Can you limit it yourself? Make your code less demanding at a time? Maybe spin off a task on a low priority thread, or sleep it periodically or something?
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure how to make my code less demanding.
It's just a foreach with some 4000 records, that I put in an Excel file (ultimately a huge XML string).
I'm using Spreadsheetlight for this.
I'm not multi-threading or anything, for as far as I know (I don't even think Spreadsheetlight is thread-safe).
I could use a Thread.Sleep, I guess, but it also need to finish in 10 minutes max because of the Azure Functions limitations.
The task as a whole only takes about three minutes right now (and runs to completion, which is why it's even weirder it still fails).
|
|
|
|
|
Try putting some thread.sleep nonsense in your loop?
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
YES!!! THIS FIXED THE ISSUE!!!
I already did some googling, you were just a few minutes late.
This is the first time in my career I found a valid use case for Thread.Sleep (although, valid? ).
I didn't even know it could do this.
You learn something new every day I guess
Just a few milliseconds did the trick for my test to work.
I can monitor CPU usage and it seems to stay at around 20%.
Now let's see if it survives a production environment...
|
|
|
|
|
Good luck!
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
This has bad karma all over it. Then again, I live in the embedded world.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh boy, that gives me confidence in Azure. Maybe it's a Microsoft feature that they have a well known history for....?
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a bit like saying "my computer froze this one time and now I don't have confidence in computers anymore."
Although this does limit my confidence in Azure Functions a bit 
|
|
|
|
|
Not really  . Just Azure. Remember the days when Windows isn't done until <name of="" spreadsheet="" software="" competing="" against="" excel"="" won't="" run?
<div="" class="signature">Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
I've been thrown into the deep end to learn Google's People API. It seems that 99% of the documentation is Google's, which isn't as complete as I figured it would be.
Are the any other resources that I can look into? I need entry level docs.
Thanks
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
try one simple demo to pull just one person to play around ...
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm working on an app that uses it and it's giving us trouble with oAuth & scopes, so I'm looking for a resources outside of what Google prodvides.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
better ask at stack overfloe what u really face as issue
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I have.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
