|
Thanks for your tip, at this point I`m still not sure what I want to use.
|
|
|
|
|
This should likely be in a lounge rant, but it is technical.
I have a project on a system that I need to compile to fix an issue. The issue is trivial. But when I go to Build...all it gives me is "Run Code Analysis on Solution". 
I've reset permissions on the folder, I have made sure 2015 is up to date, but 2015 won't give me the prompts.
What am I missing?
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Did you try to Rebuild All (or how is it exactly called in VS2015? - I cannot recall ...)?
|
|
|
|
|
It's not in the menu. This is maddening
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
How about:
Rebuild <project>
Rebuild solution
in the menu "Build"?
Or just "Clear solution"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rep-point fluffing to get his spam link shown in his profile.
Message and user reported.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Victor Nijegorodov wrote: What is it?
Spam.
|
|
|
|
|
Check that your .vcxproj files are there. If they are, check the Properties of your project(s) to see if their dependencies are correct and if they generally make sense.
|
|
|
|
|
Weird, never figured it out. Pulled the project from a zip file, and it built.
Appreciate all the suggestions.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
charlieg wrote: What am I missing?
Presidents shouldn't be compiling software. You need a software developer. 
|
|
|
|
|
lol, true. I'm also the treasurer. It's oh dark thirty here and thanks for the laugh.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
This is what is in the Build tab: image-2022-04-22-062801040 — ImgBB[^]
This code lives on a VM that was migrated into a zero trust cloud. I can go back to the original VM, and 2015 there has the full build menu.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
As I recall, Visual Studio has never supported working with solutions that are located on network/remote drives.
Are you working with Visual Studio on the virtual machine where the solution resides?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
No, I just RDP into it. Nothing too fancy.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
A STL container is not your typical c++ class, how do you declare a vector pointer and pass it to a function.
class someclass
{
public:
int ID;
}
void somefunction(vector<someclass>* vec)
{
someclass scitem;
vec->push_back(scitem);
}
vector<someclass>* vec;
somefunction(vec);
I`m also not sure how a vector of pointers would work.
void somefunction(vector<someclass>* vec)
{
someclass * scitem;
scitem = (someclass*)malloc(sizeof(someclass));
vec->push_back(scitem);
}
vector<someclass*>* vec2;
somefuntion(vec2);
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, STL containers are just template classes and can be manipulated the same as any class objects. And as such, a vector may contain objects, or pointers to objects. But remember in the second case that the items pointed to, must not be removed while the vector still owns them.
std::vector<char*>* pMyvec = new std::vector<char*>(); pMyvec->push_back("A string");
pMyvec->push_back("Another string");
int result = myfun(pMyvec);
BTW you should not use malloc in C++ code, as new and delete is the correct way to manage memory.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: And as such, a vector may contain objects, or pointers to objects
But when you add a class object, the vector doesn`t make a copy of the object, it creates a pointer to the object being added. A linked list deals with pointers not objects.
|
|
|
|
|
If you add an object to an STL container (vector, list, set, map...), the object is copied into the container. The objects must all be of the same type, however. The only way to put polymorphic objects into a container is to use a container of pointers to their common base class, in which case the objects need to survive outside the container, probably by having been allocated from the heap.
modified 16-Apr-22 7:34am.
|
|
|
|
|
thanks Greg, I`ll keep that in mind.
|
|
|
|
|
CalinNegru wrote: when you add a class object, the vector doesn`t make a copy of the object, it creates a pointer to the object being added.
No, the vector copies whatever type you have declared it with. For example:
std::vector<std::string> myVec;
std::string newstr = "A string";
myVec.push_back(newstr);
CalinNegru wrote: A linked list deals with pointers not objects.
Well sometimes it does; but what has that to do with this question?
|
|
|
|
|
ok, I think I get your point
|
|
|
|
|
Message Closed
modified 15-May-23 19:06pm.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
