|
Well, not everyday, and normally with a prefix! 
It's a fairly well known word though.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I got it by my wife's help who got it from a store name near our home. And yes, with a prefix.
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
In use mostly by women. I almost had it but I tried a military word with all but one of the same letters.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
4 for me!
Wordle 290 4/6
⬜🟩⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟨🟨⬜
🟩🟩⬜🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Apparently a much used word in the UK, but not a word I know.
In the end, I had three letters in place, a fourth to put in one of the other two spots, and this was the only word that sounded like it wouldn't summon some Aztec deity.
Wordle 290 6/6
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜
🟩⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟩⬜🟩⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
🟨🟩⬜⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Come to live here - you will hear the world every day...
Wordle 290 4/6
🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟨🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Phew.
Wordle 290 6/6*
⬛🟨🟩⬛⬛
⬛🟩🟩⬛🟨
🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"It is easy to decipher extraterrestrial signals after deciphering Javascript and VB6 themselves.", ISanti[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
4/6
⬜🟩⬜🟨⬜
⬜🟩🟨🟨⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
I had difficulties with this one because it's so similar to an Italian word that I was skipping it, not even recognizing its presence in English - also it's used in a very specific field.
Today I discovered that the word LATIN doesn't exist in the Worlde dictionary, except that last time I checked LATIN is a language...
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 290 5/6
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
🟨⬜🟨⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜
⬜🟩🟨🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 290 3/6
⬛🟨🟨🟨⬛
🟨🟩🟨⬛🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Uninstalled old version: Check.
Cleared all nuget caches and temp folders: Check.
Installed new version: Check
Clean and build the project: Check, no errors.
Run the app: blows up when calling the package, no error caught, no warnings, nothing written to App Insights, nothing useful in Event Viewer.
Argh!
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
fuslogvw (fusion* log viewer) may help you.
Open your Visual Studio Developer command prompt as admin.
c:\dev>fuslogvw <ENTER>
This will start an app which can tell you which assembly is failing to bind.
NOTE: Make sure you turn it off afterwards because their is s heavy penalty for leaving it running
See Fuslogvw.exe (Assembly Binding Log Viewer) - .NET Framework | Microsoft Docs[^] for details.
And, oh yeah, it ain't a pretty tool, but it can help you where nothing else can in these situations.
*Fusion was the original code name for .NET Framework
|
|
|
|
|
Odd. It is filled with multiple entries like:
LOG: Attempting download of new URL file:///C:/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio/2019/Professional/MSBuild/Current/Bin/NuGet.Frameworks/NuGet.Frameworks.EXE.
But also for a gazillion Microsoft DLLs like C:/Users/<me>/AppData/Local/Programs/Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer/resources/app/ServiceHub/MSAL-Services/IdentityService/Microsoft.VisualStudio.Telemetry.DLL
And each group is followed by:
LOG: All probing URLs attempted and failed.
I see nothing related to the package I'm having issues with.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
what are you going to do then? what are your options?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm submitting a support ticket with the vendor (Iron Software) with whom we still have a service contract.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah the tool is quite cryptic. There should be a way to set it to only track a specific exe. Also try clearing it then only running the target app and you may see it more clearly. It’s weird how you start & stop it also. It’s kinda terrible but once you get it, it should be clear.
|
|
|
|
|
That, and it seems to log everything, even when nothing is running. And you can't make the window bigger or do a search. Obviously the tool is something someone threw together with minimal effort and they never used it again.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, it's ugly & probably from 2002 and it's a tough nut to crack. But if you get it right, it should show you the missing assembly. HOpefully.
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect there is no missing assembly, in spite of the myriad "All probing URLs attempted and failed." messages. The package runs, but causes the app to exit when it attempts to execute one of the package's main functions. No errors, no log entries, no event logs, just exits from Debug mode.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
I have never had any issue with NuGet that I was not able to resolve.
I hope you find a way to resolve your issues. 
|
|
|
|
|
I've been able to resolve two issues before, but this one is causing all kinds of strange behavior, such as Visual Studio suddenly insisting that Microsoft.Azure.WebJobs was not installed and/or referenced when it most certainly was, or at least NuGet insists it was installed. Then after a half hour of searching for a solution and handling unrelated issues I come back and VS is all happy again, it concedes that WebJobs is indeed there. But the other package still fails. 
Any hints you can give me? What actions do you take to resolve NuGet problems?
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
This may be interesting if you are comparing / deciding upon which web host to use.
I've had a miserable time finding one that is consistent.
Long ago I used GoDaddy & invariably it would get into a state where it was inaccessible or so slow that it would be useless & people thought my site was down.
I moved to SmarterAsp.net & they are extremely fast.
However, their entire site has been DDOS'd two times in the past year or so. With an outage recently that left my site unavailable for over 24 hours.
They also have a snippet at the bottom of their sales page[^] that states:
Quote: 99.9% Uptime Guarantee
We'll credit you a MONTH's service for every hour of interrupted service.
I contacted them about it and they said, "Nope. We don't do that for DDOS attacks. It's in our SLA, read it."
So I decided to move to WinHost
However, their site is SUPER S-L-O-W -- and their control panel doesn't report as much good stuff.
Super Slow?
I created this little test & I would appreciate it if any of you would try it out on both sites then report values here.
Here's the test that I run to compare SmarterASP.net to WinHost.
1) Load page which includes 5MB image.
2) measure time while page loads (get time before & after page load, compare milliseconds)
Comparison Snapshots
Check out the difference in load times:
Loaded via SmarterASP.NET web site[^].
Loaded via WinHost web site[^].
Load Times
SmarterASP.NET loaded it in 1.565 seconds
WinHost loaded it in 13.615 seconds. 🤯🤯🤯
Possible Difference
SmarterASP one is not doing HTTPS
I moved the test under one of my sites hosted by SmarterASP which is also on HTTPS and ran it again:
SmarterASP.net site with HTTPS[^] (image of results).
Still extremely fast 0.952 seconds.
Might You Try it For Me?
Would you mind trying it and letting me know what you get for each site?
1) WinHost Site: Test Load Speed[^]
2) SmarterASP.net site: Test Load Speed[^]
Have any of you noticed these kinds of differences?
|
|
|
|
|
WinHost : 10.9
SmarterASP : 5.0
so not as dramatic difference as you noticed, but still significant.
Keep Calm and Carry On
|
|
|
|
|
k5054 wrote: WinHost : 10.9
SmarterASP : 5.0
Thank you very much. And, at least this confirms that yes, the WinHost one is quite a bit slower (2x slower) than smarterasp.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
