|
The original creator is alleging Babel misused funds and paid a developer that "didn't actually work on the project." Did he think he was the CEO?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not surprised that unethical behavior could also occur in an open-source project, particularly when money is involved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tomasz Waraksa wrote: And how would I know that, without the ability to look into the source code?
As if you would go trhough the source code of the OS 
Journalist, not a programmer. Bring a shipload of salt before reading the article.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
That's why it is amusing, the luck of the Irish you know ...
Personally I think a Chromebook is a good option for moms, if you don't mind Google spying on you that is 
|
|
|
|
|
Flagship Core i9-11980HK allegedly beats Ryzen 9 5900HX by 11 to 26 percent. There's lies, damned lies, and benchmarks
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: There's lies, damned lies, and benchmarks
Not to forget statistics and political promises... 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, The Claim itself proves that they are no longer the leader.
|
|
|
|
|
Flexible, open-ended learning software works but finds the real world difficult. "Put one foot in front of the other, and soon you'll be walking 'cross the floor"
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: but finds the real world difficult.
Another way to say... "it worked in my computer"?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
*hits it when it walks the wrong way*
No dammit. Bad boy!
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
A PriorityQueue contains pairs of elements and priorities. It then keeps track of the min value of the priorities. When it absolutely, positively, needs to be in order
|
|
|
|
|
"When everything's a priority, nothing's a priority."
|
|
|
|
|
When everything is equally unimportant, and the slight tickle of benign indifference you are aware of makes you smile: that transient eternity is about as good as it gets 
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: new Queue<(int drone1, int drone2), double>()
So, um, why isn't he actually using PriorityQueue
PriorityQueue<string, int> queue = new PriorityQueue<string, int>();
|
|
|
|
|
Because his priorities aren't the same as .NET's priorities?
I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated.
|
|
|
|
|
Rust 2021 contains a number of small changes that are nonetheless expected to make a significant improvement to how Rust feels in practice. You know - never sleeping
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: how Rust feels in practice.
Harsh and uneven?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
IBM announced during its Think 2021 conference on Monday that its researchers have crafted a Rosetta Stone for programming code. It can convert C++'s if(){} into Java's if(){}!
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: that its researchers have crafted a Rosetta Stone for programming code.
Was it not the machine code?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
A coalition which includes Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Apple, Google, AT&T, Cisco Systems, General Electric, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), and Verizon and interestingly not Intel (together the Semiconductors in America Coalition (SIAC)) has called on congressional leaders to appropriate $50 billion for domestic chip manufacturing incentives and research initiatives. This is why we're fat
Mind you - "All Dressed" are great.
|
|
|
|
|
The profits are capitalized, the expenses are socialized. Hmmmph....
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed. It's very odd. Can't these immensely successful companies fund their own fab?
Perhaps if US taxpayers were to be shareholders in the fab then that would be fair -- sharing reward as well as risk.
To be fair though, if these companies (and the USA itself) are competing against subsidies offered by some foreign governments then this might just make sense.
|
|
|
|
|
Some of these companies are probably worth more than those foreign governments.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
markrlondon wrote: ...this might just make sense.
Apple could do it themselves without any problem: Apple cash on hand for Q1. ![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif) them for trying to socialize it.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
