|
In my opinion Algol W was not perfectly satisfactory. It still contained too many compromises, having emerged from a committee. After my return to Switzerland, I designed a language after my own preferences: Pascal. begin
|
|
|
|
|
The ebpf-for-windows project aims to allow developers to use familiar eBPF toolchains and application programming interfaces (APIs) on top of existing versions of Windows. Step 0: embrace
That's OK, people: don't bother explaining what eBPF does. I'm sure everyone knows already.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: That's OK, people: don't bother explaining what eBPF does. I'm sure everyone knows already.
Do you mean the link in the first two words?
But besides trying to annoy you a bit... yes, I agree. A (at least) two liner description when someone speaks about something is a must. You can't take as granted that everyone who will read the article will know what you are telling.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: That's OK, people: don't bother explaining what eBPF does. I'm sure everyone knows already.
Judging by the substance free article I assume it's a platform to convert buzzwords into being hired for a new job. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
But it uses the word 'familiar' so surely everyone must know 
|
|
|
|
|
RemObjects has debuted the Mercury programming language, described as a modern Visual Basic "with a future" for all platforms. I'll let you decide if "Modern Visual Basic" an oxymoron
"with a Future" /smirk
|
|
|
|
|
Is "![Elephant | [mastadon]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/elephant.gif) ing legacy" considered "future" too?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apple: "We have advanced security technology."
Everyone: "Does it work?"
Apple: "No, but we have advanced security technology."
(Microsoft: "We have new icons.")
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Woodbury wrote: Microsoft: "We have new icons."
Sad but true.
And version 78 of C#, currently running on version 42 of .NET microcore.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The article was about their decision to not even tell the people they knew were affected. It wasn't about telling the world. They most definitely should have told those who were affected.
|
|
|
|
|
Voyager 1 has left the Solar System - and it's finding that the void of space is not quite so void-like, after all. It just can't remember the words to the tune
|
|
|
|
|
"Love is a tune you hum-de-hum-hum"
Voyager discovered love!
(For really obscure: Voyager, Sing to us softly)
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: It just can't remember the words to the tune
Do you mean...
Quote: ... We will control the horizontal. We will control the vertical... we will control all that you see and hear.... You are about to experience the awe and mystery which reaches from the inner mind to... The Outer Limits.
?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Quite as an aside:
Forty Three years and it still working. One must assume it has no Chinese-made components.
It reminds me of a time when if you bought something your (1) expected it to work, and (2) expected it to last longer than the box it came in. I guess QC must have really meant something way back then . . . perhaps "Quality Control" ?
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: Forty Three years and it still working.
And washing machines have a life span of 10 years 
It's easier to "live long and prosper" in space, since there's little stuff to interact with, little wear, and definetely no artificially limited lifespan. Lots of that stuff needs be replaced in a few years, where they could last 3 to 4 times that long with easier repairs.
For those factories proud of their A-label producing washing machines that are "green" and environmental friendly - elephant you, you hippocrites.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Overwork culture is thriving; we think of long hours and constant exhaustion as a marker of success. Given what we know about burnout, why do we do give in? "No one on their deathbed ever said, 'I wish I'd spent more time at work'"
|
|
|
|
|
|
I, for one, I am not suffering from that!
Must be an American thing!
modified 11-May-21 7:18am.
|
|
|
|
|
At the beginning I was like that, but I luckily changed my mind a while ago.
I now prefer to say: Work to live, not live to work.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
In my late 20's my manager commented on my leaving at 5 PM, saying he expected his team to work 60 to 70 hours a week. I went straight to the president, with whom I had a very good working relationship (it was a small company) and told him I would report the manager to the labor board (or whatever sounded impressive.) The manager was very respectful after that and never harassed me again.
The article mentions entrepreneurs several times. I do believe, if you're an entrepreneur, you're going to be putting in more than 40 hours a week, for a variety of reasons. And that applies to just about anything, not just software development. But once one is out of the entrepreneur phase, work hours should be more normal, except that it's hard to break that "lifestyle."
I often wonder where the 40 hour work week came from, and according to wikipedia, we have....
CANADA!
to blame:
Quote: Canada. The labour movement in Canada tracked progress in the US and UK. In 1890, the Federation of Labour took up this issue, hoping to organise participation in May Day. In the 1960s, Canada adopted the 40-hour work week.
But not entirely:
Quote: The Ford Motor Company advanced the idea in 1914, when it scaled back from a 48-hour to a 40-hour workweek after founder Henry Ford believed that too many hours were bad for workers’ productivity.
|
|
|
|
|
From Eight-hour day | National Museum of Australia[^]
Eight hours to work,
Eight hours to play,
Eight hours to sleep,
Eight bob a day.
A fair day’s work,
For a fair day’s pay.
Nineteenth Century Aussie unionism.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: The Ford Motor Company advanced the idea in 1914, when it scaled back from a 48-hour to a 40-hour workweek after founder Henry Ford believed that too many hours were bad for workers’ productivity.
It wasn't a subjective number or just Ford; the early 20th century saw lots of research into varying work day durations and frequencies, with the 40 hour figure coming out as the one that on average resulted in the maximum long term output per worker. >40h/week would see a gradual slow down in the hourly working rate due to fatigue along with a steady increase in the number of errors made. The one figure from that work that's commonly quoted today is that over a 2 month period a team working 40h/week and one working 60h/week will have the same total output, and over longer periods the 40h team will pull ahead because they're able to remain well rested and alert while the 60h one is fumbling around with exhaustion going slowly and creating lots of problems needing rework.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
|
I wish I could turn it off after 5pm. More often than not I find myself up at 3am thinking about the project I currently working on, and not surprisingly, I'm good and tired the next day. It used to not be the case 20-25 years ago, but over time has become much worse. Perhaps more ![Beer | [beer]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif) before bed? 
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
