|
hemorrhoids - horrid piles 
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
YAUT! Here's the derivation for those who are interested:
horrid buildings buckled piles = hemorrhoids
=>homes (anag) (def)
modified 6-May-21 8:55am.
|
|
|
|
|
Blimey I didn't think it was the answer
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
hmmm... there's an A missing for us Brits! (You could call it an a-hole, I suppose...) 
(haemorrhoid in case you were wondering where it goes)
|
|
|
|
|
I completely forgot that you spell it with one of your bizarre ae and oe digraphs!
|
|
|
|
|
I thought it must have an alternative spelling - not very nice sublect matter for a crossword clue.
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Ok it's with a heavy heart I hand over my mantle of the most unreliable CCC setter, ladies and gentlemen will you please welcome Greg Utas
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Does this also mean OG loses his job as CCC reminderer?
It goes without saying
|
|
|
|
|
Greg will keep him on his toes
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
I was busy.
Well ... I was having a leak when he posted it for me ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
TMI! Thanks for sharing 
|
|
|
|
|
First I have to admit I am a Microsoft apologist and happily jump to each new OS without complain.
However.. I went down the memory lane and stumbled on Windows XP. And I though that Windows 10 is so good, why would anyone like XP over W10?
However I stumbled on a (2017) pots of someone complaining how W10 was bloating in comparison, running hundred of unwanted and unneeded processes devouring CPU.. and I though I can't really compare.. my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU...
So please come at me with your anecdote why XP is better than W10!
I am just curious to see if I can be swayed...
EDIT for clarity
I believe Windows 10 performance is really good (I have a clean install on my PC not a pre install), but hey, I can't 100% sure...
Startup definitely faster for sure.. it's almost instant after bios, unlike like 2 minute for XP back in the days
And I think it's relatively easy to launch any program you have installed, I think the current start menu seems leaner than XP with a very quick search box (I think it has changed in that last year or 2)
modified 6-May-21 5:03am.
|
|
|
|
|
Super Lloyd wrote: my W10 certainly runs very fine.. but it's powered by a monster modern CPU...
That's my problem with W10. All I really needed was XP + support for modern peripherals + better security (patches, bug fixes, etc.). I did not need all of the cruft that comes with Windows 10, and that requires the "monster modern CPU".
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I still remember when you wrote: "What I really needed was DOS 6.22 + support for dishwashers and better security (padlock on floppy disks, etc.) ..."
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?"
-- Rigoletto
|
|
|
|
|
Link and photo, or it didn't happen. 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
My personal assertion is W10 does not need a monster CPU and is quite good... But, however, I cant be really sure...
However my CPU however is around a few percent everytime I look at it... so... I have a hard time it is a performance hog....
|
|
|
|
|
wow. what cpu do you have? mine always goes up over time, mainly due to browsers. it returns when i restart it/them. and trying out Uno Platform recently my cpu went into the 70s and 80s (for the first time) and i had to reboot to get everything to calm down. i'm looking for something more heavy duty now. (it could just be a RAM issue. trying to figure out if my machine can take more. i always have a hard time getting info on that.)
Current: Intel Core i7-6700HQ CPU @ 2.60GHz
|
|
|
|
|
I got DDR4 memory, 16Gb, 512 SSD, and some Ryzen / AMD something cpu
|
|
|
|
|
I still have XP on a hard drive, which I swap back into my laptop (replacing Win10) so I can use my HP Flat Bed scanner. As you say, MS drops support for old hardware, requiring me to revert to XP.
|
|
|
|
|
Win10 is also the first Microsoft OS I think it is a step back (but for the One-That-Shall-Not-Be-Named, but I think nobody talks about it anymore).
What I utmost hate is the flat design and the redesign of the settings - To me a true step back.
Developers stop caring about resources years ago because they are cheap. So yes, you need the big monster modern PC to run anything.
A printer driver 4Gb ? A pdf reader 2Gb ? An ... OS 122 Gb ?
As you may know, I am the IT guy of my local school - Teachers are using interactive applications, which are sometimes nothing else than encapsulated HTML5 or pdf viewers; one of them is sucking up 220Gb of disk space (you read that well) and need more than 10Gb RAM to run. To merely DISPLAY things on the screen, and it is slow as hell.
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: ... the first Microsoft OS I think it is a step back (but for the One-That-Shall-Not-Be-Named, but I think nobody talks about it anymore).
So that'll be ... DOS 4.0?
Windows RT?
Windows NT?
Vista?
Win 8?
Am I warm yet? 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
... Vista ...
Dos 4.0 was awesome, I still miss WinNt to some extent, Win8 ? What is win8 
|
|
|
|
|
DOS 4 was so buggy, IBM refused to install it on their PCs!
It used a load more of my precious 640K base memory, and crashed daily. And MS ignored all beta tester input as usual.
4.01 was OK .. but still not the multitasking OS MS had been promising us ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Windows ME is my vote for the worst ever version of Windows - I "upgraded" my then boss's new laptop from ME to Windows 98, and everything just worked better.
|
|
|
|
|
My boss at the time (I became his boss a year or two later) bought a dual processor PC to run ME on in the hope of getting faster results from his PCB layout software.
ME only supports a single processor ... he wasn't happy.
Mind you, his layout software didn't work multithreaded even years later when he had an OS that supported multiple cores. 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
