|
Oh they do, assuming we think it means the same..
|
|
|
|
|
And if I suppose you put the tea bag in yourself and someone else took it out, would thay have mugged or de-mugged you?
|
|
|
|
|
Be glad it wasn’t a coffee filter. That could be grounds for divorce.
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
It must have been a gift from the cat. Did it get your tongue in exchange?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
A bit of an experiment here, and what better way to get people involved than with a generous dollop of click-batey title 
I am interested in seeing how well the UI handles a post that has all (or most of) the reactions selected.
For those that don't know, there is a button just to the left of this post that allows selecting 1 of the 12 available emojis. Can you select more than one per user? Good question, I have no idea!
As far as I am aware I gain no reputation or other benefit from reactions on this post, other than to satisfy my curiosity. So this isn't some "farming trick".
UPDATE Apparently we do get rep from reactions. I promise to use any donations responsibly 
It would also be fun to see how easy it is for "voters" to keep the selections balanced, though I expect the lounge isn't active enough for it to be too difficult to keep them at 1 vote per reaction.
UPDATE This part is a bit pointless now as I realised it's very easy to change your reaction, which makes it very easy to keep them balanced (assuming that is your aim of course).
modified 14-Apr-21 11:39am.
|
|
|
|
|
The imoji click has been around long enough to be modified, updated, and refined.
I find it incredible they you've not tried to see the result of trying a second clicked selection.
I also find it incredible, although not impossible, that you haven't observed their reflection in rep-points, both for the clicker (1) and for the poster (various).
So perhaps your real experiment is to see if any of will believe you ( . . . ever again . . . ).
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: I find it incredible they you've not tried to see the result of trying a second clicked selection.
It's an IQ thing. 
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: I find it incredible they you've not tried to see the result of trying a second clicked selection.
Literally only thought of it while I was typing the post and only because I wrote the bit about a 1 in 12 choice that made me question if that was actually just a single choice. I just assumed it would be 1 per user (like voting) and had never before thought to test it. Or even, perhaps I did test it before and just forgot I did... it's hardly a life changing memory I will always cherish!
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: also find it incredible, although not impossible, that you haven't observed their reflection in rep-points, both for the clicker (1) and for the poster (various).
Had no idea. I don't much care for my reputation points so I never notice them change. It's not like that "36.2K" at the top of my screen changes often enough for me to take any interest in it. In fact, I was fairly certain I had read a post at some point on the lounge with someone saying users don't get any rep for them. I must have mis-remembered that though as I have no reason to doubt you.
It's also interesting that you suggest the poster gets different points depending on which reaction is used... they seems a very strange choice in my opinion.
So there you have it, you have had 2 "incredible" experiences in such a short space of time. You're welcome! I wonder how that makes you react? 
P.S. If it is possible, I am willing to donate any rep gained from this post to a nominated charity. Do we do "bounties" on here?
|
|
|
|
|
musefan wrote: Literally only thought of it while I was typing the post
We can see that.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like it is only one emoji per member.
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed as I just tested it on your post.
On reflection it's likely I had observed that back when they first appeared, but just never made a mental note of it.
And while I am here... thanks for taking part 
Although it turns out I do get a little rep for the reactions, so apologies if you feel cheated in any way. But you also get some!
|
|
|
|
|
My clicks were a bit random, but it did demonstrate the answer.
|
|
|
|
|
You know, in a different context: 'you get some for me and you'll get a little, too' sounds all too much like a kick-back scheme.
No Politics in the Lounge !
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I see you are trying to use blackmail to negotiate your share....
Fine, you win, have a thumb
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the judicious choice of fingers.
Note to Chris: implications for just one more icon . . .
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: It looks like it is only one emoji per member.
... and if you select a 2nd one, it removes your 1st one
|
|
|
|
|
jsc42 wrote: it removes your 1st one
Well it is a replace operation.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: a replace operation.
Is this the first successful emoji transplant since records began?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clearly my IQ is under 3. 
|
|
|
|
|
Be careful... Balboos could see it and add "no surprise here" 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I gave him an upvote, but you can still mark as spam.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't worry - I clicked them tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
The experiment went well and we got all the reactions on the board. There was also an upvote which is nice to see on there too as it takes even more space up.
Everything seems to fit well (as expected really), but it was interesting to see how the hover panel coped with having 18 reactions. It just shows 10 of them (I assume most recent) and then indicate how many others as a single line of text. Which I feel is a good decision as you wouldn't want a huge panel that never stops growing.
On my mobile phone it doesn't seem to cope quite as well. Not sure if CP has different CSS for mobile sites so that might explain why it is how it is.
I also noticed that the reactions don't actually show unless you are logged in. Which seems a bit strange as to why that should matter (as I can see votes without logging in).
Anyway, thanks again for those that took part
|
|
|
|
|
💩
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
