|
The Windows Sandbox and the Microsoft Defender Application Guard (WDAG) now launch faster in Windows 10 after installing the Insider Preview Build 21343 for Windows Insiders in the Dev Channel. They removed the cat "gifts"? (sandboxes are usually better without)
|
|
|
|
|
It boots faster... aha.
Why did I think they could have made it safer? or more robust / stable?
I suppose I still am a bit too optimistic  
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Devs scramble for replacement mimetype data package You mean those licenses actually matter?
|
|
|
|
|
Apparently, the didn't follow the "feel good" ethical open source model.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Since mimemagic is mostly a database of mime type data mappings,
So it converts a file extension to the appropriate mime type?
And you need a database for that?
And you need an open source project for that?
I must be missing something, but whenever I had to touch Ruby/Rails, I always had that feeling.
|
|
|
|
|
The open-source licensing organization is investigating the hack and will then re-do the election. Just a little too open, I guess?
|
|
|
|
|
It seems a little over 10 years ago, concatenating things on the front of the word Ops has becoming increasingly popular. And, to a point, increasingly meaningless. Stop - you must not Dev on Ops
With apologies to Dr. Seuss
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: concatenating things on the front of the word Ops
Like an "o"? Oops. 
|
|
|
|
|
Is that how you get Pissed Off Ops?
|
|
|
|
|
tech writers,tech journalist and cios would invent new jargon's and terms if the old one goes away... like then new digital transformation thing.... we will make you see the tech reality and tech awakening.......
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
It should yield insight into how black holes gobble up matter and emit powerful jets. "Where we're going, we won't need eyes to see."
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty cool video.
If the last seconds are not a fraud... wow.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: If the last seconds are not a fraud...
Unfortunately, they are computer-generated. If the orientation of the jet is correct, it cannot be seen to move that fast from Earth. You could see the jet apparently approaching us at a superluminal speed it it were (a) pointed almost directly at Earth, and (b) moving very close to the speed of light.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I knew... too pretty to be true.
I suppose that is the theoretical model.
Still pretty cool though
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: The EHT captured photons trapped in orbit around the black hole, swirling around at near the speed of light, creating a bright ring around it.
Well this is wrong. Photons always travel at the speed of light, not near the speed of light. I think she means ions of gas trapped in orbit around the black hole.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Developers wish they could launch new features quickly to keep up with the competition, but bug hunting, small teams and budget limitations are getting in the way of innovation. Just ship it - what's the worst that could happen?
I'm just going to go out on a limb here and guess that Rollbar can sell you something to fix this problem?
|
|
|
|
|
Am I the only one noticing that the most obvious thing are missing? 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: Am I the only one noticing that the most obvious thing are missing?
Does it begin with "M" and end with "r" or "t", depending on the depth of the middle tiers?
|
|
|
|
|
Ding, ding, ding... 
EDIT:
After reading your message below a small clarification... I actually agree with you in big part of what you say. I personally am very self critic, but the joke on management was an easy one (and they do have something to do in this topic too)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: In all, developers are spending up to 40% of their time in testing and quality assurance alone, the survey revealed – time that could instead be used iterating on their code and launching new features.
39% spent on the giant piles of legacy code and frameworks the app was cobbled together with ... that no one dares rewrite.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
It's always entertaining, in a sad, depressing way, how programmers point the fingers at things like management (well, ok, there's good reason for that), bugs, team size, budgets, etc., rather than pointing the finger at themselves: "wow, maybe I'm better suited as a sanitation engineer."
Granted, there is validity to budgets, team size, dealing with legacy code, etc., but at the end of the day, one's success, and having the time to be innovative, actually falls on me. Not 100%, but a 51% owning stock, often enough.
And one more point. I actually rarely experience developers that have any interest in being innovative. They pretty much just see the job as a way to pay the bills.
|
|
|
|
|
He said platforms should have to prove they have systems in place to identify and remove unlawful content. The fox would like to discuss the structure and security of your new hen house
|
|
|
|
|
Art is unlawful.
Being PC is not the same as being moral.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Zuckerberg is just talking his book. "Should have to prove" implies regulation, and this one would create a nice barrier to entry for would-be competitors.
|
|
|
|
|
exactly...
He can be a lot of things, but one thing he is not is dumb.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
