|
No - unacceptable. There are people who do really good things for the world and don't earn in a lifetime what these slobs earn in a few months.
They really produce nothing - entertainment by staring at others doing does not merit much above a minimum wage. Everything related to it is overpriced. So that some can live vicariously by wearing their logo? Better they should go out and actually do something to be proud of instead of taking pride in a bunch of overpaid strangers. Ditto, by the way, for Movie/TV actors/actresses. The lions share of the money should go to the writer. It doesn't.
It's all part of an absurd scam where a person feels (and is?) left out if they can't recite scores and statistics that have zero worth.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
We'll have to agree to disagree.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
I concur. Sports, especially professional sports, are incredibly boring to watch - I don't understand the extreme interest some people have in them.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a way to feel part of something without really being part of anything.
Knowing lots of stats and data are then discussed with others in the same state. Team paraphernalia are another way to signal they're (self-perceived) insiders or members (and a way to relive them of money).
You can hear it in hallway - or being discussed between stalls in a bathroom. Rivalries and, in order to feel truly bonded with a bunch of people who don't care if they live or die, they may bet on the outcomes to show true commitment.
Honestly, I find it more exciting when seeds I planted emerge from the soil. Later on, in the summer, and without fanfare, we get to eat stuff we grew ourselves. Amazingly, I don't wear a hat or coat with a picture of what I'm growing so I can bond with other gardeners. Go figure?
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I also heard (many years ago) about golfers doing something similar in which they hit onto a neighboring fairway to avoid a dogleg.
However, (as a non-golfer) I do feel that a player should be allowed the opportunity to hit a hole-in-one on every hole. So, if he is honestly trying for a hole-in-one but winds up in the rough, I'm OK with that. But intentionally hitting into the rough should not be allowed. Yet it has nothing to do with spectator safety.
But mainly, they cannot change the rules of the tournament after people have signed up -- they would need to allow people to back-out and refund their entry fees.
I might need to watch "Tin Cup" again. 
modified 10-Mar-21 10:42am.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: I might need to watch "Tin Cup" again
One of my favorite movies. I like stories about characters who have the brass cahones to "go for it!"
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
His decision must have offended the other players?, and we can't have that!
|
|
|
|
|
Cp-Coder wrote: Their reasoning: They are doing it for the safety of spectators and personnel. People are at risk at every hole at these events and that does not seem to bother them. In any case, they surely could keep spectators out of that area if it were so dangerous!
The safety of personnel/public/anyone has become an over-used pretext for meddling and micro-management. It is exhibited by all organisations with power over others. It's not healthy and it's not beneficial in net terms.
|
|
|
|
|
They're doing it for the children!
|
|
|
|
|
The PGA has a history of banning anything that improves golfer's game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
The company Laptop was/is playing up so I think today will have to be IT Issues on the timesheet. The issue is Win10 downloaded an update that broke the WiFi adaptor, so logic dictate roll back the install so it works. But you need admin rights, which are held by a third party (?, I don't think the users should have them but at least make them available to the IT staff) so have to phone them on MY phone only to be told by an automated system only Skype calls will responded to(?). Find 5 different numbers three of them give me the Skype treatment, 1 is unobtainable and the last well I am still on hold with. The company outsourced IT support as it would make it more efficent(?), call me synacle but did someone get an inducment (read 'back hander') for it... I wouldn't mind but my performance starts to look bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonContracting2 wrote: The issue is Win10 downloaded an update that broke the WiFi adaptor, so logic dictate roll back the install so it works
Logic dictates you're just postponing the problem until that update tries to install itself again, or the next update after that. This is not a long-term solution.
It would be a lot more productive IMNSHO to look into updating (or at least reinstalling) the wifi driver instead.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: It would be a lot more productive IMNSHO to look into updating (or at least reinstalling) the wifi driver instead.
Which is exactly what I said, however it's an operation Can (as in kick down the road) to allow a major / critical project to be worked on. But if the wifi driver is being overwritten by a Windows update, why was it checked and throughly tested before it was rolled out, My lappie is not special, I only have a few bits of software installed that is different from the standard build (strange thing called Notepad++, an XML checker are the oddest)
|
|
|
|
|
glennPattonContracting2 wrote: Which is exactly what I said,
...to those in charge, I'm assuming, because I see no evidence of this in your actual post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, so I'm not going insane (or blind)...
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds to me like you have an internal corporate issue. As a general rule, outsourcing desktop support is a bad move for companies with more than a handful of employees.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh the company is World Wide, I'll lay money on the fact if you didn't use one of our products at least today, you probably didn't leave the house. Also we have to have laptops to allow us to mobile (despite the fact the kit we work on is by very definition static it's sub sea, mostly).
|
|
|
|
|
Not a real meeting - a staff meeting kind of thing.
Supposedly to reorganize (=> some is covering their ass) and reassign for more efficient use of personnel.
Depending upon how it goes, there's clearly a non-zero chance I'll resign (or be terminated?). The one calling the meeting is an upper-management slug and, well, I've found it necessary to push his buttons lately. To no avail! Doing something concrete is not in his job description.
Anyway, this earlier post is very interesting[^]. Hopefully I'll have no news at all.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: and reassign for more efficient use of personnel.
a.k.a. to put you where you can't piss off your current that boss anymore?  
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Well - that would be feasible. I wrote and maintain far too much of the companies infrastructure for that. My current (real) boss is supposed to have sole and full charge of me (he fleshes out the bones on the infrastructure with data access/display it lets him easily customize).
Considering I am (1) seriously underpaid, (2) financially fully prepared to retire at a moment's notice, and (3) no one else has/is prepared to fill my position, I'm really not going to take anything that annoys me and may insist on my salary being brought up to parity with national standards (per Federal Labor statistics).
But I can't but shuffled away - it would be easier and less painful for them to replace the big shot and even get one that can be useful.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: it would be easier and less painful for them to replace the big shot and even get one that can be useful.
The biggest problem is, they usually don't see that... or they are "closer" to that inept boss than to "a simple dev"
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
admitting I am curious how this is turning out?
To err is human to really elephant it up you need a computer
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
