|
"Shifting sands"?? Ye gods, she knows nothing. She means "shifting paradigms", surely?
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like Nina Woodard is an organization consultant. 
|
|
|
|
|
"Sounds like Nina Woodard is an organization consultant.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello"
Hit the nail on the head there!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bro, do you even authoritatively provide access to performance based services and dramatically conceptualize robust deliverables? 
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: do you even authoritatively provide access to performance based services and dramatically conceptualize robust deliverables?
Depends on which ex-gf you talk to. 
|
|
|
|
|
I think the sentences are too terse. They should be longer.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
And you all have to wear funny hats and be OK with it.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
I actually yelled Bingo in a staff meeting where the VP had been talking for about 15 minutes. I think in that time he hit every single word on my "card".
|
|
|
|
|
Do you still have your brass pair? 
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - everyone looked at me and I simply said to quit wasting our time with jargon and tell us what's going on so we can get to work supporting it.
|
|
|
|
|
In summary, the program will be 60-minutes long.
Money makes the world go round ... but documentation moves the money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BINGO!
And I didn't even get out of the first sentence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gack!!!
I was lucky in the first half of my career. I worked at a privately owned company run by an engineer. There was none of this type of BS. It had some of it's own problems but never none of this type of crap.
|
|
|
|
|
A total snoozer that will be ancient history in 2 weeks. But they’re getting paid huge amounts because some CxO bought their pitch. And we can’t get an upgraded server because there’s no budget for it.
|
|
|
|
|
So, if a pastry chef were to give you a colonic, is that considered innuendo?
Ciao !
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cute, but pizza chef might work better.
|
|
|
|
|
I no desecrate-ah the glory of-a the pizza !
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: a colonic
She may have fed me a stupid pill again, but WTF is that?
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Cp-Coder wrote: She may have fed me a stupid pill again
Yeah - she must have. Google agrees.
Who knows what the final outcome will be?[^]
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Here's my error
System.ArgumentNullException: 'Value cannot be null.
Parameter name: values'
... for this mess:
Columns.AddRange(obj.GetType().GetGenericArguments().FirstOrDefault()?.GetProperties().Where(p =>
{
return p.GetCustomAttributes(true).OfType<BrowsableAttribute>().FirstOrDefault()?.Browsable ?? DefaultBrowsableState;
}).Select(p =>
{
return new ColumnHeader()
{
Name = p.Name,
Text = p.GetCustomAttributes(true).OfType<DisplayNameAttribute>().FirstOrDefault()?.DisplayName ?? p.Name
};
}).ToArray());
The thing is, I know what it's trying to do, and the code makes sense to me even though I didn't write it. The LINQ isn't really that bad here. But the error message is just awful. I don't even know where to begin. Time to hand roll the same statement LINQless so I can debug it.
So consider this my part 2 in why LINQ is for the birds.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
I love LINQ. Developers have been using it for years now, with great success.
Sorry you have found another technology that you hate.
|
|
|
|
|
There's a pretty large gulf between not liking something and hating it.
If I don't like it, it just means I'll avoid using it, and sometimes complain about it.
If I hated it I'd probably actively seek to destroy it somehow, and that would be a fight with Microsoft I'd rather not invest in, especially since it's one I couldn't win.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
