Re: Icon Strangeness - WPF Discussion Boards

Re: GridView CellTemplate

#realJSOP14-Feb-21 5:49

#realJSOP

14-Feb-21 5:49

I found the problem. This is the code that was creating the GridViewColumn:

DataTemplate cellTemplate = // code to create cell template, which binds to the itemsource property

Binding binding = new Binding()...

GridViewColumn column = new GridViewColumn()
{
    Header = "...",
    DisplayMemberBinding = binding,
    CellTemplate = cellTemplate,
};

I had to change it to NOT set the DisplayMemberBinding property:

GridViewColumn column = new GridViewColumn()
{
    Header = "...",
    DisplayMemberBinding = (celltable == null) ? binding : null,
    CellTemplate = cellTemplate,
};

And now it does exactly what I want it to do.
Smile | :)

".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

Re: GridView CellTemplate

Gerry Schmitz14-Feb-21 6:53

Gerry Schmitz

14-Feb-21 6:53

Glad it's working.

Might be a timing thing:

Quote:
Resources can also be referenced by code from within the collection, but be aware that resources created in XAML will definitely not be accessible until after Loaded is raised by the element that declares the dictionary.

(I see now you're "creating" on the fly; I was "switching" when I looked back at my app).

It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food

Re: GridView CellTemplate

#realJSOP14-Feb-21 9:41

#realJSOP

14-Feb-21 9:41

It's a binding thing - I was using DisplayMemberBinding, and then trying to apply a template that did its own binding - you can't do both, and when you try, it always does the DisplayMemberBinding first.

Re: GridView CellTemplate

Gerry Schmitz14-Feb-21 11:48

Gerry Schmitz

14-Feb-21 11:48

That makes sense.

It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food

Icon Strangeness

#realJSOP3-Feb-21 0:36

#realJSOP

3-Feb-21 0:36

I have an icon (resource, do not copy) in my project.

I added an Image element to my xaml.

XML

<Image Source="pack://application,,,/Pilot128.ico" Height="24" />

The icon shows up in the designer, but not when I actually run the app.

However, when I do this, it works as expected:

XML

<Window.Resources>
    <BitmapImage x:Key="appIcon" UriSource="Pilot128.ico" />
</Window.Resources>
<Image Source="{StaticResource appIcon}" Height="24" />

Why doesn't the first way work?

Re: Icon Strangeness

Richard Deeming3-Feb-21 1:12

Richard Deeming

3-Feb-21 1:12

Have you tried either:

XAML

<Image Source="/Pilot128.ico" Height="24" />

or:

XAML

<Image Source="pack://application:,,,/YourAssemblyName;component/Pilot128.ico" Height="24" />

The documentation[^] seems to suggest that your URI should work, but I don't think I've ever managed to make it work.

"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer

Re: Icon Strangeness

#realJSOP3-Feb-21 2:25

#realJSOP

3-Feb-21 2:25

Yeah, they both do the same thing.

I guess I'm fine with what I have to do to get this to work, but it doesn't make any sense that I *have* to do that way, unless it's because it's an ICO file as opposed to a png/jpg?

Re: Icon Strangeness

Gerry Schmitz3-Feb-21 8:25

Gerry Schmitz

3-Feb-21 8:25

Perhaps this might provide more info:

Image.ImageFailed Event (System.Windows.Controls) | Microsoft Docs

It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food

DispatcherTimer

michaelbarb14-Jan-21 7:29

michaelbarb

14-Jan-21 7:29

When does the next tick start. Watching how things seem to preform it seems like:

Tick
Execute Tick routine, pause tick timer
Tick routine ends, restart tick timer

It seems like the tick interval is between the tick routines. It is OK, I just want to make sure I understand it correctly.

So many years of programming I have forgotten more languages than I know.

Re: DispatcherTimer

Mycroft Holmes14-Jan-21 12:06

Mycroft Holmes

14-Jan-21 12:06

You have the sequence wrong!
Tick
Stop the timer
process the tick routine
restart the timer.

If your process is longer than the timer interval it clags up the system.

Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

Re: DispatcherTimer

michaelbarb14-Jan-21 12:52

michaelbarb

14-Jan-21 12:52

That's what I meant. Maybe I did not state it well.

"it clags up the system" is what I thought at first but it seems to follow the above sequence fairly well. As I change the tick interval it seems to be offset by a constant. My tick routine has to read some USB analog inputs. It is slow but consistent.

I cannot find anything on the web to explain clags.

So many years of programming I have forgotten more languages than I know.

Re: DispatcherTimer

Mycroft Holmes14-Jan-21 13:15

Mycroft Holmes

14-Jan-21 13:15

Sorry - slang

You end up with queued processes that are re-launched before the last one is completed therefore you need to insure that only 1 process is launched at a time.

Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP

Re: DispatcherTimer

michaelbarb14-Jan-21 14:23

michaelbarb

14-Jan-21 14:23

I like the slang better.

So many years of programming I have forgotten more languages than I know.

Re: DispatcherTimer

Gerry Schmitz15-Jan-21 3:31

Gerry Schmitz

15-Jan-21 3:31

You only need to pause, if the tick event takes longer to execute than the interval if you want a "proper" timer.

And if you're re-entrant, you don't need to pause either.

Pausing implies your interval is "off".

It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food

Better way to access ViewModels

Mc_Topaz5-Jan-21 5:11

Mc_Topaz

5-Jan-21 5:11

In my current way to structure a WPF-application I heavily lean on UserControls for my Views and place them in the MainWindow inside a container, usually a DockPanel. For instance in the MainWindow:

XML

<DockPanel LastChildFill="True">
        <views:Header DockPanel.Dock="Top" />
        <views:Footer DockPanel.Dock="Bottom" />
        <views:Body />
</DockPanel>

For each View I have a corresponding ViewModel. This ViewModel is instantiated inside the View's XAMl-code. In the DataContext element. For instance in the Body View:

XML

<UserControl.DataContext>
    <vm:BodyViewModel />
</UserControl.DataContext>

I like this approach, because I can alter any properties in the ViewModel and see the View automatically change in the view during design time.

But I have not find a good way to access any ViewModels from some class where I happened to need to alter the View through a property in a ViewModel.

My current solution - which I don't like - to gain access of the ViewModels is:

1. Give each View a name in the MainWindow.xaml file.

XML

<DockPanel LastChildFill="True">
    <views:Header DockPanel.Dock="Top" x:Name="viewHeader" />
    <views:Footer DockPanel.Dock="Bottom" x:Name="viewFooter" />
    <views:Body x:Name="viewBody" />
</DockPanel>

2. Do some logic in the MainWindow to setup the ViewModels for each View.

public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
    HeaderViewModel Header { get; set; }
    FooterViewModel Footer { get; set; }
    BodyViewModel Body { get; set; }

    public MainWindow()
    {
        InitializeComponent();

        Header = viewHeader.DataContext as HeaderViewModel;
        Footer = viewFooter.DataContext as FooterViewModel;
        Body = viewBody.DataContext as BodyViewModel;
    }
}

3. Then for every class where I need a ViewModel I need to pass it from the MainWindow in some way.

class SomeClass
{
    public void AlterHeaderText(HeaderViewModel header)
    {
        // Do some logic with viewmodel.
    }
}

This approach works, but I don't like it. It's annoying to pass ViewModels from the MainWindow every time a class need one or more ViewModels to alter a View.

Is there a solution to this approach to improve it?

/BR
Steffe

Re: Better way to access ViewModels

Gerry Schmitz5-Jan-21 22:01

Gerry Schmitz

5-Jan-21 22:01

You're accessing the UC's directly: tight coupling.

Ideally, you should be communicating only with the Main Window; using methods / an interface that works indirectly with the UC's; e.g. "set heading title".

Use a static (e.g. .Current) to access "main window" and any other windows / UC's that only exist as singletons (at any given time).

It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food

Re: Better way to access ViewModels

#realJSOP9-Jan-21 2:03

#realJSOP

9-Jan-21 2:03

If you have a viewmodel for each user control, why is the setup performed in the main window anything more than adding the user control to the parent content control (a grid?)? The view should do all of its own setup, and should betotally self-contained at that point. Sure, you may have some sort of global data, but in the end, the user control and its viewmodel should really be completely self-contained, and the main window shouldn't even be involved.

Re: Better way to access ViewModels

michaelbarb10-Jan-21 9:20

michaelbarb

10-Jan-21 9:20

Look at MVVM Light or its soom to be replacement Microsoft.Toolkit.MVVM. They have there place but personally I think they can make simple things more complicated.

So many years of programming I have forgotten more languages than I know.

Re: Better way to access ViewModels

#realJSOP10-Jan-21 12:15

#realJSOP

10-Jan-21 12:15

Historically (and in my experience), Microsoft's "convenience" frameworks are too generic to be even remotely useful. And the closer you get to an enterprise-sized application, the worse it gets.

Re: Better way to access ViewModels

#realJSOP21-Feb-21 1:42

#realJSOP

21-Feb-21 1:42

You could use singletons. I posted an article that uses singletons for app settings, the connection string for a database, and the DAL object I use to access the database. If you look at the source code, you'll see how to do it (or at least, how I did it).

Entity Factory - Get Your ORM-less Freak On![^]

IDataErrorInfo

#realJSOP28-Dec-20 5:15

#realJSOP

28-Dec-20 5:15

Alright, I'm at a loss. I'm trying to get a TextBox to display WPF's default red border around the control. I know for a fact that the error condition is being detected, but the border color isn't changing. I think I'm just bench blind, but I've been playing with this for two days now with no success. Can anyone see/think of anything I'm doing wrong?

0) I've implemented IDataErrorInfo on my control (which already inherits INotifyPropertyChanged):

public partial class WizPgQuery : WizardPageBase, IDataErrorInfo
{
    public string this[string columnName]
    {
        get
        {
            string value;
            switch (columnName)
            {
                case "ClassName": value = this.ValidateClassName(); break;
                case "QueryText": value = this.ValidateQueryText(); break;
                default         : value = string.Empty;             break;
            }
            return value;
        }
    }

    public string Error
    {
        get { throw new NotImplementedException(); }
    }

1) I have my property and validation routines implemented

private string className;
public string ClassName
{
    get { return this.className; }
    set
    {
        if (value != this.className)
        {
            this.className = value;
            this.NotifyPropertyChanged();
        }
    }
}

private string ValidateClassName()
{
    string value = (this.ClassName.IsValidClassName())
                    ? ""
                    : "The class name must be a valid C# identifier.";
    // just to make sure it's getting called
    if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(value)) { SystemSounds.Beep.Play(); }
    return value;
}

2) My XAML looks like this:

XAML

<TextBox x:Name="textboxClassName" Grid.Column="1" 
         Text="{Binding Path=ClassName, 
         Mode=TwoWay, 
         ValidatesOnDataErrors=True, 
         ValidatesOnExceptions=True, 
         NotifyOnValidationError=True,
         UdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}"
         TextChanged="TextboxClassName_TextChanged" 
         ToolTip="Base tool tip" />

3) No dynamic/static resources defined that might override WPF's default presentation behavior

Re: IDataErrorInfo

Gerry Schmitz28-Dec-20 7:24

Gerry Schmitz

28-Dec-20 7:24

Use this example to "style" your textboxes for errors.

Binding.ValidatesOnDataErrors Property (System.Windows.Data) | Microsoft Docs

It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food

Re: IDataErrorInfo

#realJSOP28-Dec-20 9:13

#realJSOP

28-Dec-20 9:13

That's for setting the tooltip (on error). I just want the border to turn red (which is supposed to be the default behavior).

Re: IDataErrorInfo

#realJSOP29-Dec-20 2:56

#realJSOP

29-Dec-20 2:56

well, i created a simple app that just had a TextBox with IDataErrorInfo, and it works as expected, so now I have to figure out what I did to make this not work in my much larger and complex app... At first blush, I thought I might have done something in a textbox style somewhere, but I don't have any "global" styles for textboxes anywhere in the code.

This is gonna suck. :/

Desktop Push Notifications on multiple devices in WPF Desktop Application

Member 1495324013-Dec-20 5:47

Member 14953240

13-Dec-20 5:47

Hi Everyone,

Currently I am working on a Windows Desktop Application made in WPF and .NET Core 3.0. Recently my client asked me to implement push notifications in my Desktop Application. The scenario is if there are multiple users that are working on the application on different computers.. for our example lets assume 2 users working on 4 systems (each user logged in to 2 computers) and suppose User1 had done some operation on his system so I want that a push notification should go to User1 logged in on another Computer. Also, User2 should not receive any notification for obvious as operation is performed by User 1. I am not sure how to achieve this functionality in WPF based desktop application. Can some one help here?

Thanks,
Kashish

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.