|
|
Video killed the radio star... ♪♪♪
But we still have both. 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
In 1995, a WIRED cofounder challenged a Luddite-loving doomsayer to a prescient wager on tech and civilization’s fate. Now their judge weighs in. Spoilers! No one tell me how it turned out.
|
|
|
|
|
As if our society needed help to destroy itself... 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Civilization was destroyed at 2000-12-31 23:59:59, but everyone was too drunk to notice.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
What a joke; having issues is not the same thing as complete economic and social devastation. In short, we aren't living in paradise so the Luddite (who is a massive hypocrite) is right!
|
|
|
|
|
Companies are obsessed with finding the next 10x engineer to join their team, but 1x engineers aren’t as enthusiastic about the idea. 10x0 < 1
OK, it's low code not no-code, but I think the math may still work
|
|
|
|
|
How can an industry mag publish such drivel? There's no such thing as a 10x coder unless compared to the worst performers. Adding the right tools or frameworks when none existed before might get you 3x, but all developers will benefit from that. The people interviewed in the article are at low code and VC firms, so are either talking their own book or know little about coding.
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Utas wrote: How can an industry mag publish such drivel?
Bullsh1t buzzword bingo? Managers and HHRR without a damned clue? Morons where there should be competent people?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I hesitate to suggest it, but an advertisement masquerading as an article?
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Utas wrote: I hesitate to suggest it, but an advertisement masquerading as an article?
very probably too.
and increasing lately 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Has S(tupid)D(rivel)Times ever published something that wasn't drivel?
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
I think these CTO's are comparing bad developers, the 1x (the ones that write spaghetti and add loads of unnecessary complexity to a project), to good developers, what they call 10x.
I'd go as far as to say the bad ones are adding negative value, so they're more like -2x.
So the message shouldn't be "find 10x developers", but find competent developers.
What I wonder, why am I not hearing this about managers?
Even the "10x" developer can be useless if the team or project is not managed correctly, and it rarely is.
Actually, why not any profession?
We all know good ones and bad ones.
You have your favorite cashier because they handle your groceries 10x faster (this one's even measurable)!
Heck, I know people who switch doctors after months or even years and almost immediately have their ailment cured (or at least diagnosed)!
In the case of doctors it could even save your life, so definitely find 10x doctors.
|
|
|
|
|
'There'll be no more work from external/unpaid contributors' – dev Put a fork in it?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Put a fork in it?
Or just fvrk it?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The backslash was intended so that the symbols ∧ and ∨, used in the Algol programming language to represent “and” and “or” respectively, could be represented in Ascii as /\ and \/, saving space for a character. All your DOS paths are just figments of your imagination
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Re: Backslashes aren’t real
My physics teacher told us the inertial forces are not real too... but try to not hold yourself to something in the bus...  
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Torvalds, Linux's creator, finds AMD's processors deliver a much bigger bang for the buck than Intel's CPUs. It's not a new year until there's a new Linus rant
|
|
|
|
|
Well... He's right. I've been saying this for decades.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
A broken Linus is right twice a day? (Or at least every once and a while)
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
This ECC rant:
The first machine I got to know intimately had 6 ECC bits for each 16 bit word. This was in the days when everyone was convinced that 64 kbit memory chips was the end of the line - alpha radiation from space would easily knock out 64 kbit chips, and larger chips were unthinkable of. I don't know what happened to memory technology, but a few years later we had a lot larger chips, with far weaker error correction. Maybe even none!
A parallel: In the 1990s, I took a group of students, well versed in X.25, to an external presentation of Frame Relay protocols, with its end-to-end error checking. These students were sceptic, asking "But if a transmission error occurs halfway?" The presenter tried to convince them: We are talking about fiber optic networks here, where you don't have bit errors! ... The student were not 100% convinced. Few years later, they were all using networks where you practically never had to request retransmission of a packet due to a bit error, on machines essentially with no memory error correction at all - at most: trivial error detection by a parity bit.
A bit error in your code segment is likely to make your code go crazy. A bit error in your data may lead to crazy pointers. Summations in your double bookkeeping not matching up. Your UTF8 encoded string may refer to an undefined code point. It rarely goes undetected. But in practice, few cases turn up.
There is a reason why you today rarely find memory with 6 bits ECC per 16 bit memory word: It is not needed. It is like the famous British law that calls for a man walking in front of every railroad train, waving a red flag as a warning. (Allegedly, that law was challenged in the House of Lords, but was rejected as the law should be considered an element of the "cultural heritage" that shouldn't be touched ... Brits are Brits  ).
ECC and bit errors is an issue at the physical level, and should be handled there - it is not an issue for the OS (with a possible exception for the hardware abstraction layer, but even there quite low down). If you relate any API level functionality to ECC or anything at that level, the 2020s are not for you.
|
|
|
|
|
It's all a matter of how much reliability you are willing to pay for.
If in a particular system ordinary memory has an error rate of 1 bit per month, and ECC memory has an error rate of 1 bit per year, but costs 1.5 times as much, it may be worth your while to accept the occasional glitch and simply reset the system once a month on average.
Most people turn off (or hibernate) their systems much more frequently than that, so memory errors go unnoticed.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Linus Torvalds said: you get more bang for the buck from AMD processors.
I don't always agree with Linus, but when I do, it's AMD!
My current machine (desktop) runs the AMD® Ryzen 5 2600x six-core processor × 12 and I just purchased a laptop (impatiently waiting for it to arrive) with a AMD Ryzen™ 7 4700U (2.0 GHz, up to 4.1 GHz, 8 MB L3 cache, 8 cores) +
AMD Radeon™ Graphics
256 GB PCIe® NVMe™ M.2 SSD
16 GB DDR4-3200 SDRAM (2 x 8 GB)
Only $622
This would've been over $1000 if it had a comparable i7.
|
|
|
|
|
Does that laptop come with it's own nuclear plant to power it? Yow.  Let me know what it's like when it's running - temp and/or fans. Other than that HDD, it sounds almost too good to be true.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Other than that HDD, it sounds almost too good to be true.
yeah, I was amazed too. I went through the HP "build your own" and I was cheap on the SSD m2 drive so it only 256GB.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
