|
Why do you need stream to load picture into viewer?
Just imagine this:
You(stream) are necessary to play(load) a song(picture) at your guitar(viewer).
|
|
|
|
|
You should just use a "picture viewer". Something like MS Photo. It illustrates concepts such as files and folders.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I want to save all of my DataGridView content directly into a SQL server. I'm Using SQL Light Compact 4.0
All codes related to save function are in a button:
<pre> private void btnSave_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
SqlCeConnection connection = new SqlCeConnection();
connection.ConnectionString = @"Data Source=C:\Users\Dell\Desktop\DataGridView\PMinfo.sdf";
SqlCeCommand myCommand = new SqlCeCommand();
myCommand.Connection = connection;
for (int i = 0; i < dataGridView1.Rows.Count; i++)
{
myCommand.CommandText = @"INSERT into [PMinfo] (Number, CostCenter, pType, ServiceType, Receiver, WorkCenter, Start, End, Remaining, Status, ReceiveDate) values(@Number, @CostCenter, @pType, @ServiceType, @Receiver, @WorkCenter, @Start, @End, @Remaining, @Status, @ReceiveDate)";
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Number", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[0].Value.ToString());
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@CostCenter", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[1].Value.ToString());
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@pType", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[2].Value.ToString());
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@ServiceType", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[3].Value.ToString());
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Receiver", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[4].Value.ToString());
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@WorkCenter", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[5].Value.ToString());
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Start", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[6].Value.ToString());
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@End", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[7].Value.ToString());
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Remaining", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[8].Value.ToString());
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Status", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[9].Value.ToString());
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@ReceiveDate", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[10].Value.ToString());
connection.Open();
myCommand.ExecuteNonQuery();
connection.Close();
}
}
When I press the button, compiler gives error in line
myCommand.ExecuteNonQuery();
'There was an error parsing the query. [ Token line number = 1,Token line offset = 92,Token in error = End ]'
What is wrong with my code?
|
|
|
|
|
Alex Dunlop wrote: 'There was an error parsing the query. [ Token line number = 1,Token line offset = 92,Token in error = End ]'
It seems that the parser doesn't like the field name "End".
Try
myCommand.CommandText = @"INSERT into [PMinfo] (Number, CostCenter, pType, ServiceType, Receiver, WorkCenter, Start, [End], Remaining, Status, ReceiveDate) values(@Number, @CostCenter, @pType, @ServiceType, @Receiver, @WorkCenter, @Start, @End, @Remaining, @Status, @ReceiveDate)";
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. solved.
When I keep the last column in DataGridView null, compiler give the following error in line
System.NullReferenceException: 'Object reference not set to an instance of an object.'
System.NullReferenceException: 'Object reference not set to an instance of an object.'
I have check marked null properties for this column in SQL server.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote:
dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[10].Value.ToString()
If the cell's Value is null, what do you think the result of calling the ToString method on the value will be? 
Remove those .ToString() calls, and pass the cell values directly to the parameters.
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Number", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[0].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@CostCenter", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[1].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@pType", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[2].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@ServiceType", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[3].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Receiver", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[4].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@WorkCenter", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[5].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Start", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[6].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@End", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[7].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Remaining", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[8].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Status", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[9].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@ReceiveDate", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[10].Value);
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
That's not an SQL error - that's a C# error:
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@ReceiveDate", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[10].Value.ToString());
If the cell value is null, you can't call ToString (or any other property / method) on it.
You could try
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@ReceiveDate", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[10].Value?.ToString());Depending on your C# version.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
private void btnSave_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
update.PerformClick();
SqlCeConnection connection = new SqlCeConnection();
connection.ConnectionString = @"Data Source=C:\Users\Dell\Desktop\DataGridView\PMinfo.sdf";
SqlCeCommand myCommand = new SqlCeCommand();
myCommand.Connection = connection;
connection.Open();
myCommand.CommandText = "DELETE FROM PMinfo";
connection.Close();
myCommand.CommandText = @"INSERT into [PMinfo] (Number, CostCenter, pType, ServiceType, Receiver, WorkCenter, Start, [End], Remaining, Status, ReceiveDate) values(@Number, @CostCenter, @pType, @ServiceType, @Receiver, @WorkCenter, @Start, @End, @Remaining, @Status, @ReceiveDate)";
connection.Open();
for (int i = 0; i < dataGridView1.Rows.Count; i++)
{
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Number", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[0].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@CostCenter", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[1].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@pType", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[2].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@ServiceType", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[3].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Receiver", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[4].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@WorkCenter", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[5].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Start", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[6].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@End", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[7].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Remaining", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[8].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Status", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[9].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@ReceiveDate", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[10].Value);
myCommand.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
connection.Close();
}
1- Clearing table doesn't work.
2- When I can more than 1 rowsin DataGridView, compliler gives following error:
System.ArgumentException: 'The SqlCeParameter with this name is already contained by this SqlCeParameterCollection.'
I reviewed the loop but I couldn't find out the reason.
|
|
|
|
|
Alex Dunlop wrote: I reviewed the loop but I couldn't find out the reason
Hint: What do you suppose the "Add" part of "AddWithValue" might mean?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
It adds a value to the end of the SqlParameterCollection.
|
|
|
|
|
And the error message is telling you "The SqlCeParameter with this name is already contained by this SqlCeParameterCollection"
Put the two together, and ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I think I need to put open and close parameters of sql inside the loop so in each iteration I open the sql write a row into sql table and close it and open it again and loop....
Am I right? Maybe I'd give it a try tomorrow.
modified 23-Nov-20 14:54pm.
|
|
|
|
|
See Dave's reply[^] below.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I solved it by adding
<pre lang="c#">myCommand.Parametes.Clear();
The final code:
private void btnSave_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
update.PerformClick();
SqlCeConnection connection = new SqlCeConnection();
connection.ConnectionString = @"Data Source=C:\Users\Dell\Desktop\DataGridView\PMinfo.sdf";
SqlCeCommand myCommand = new SqlCeCommand();
myCommand.Connection = connection;
connection.Open();
myCommand.CommandText = "Delete From PMinfo";
myCommand.ExecuteNonQuery();
connection.Close();
myCommand.CommandText = @"INSERT into [PMinfo] (Number, CostCenter, pType, ServiceType, Receiver, WorkCenter, Start, [End], Remaining, Status, ReceiveDate) values(@Number, @CostCenter, @pType, @ServiceType, @Receiver, @WorkCenter, @Start, @End, @Remaining, @Status, @ReceiveDate)";
connection.Open();
for (int i = 0; i < dataGridView1.Rows.Count; i++)
{
myCommand.Parameters.Clear();
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Number", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[0].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@CostCenter", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[1].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@pType", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[2].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@ServiceType", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[3].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Receiver", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[4].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@WorkCenter", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[5].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Start", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[6].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@End", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[7].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Remaining", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[8].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@Status", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[9].Value);
myCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@ReceiveDate", dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[10].Value);
myCommand.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
connection.Close();
}
|
|
|
|
|
That's one way to do it, but it's the least performant and increases heap fragmentation.
Creating one set of parameter objects and reusing them is a much better method.
modified 25-Nov-20 0:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
You're not reusing parameters, you're creating new ones on every iteration of the loop. On the first iteration of the loop, your Parameters collection will have 11 parameters. On the second, 22 parameters. On the 3rd, 33 parameters...
Create the parameters OUTSIDE the loop, then just set the values inside.
SqlCeConnection connection = new SqlCeConnection();
connection.ConnectionString = @"Data Source=C:\Users\Dell\Desktop\DataGridView\PMinfo.sdf";
SqlCeCommand myCommand = new SqlCeCommand(@"INSERT into [PMinfo] (Number, CostCenter, pType, ServiceType, Receiver, WorkCenter, Start, End, Remaining, Status, ReceiveDate) values(@Number, @CostCenter, @pType, @ServiceType, @Receiver, @WorkCenter, @Start, @End, @Remaining, @Status, @ReceiveDate)");
myCommand.Connection = connection;
myCommand.Parameters.Add("@Number", SqlDbType.NVarChar);
myCommand.Parameters.Add("@CostCenter", ...);
myCommand.Parameters.Add("@pType", ...);
myCommand.Parameters.Add("@ServiceType", ...);
myCommand.Parameters.Add("@Receiver", ...);
myCommand.Parameters.Add("@WorkCenter", ...);
myCommand.Parameters.Add("@Start", ...);
myCommand.Parameters.Add("@End", ...);
myCommand.Parameters.Add("@Remaining", ...);
myCommand.Parameters.Add("@Status", ...);
myCommand.Parameters.Add("@ReceiveDate", ...);
connection.Open();
for (int i = 0; i < dataGridView1.Rows.Count; i++)
{
myCommand.Parameters["@Name"] = dataGridView1.Rows[i].Cells[0].Value.ToString();
myCommand.Parameters["@CostCenter"] = ...
...
myCommand.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
connection.Close();
DO NOT STORE DATES AS STRINGS IN THE DATABASE! Store them as the appropriate DateTime type.
|
|
|
|
|
SortedSet implements:
[System.Serializable]
public class SortedSet<T> : System.Collections.Generic.ICollection<T>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<T>, System.Collections.Generic.IReadOnlyCollection<T>, System.Collections.Generic.ISet<T>, System.Collections.ICollection, System.Runtime.Serialization.IDeserializationCallback, System.Runtime.Serialization.ISerializable There are numerous examples of using ElementAt on SortedSets on the web, like this [^], however, I find using it on a SortedSet<KeyValuePair<string, string>>
if (SortedNames != null)
{
for (int i = 0; i < SortedNames.Count; i++)
{
KeyValuePair<string, string> item = SortedNames.ElementAt[i];
Console.WriteLine(item);
}
}
creates a compile error: "CS0021 Cannot apply indexing with [] to an expression of type 'method group" ... I can't locate any matching error report for this and SortedSet.
fyi: I am using a custom IComparer<KeyValuePair<string, string>> for sorting, but, that's working as expected.
Hypothesis: something about using KeyValuePair results in this error.
Ideas ?
thanks, Bill
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
modified 23-Nov-20 1:47am.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Bill!
For using KeyValuePair in SortedSet, you need to define IComparable for it. Until it's not there, SortedSet would not be able to work on the datatype (as inherently it is supposed to sort)
To see what I say, comment your ElementAt line and run the code. You will get a runtime error as "At least one object must implement IComparable."
UPDATE: Below sample works fine with ElementAt. Where is the gap?
Once we have a defined sorted data, we can access with ElementAt. I put up a quick example:
class SortedSetDemo
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var words = new string[]
{"the", "quick", "brown", "fox", "jumps",
"over", "the", "lazy", "dog"};
var wordSet2 = new SortedSet<KeyValuePair<int, string>>(new KVPKeyComparer<int, string>());
int x = 0;
foreach (string word in words)
{
x++;
wordSet2.Add(new KeyValuePair<int, string>(x, word));
}
Console.WriteLine("Set items in sorted order:");
for (int j = 0; j < wordSet2.Count; j++)
{
var item = wordSet2.ElementAt(j);
Console.WriteLine(item);
}
}
public class KVPKeyComparer<TKey, TValue> : IComparer<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>> where TKey : IComparable
{
public int Compare(KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> x, KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> y)
{
if(x.Key == null)
{
if(y.Key == null)
return 0;
return -1;
}
if(y.Key == null)
return 1;
return x.Key.CompareTo(y.Key);
}
}
}
Outputs:
[1, the]
[2, quick]
[3, brown]
[4, fox]
[5, jumps]
[6, over]
[7, the]
[8, lazy]
[9, dog]
modified 23-Nov-20 4:44am.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sandeep,
Did you not see my statement: Quote: fyi: I am using a custom IComparer<keyvaluepair<string, string="">> for sorting, but, that's working as expected.
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
Sure I missed it. Apologies.
Now, If you are using, you should not get the error. Sample I shared above is working fine for ElementAt, to which your query was related to. Is that of some help?
UPDATE:
Chuck it. It's the square and circular brackets difference between yours and my code. You already got that, so 
modified 23-Nov-20 4:47am.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sandeep-ji, कोई बात नहीं
See Richard Deeming's post for the correct diagnosis.
thanks, Bill
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
|
SortedSet<T>[^] doesn't have a property called ElementAt.
The ElementAt[^] method is an extension method defined for all IEnumerable<T> instances. You'll need round parentheses to call it, rather than square brackets, and you'll need a using System.Linq; declaration at the top of your code file.
But in your example, it would be better to simply use a foreach loop instead. The ElementAt method has to create an enumerator and enumerate i elements of the set for each iteration of your for loop, whereas a foreach loop would only create a single enumerator and enumerate the set once.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's some basic performance data in the Microsoft docs for a few collection types:
Collections and Data Structures | Microsoft Docs[^]
Sorted Collection Types | Microsoft Docs[^]
But there are so many different collection classes available these days, even if you restrict yourself to the BCL, that it would be difficult to find a source to compare the performance of all of them.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
