|
How did you load the grid in the first place? I said: calculate column 8 when you load 7. Nothing to do with "retrieving".
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
As Gerry pointed out you should work with the underlying data not the DGV. So add an additional field/property to your source collection, iterate through the items in the collection calculating the date difference and populating the new field/property, this field/property should be bound to your DGV (column 8).
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
I'm creating a program that has multiple independent processes that grab JSON from different sites. So I copy the JSON results and Paste Special into my project and it creates the associated class info. So the problem.
I paste in the first one and get like:
public class Rootobject
{
public Datum[] data { get; set; }
public Meta meta { get; set; }
public Links links { get; set; }
}
public class Meta
{
public int count { get; set; }
public string version { get; set; }
}
public class Links
{
public string self { get; set; }
public string first { get; set; }
public string last { get; set; }
public string next { get; set; }
}
public class Datum
{
public string type { get; set; }
public string id { get; set; }
public Attributes attributes { get; set; }
public Relationships relationships { get; set; }
public Links4 links { get; set; }
}
Then I go to the other source and get:
public class Rootobject
{
public Result result { get; set; }
public bool success { get; set; }
}
public class Result
{
public string title { get; set; }
public Datum[] data { get; set; }
public int total { get; set; }
}
public class Datum
{
public string type { get; set; }
public string title { get; set; }
public string series_title { get; set; }
public string label { get; set; }
public string content_id { get; set; }
public string airdate { get; set; }
public long airdate_ts { get; set; }
public DateTime airdate_iso { get; set; }
public string expiredate_raw { get; set; }
public string season_number { get; set; }
public string episode_number { get; set; }
public string duration { get; set; }
public int duration_raw { get; set; }
public string rating { get; set; }
public Regionalratings regionalRatings { get; set; }
public string description { get; set; }
public Thumb thumb { get; set; }
public string url { get; set; }
public string app_url { get; set; }
public string amazon_est_url { get; set; }
public string itunes_est_url { get; set; }
public string streaming_url { get; set; }
public string live_streaming_url { get; set; }
public string tms_program_id { get; set; }
public object show_id { get; set; }
public string asset_type { get; set; }
public string status { get; set; }
public string expiry_date { get; set; }
public bool is_paid_content { get; set; }
public string ios_available_status { get; set; }
public string ios_available_date { get; set; }
public string android_available_status { get; set; }
public string android_available_date { get; set; }
public long tracking_media_id { get; set; }
public object signature { get; set; }
public object media_type { get; set; }
public object vtag { get; set; }
public bool is_live { get; set; }
public int medTime { get; set; }
public string genre { get; set; }
public Metadata metaData { get; set; }
public string brand { get; set; }
public string[] videoProperties { get; set; }
public string media_content_type { get; set; }
public object mpd_url { get; set; }
public object license_url { get; set; }
public object closed_captions { get; set; }
public int positionNum { get; set; }
public bool is_protected { get; set; }
public bool drm { get; set; }
public string raw_url { get; set; }
public string episode_title { get; set; }
public object pubdate_iso { get; set; }
public string thumbUrl { get; set; }
public bool isUserSubscriber { get; set; }
public string aaLink { get; set; }
public string dataTracking { get; set; }
public string displayTitle { get; set; }
}
There is more to both of these but basically Rootobject and Datum are duplicated. Any way to deal with this? They are basically two independent JSON sets so not related to each other just two calls being made to different API's in the same program but both loop thru things independent of each other.
Thanks.
JR
|
|
|
|
|
Your create a separate "name space" for each set that has duplicates; then specify the appropriate namespace and class when you deserialize.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhh, fantastic. Thanks for that.
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome!
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
the area how much intersected that part need to be code and change the boarder color allow user to choose in c# windows appication
|
|
|
|
|
We are more than willing to help those that are stuck: but that doesn't mean that we are here to do it all for you! We can't do all the work, you are either getting paid for this, or it's part of your grades and it wouldn't be at all fair for us to do it all for you.
So we need you to do the work, and we will help you when you get stuck. That doesn't mean we will give you a step by step solution you can hand in!
Start by explaining where you are at the moment, and what the next step in the process is. Then tell us what you have tried to get that next step working, and what happened when you did.
If you are having problems getting started at all, then this may help: How to Write Code to Solve a Problem, A Beginner's Guide[^]
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I have run into an issue using "LINQ Where" on a tree structure, to create a list of leaf nodes. After I delete those nodes in a loop, I would expect "leaf nodes" to be an empty list. Instead it contains 2 nodes. Can anyone explain this behavior?
Specifically the application does the following:
- convert a list of folder paths to a simple tree structure
- use LINQ to select terminating paths (folders with no sub-folders)
- convert/copy the linq iterator to a List<node> using "toList()"
- loop over the list and delete these nodes from the tree
- After processing, the LINQ iterator contains 2 nodes instead of 0 nodes
See 100 line example below...
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Data;
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
List<string> list = new List<string>
{
@"\base",
@"\base\001",
@"\base\001\cfg",
@"\base\001\cfg\network",
@"\base\001\cfg\network\mgmnt",
@"\base\001\cfg\network\users",
@"\base\002",
@"\base\002\copy",
@"\base\002\copy\cfg",
@"\base\002\copy\cfg\network",
@"\base\002\copy\cfg\network\mgmnt",
@"\base\002\copy\cfg\network\users",
};
Tree tree = new Tree(list[0]);
foreach (string item in list)
{
tree.Add(item);
}
var nodes_to_delete_iter = tree.Root.Descendants().Where(d => d.Children.Count == 0);
var nodes_to_delete_list = nodes_to_delete_iter.ToList();
int start_count = nodes_to_delete_iter.Count();
for (int index = nodes_to_delete_list.Count - 1; index > -1; index--)
{
Node leaf = nodes_to_delete_list[index];
Console.WriteLine("Removing " + leaf.Path);
nodes_to_delete_list.Remove(leaf);
tree.Remove(leaf);
}
int final_count = nodes_to_delete_iter.Count();
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
public class Tree
{
public Node Root { get; private set; }
public Tree(string root_path)
{
Root = new Node(root_path);
}
public Node FindParent(string node_path)
{
int index = node_path.LastIndexOf("\\");
string parent_path = node_path.Substring(0, index);
Node parent_node = Root.Descendants().FirstOrDefault(n => n.Path == parent_path);
return parent_node;
}
public Node Add(string node_path)
{
Node parent_node = FindParent(node_path);
Node node = new Node(node_path);
if (parent_node != null) { parent_node.Children.Add(node); }
return node;
}
public void Remove(Node node)
{
Node parent_node = FindParent(node.Path);
parent_node.Children.Remove(node);
node = null;
}
}
public class Node
{
public string Path { get; private set; }
public List<Node> Children { get; private set; }
public Node(string value)
{
Children = new List<Node>();
Path = value;
}
public IEnumerable<Node> Descendants()
{
return new[] { this }.Concat(Children.SelectMany(child => child.Descendants()));
}
public override string ToString()
{
return Path;
}
}
modified 9-Nov-20 20:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You're manipulating a (realized) "list" that contains references to the contents of a (dynamic) LINQ query; and then trying to make sense of the count of the query result. You're expecting too much from a scenario that has quite likely been corrupted.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Gerry!
After reading your response, I followed up by searching for "c# modify ienumerable" which reinforced your point that these collections should not be modified, or if they are, then the results should not be interpreted.
c# - Update item in IEnumerable - Stack Overflow
Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome! Glad I could help.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Stellar Developer wrote:
public IEnumerable<Node> Descendants()
{
return new[] { this }.Concat(Children.SelectMany(child => child.Descendants()));
}
There's no need to create a new array here. Just use an iterator method.
public IEnumerable<Node> Descendants()
{
yield return this;
foreach (Node child in Children)
{
foreach (Node descendant in child.Descendants())
{
yield return descendant;
}
}
}
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I'm creating a RestSharp wrapper class. It has a generic ExecuteAsync() method:
public async Task<APIResponse<T>> ExecuteAsync<T>()
{
var task = await Task.Run(() =>
{
var apiResponse = new APIResponse<T>
{
Success = true
};
IRestResponse<T> response = client.Execute<T>(request);
if (response.StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.OK)
{
apiResponse.Result = response.Data;
return apiResponse.Result;
}
else
{
apiResponse.Success = false;
LogError(new Uri(baseURL), request, response);
return default(T);
}
});
return task;
}
It's won't compile on the the "return default(T)" line with
"Cannot implicitly convert type 'T' to 'APIResponse<t>'"
Here's the response class
public class APIResponse<T> : EventArgs
{
public APIResponse()
{
Messages = new List<ReponseMessage>();
}
public List<ReponseMessage> Messages { get; set; }
public T Result { get; set; }
public bool Success { get; set; }
}
public class ReponseMessage
{
public string Message { get; set; }
public Exception Exception { get; set; }
}
I'm calling it like this:
public APIResponse<Disclaimer> GetDisclaimer(int id)
{
APIExecutor webAPIExecutor = new APIExecutor("Disclaimer/GetDisclaimer");
Task<APIResponse<Disclaimer>> results = webAPIExecutor.ExecuteAsync<Disclaimer>();
return results.Result;
}
I think there's some confusion with the T parameter in the method name and the return type.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Your method defines the return type to be Task<apiresponse<t>> but on failure you try to return default(T) instead of a Task<apiresponse<t>>
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
Never stop dreaming - Freddie Kruger
|
|
|
|
|
Ignoring the Task, since this is an async method, your return type is declared as APIResponse<T>. However, you are returning APIResponse<T>.Result, which is most likely of type T.
It's not clear why you're using Task.Run instead of RestSharp's built-in async support.
public async Task<APIResponse<T>> ExecuteAsync<T>()
{
IRestResponse<T> response = client.ExecuteTaskAsync<T>(request);
if (response.StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.OK)
{
return new APIResponse<T>
{
Success = true,
Result = response.Data,
};
}
LogError(new Uri(baseURL), request, response);
return default;
}
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Richard. That did it
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello
I am planning to make an app which could be used between defined times and if the time is not between the defined time then the app would give a warning and close the app.
Originally thinking about making a parental control app for parents and their kids so the parents can tell when it is enough.
I am using C# to make everything possible and I am using a database (MYSQL) to get the details.
The following are my questions:
Which way I should save in the database for different parents the timezone?
How I make the app to use that timezone which the parents defined?
If the parent will change the timezone while the app working and the time when the app can work then how the app will recognize that the data changed in the database?
I am newbie and I would be thankful for example or open source and some explanation if it is possible.
Thank you in advance all of the answers.
|
|
|
|
|
Store all datetimes as UTC. Your UI, of course, will have to know this and display all datetimes converted to the system timezone and all input converted to UTC for storage in the database.
|
|
|
|
|
"Parents" don't set / change "time zones". Your app should use the appropriate setting of the operating system (date and time; culture). Windows automatically syncs the time when it has access to the internet; including daylight saving.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
I have made a custom filestream class that creates a copy of a file and uses the copy as the source to rewrite the file while making changes to values that match a specific criteria. Here is the basic setup:
public class MixedCompressionStreamRewriter : FileStream
It uses two modes: Parse mode reroutes the stream into a buffer to be analyzed and potentially rewritten before it gets sent to the output stream. When parse mode is false, it simply copies the base stream to the output stream. It also allows analysis of compressed data inside the stream because the source files will often have such data. Because of these use cases I had to override the Read method as such (commented so that one can trace where everything goes wrong in a debug session):
The issue occurs while executing the ReadUint32 call in the code below:
public static RecordHeaderBase FromFile(BinaryReader reader, uint internalIDMask = 0xFFFFFFFF)
{
ModRecordConsolidator consolidator = reader.BaseStream as ModRecordConsolidator;
if (consolidator != null)
consolidator.EnableParseMode = true;
RecordTypeInfo typeInfo = (RecordType)reader.ReadUInt32();
if (consolidator != null)
consolidator.EnableParseMode = false;
if (typeInfo == RecordType.TES4)
return new GameHeader(reader);
else if (typeInfo.isContainer)
return new GroupHeader(reader, typeInfo, internalIDMask);
else
return new RecordHeader(reader, typeInfo, internalIDMask);
}
This call leads to the execution of the overridden read method below which is where the actual problem occurs:
public override int Read(byte[] array, int offset, int count)
{
int result;
if (compressionHeaderStream == null)
{
result = base.Read(array, offset, count);
if (!parseMode)
{
long equivalentBufferLocation = MemoryBufferStart + MemoryBuffer.Length;
if (Position > equivalentBufferLocation)
{
long bufferCopyBytes = Position - equivalentBufferLocation;
if (bufferCopyBytes > int.MaxValue)
throw new OverflowException();
offset += (count - (int)bufferCopyBytes);
MemoryBuffer.Write(array, offset, (int)bufferCopyBytes);
}
if (MaxBufferSize != 0)
if (MemoryBuffer.Length >= MaxBufferSize)
FlushToOutput();
}
}
else if (MemoryBuffer == null)
result = base.Read(array, offset, count);
else
result = MemoryBuffer.Read(array, offset, count);
return result;
}
For some reason the *** starred line causes the file stream to read several thousand bytes rather than just four (which is confirmed by the value of count during debug). I have no idea why. During the base class read process, it accesses the following overridden methods:
public override bool CanRead { get { return true; } }
public override bool CanSeek { get { return true; } }
I have no idea why the base method (which is Microsoft provided) would do this.
EDIT: Even weirder: the base method returns that it only read 4 bytes. It might help to know that ModRecordConsolidator in the first code block inherits from MixedCompressionStreamRewriter (the class whose code is shown)
modified 6-Nov-20 22:35pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you've over-engineered and should have stuck with FileStream (and an adapter pattern). You've been caught up in the fog of indirection.
Inheritance has proven to be less useful than first thought; and requires a lot more thought.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
I am not really understanding a detail of your advice here. "Fog of indirection"? I chose the simplest solution I could think of for my needs as inventing a separate class would require me sending additional parameters through a lengthy call chain involving multiple methods COMBINED with the need to use just a regular filestream to perform the same function at other times. The code worked previously. It stopped working after I reinstalled windows, Visual Studio and made some changes to add additional functionality which left that part of the code untouched.
|
|
|
|
|
See. Still no clarity. "Another class" is a psychological limitation, not a real one.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Is your point to help or to show how superior your knowledge of programming is? No it isn't a psychological limitation. It is a practical one. The file stream behind the reader is used as both an indexer to keep instance data separate in a static dictionary structure AND as a way to call required additional functionality on the stream. What you suggest would require me to change a significant amount of code to pass currently unnecessary data, making it more complex that it currently is since currently I can handle separate use cases with the same sections of code (that was the reason I used the current approach). Either way the solution is complicated so why not try and fix the problem first? Unless you are saying that the problem can't be fixed using an inherited FileStream because of its "complex" nature.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
