|
That fits in with something lurking in the back of my mind about my first computer language:
FORTRAN's Mathematical Libraries are the best. That is, after all, it's purpose in life.
"Back in day" I used it to do simulations and instrument automation (things came with, amongst other things, FORTRAN libraries). When I moved on to 'C', it was because MS QuickC came with a graphics library whilst my FORTRAN relied upon assembly functions I had to make myself.
FEED. REGISTER. RELEASE.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhh! I used to love QuickC (I still have it installed on this Win10 machine, though I haven't used it for years.
And then came QuickC for Windows, and DOS started to take a back seat in my life. Then the mighty (as in you needed serious arms to carry it) Visual C++ it grew into, which become Visual Studio (and Angels trumpeted it's arrival)
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
At supercomputer centers, Fortran still has a strong position.
I talked with one guy working at a the local computer center, maybe 3 or 4 years ago; he told that Fortran was their standard language for "everything". This could have changed somewhat today, but a language that has been dominating in some field (like supercomputing) for a couple decennies won't go away overnight.
Then comes the question of which Fortran ... Long ago, when proposals for extensions to become Fortran-77 where discussed, one of the great gurus (Dijkstra?) dryly remarked, "I have no idea about what programming languages will look like in year 2000, but I know for sure that they will be called Fortran". When I stumbled over the Fortran 2003 standard, I immediately saw that he had hit the nail on the head, some 25 years earlier. After 2003, it has become more and more true.
|
|
|
|
|
trønderen wrote: At supercomputer centers, Fortran still has a strong position.
trønderen wrote: (Dijkstra?) dryly remarked, "I have no idea about what programming languages will look like in year 2000, but I know for sure that they will be called Fortran".
Yeah, that is very interesting.
I mean C is never going away either, but I like C so... 
|
|
|
|
|
I believe the nuclear weapons simulation programs at Lawrence Livermore Laboratory are written in FORTRAN.
No, FORTRAN is NOT going away. Ever.
|
|
|
|
|
Days when even a horse loses it's tail? Bull! (7)
[Not my own]
|
|
|
|
|
Not mine either - you win and are up tomorrow: what was the solution?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I finished up the software on the PC side of my father in law's pump monitor (the in laws draw water from a creek) which can remotely track the status of the pump in the pumphouse out in the woods. As they get older stuff like this gets more important. It uses UDP to report the status of the pump - filling or idle (might be another status i have to add i can't remember)
Anyway, unless I'm missing something, the above should be fine and if I am missing something my FIL will let me know!
For this I prefer UDP to TCP for this because having to deal with connections complicates things on both ends. Worst case, if the arduino explodes or something, the PC software will just sit in the "connecting" status forever.
I am waiting on a wifi adapter for my arduino board so I can wire up that end of it and write the microcontroller code. I've got it about half fleshed out but without the wifi widget i can't do the rest.
This has helped with my anhedonia too, so win.
I'm glad my first project will actually be useful to someone. 
Real programmers use butterflies
modified 26-Oct-20 6:36am.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you built a heartbit or something to track the connectivity? UDP is a fire and forget protocol (no handshake) so it might be hours "sending" data to the void without notizing.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
For the purpose of this project, a connectionless datagram protocol is absolutely perfect.
The arduino reports twice a second. The computer on the other end reads once a second. If the computer doesn't get a packet in that second it reverts to the "Connecting" state (any time it's not receiving packets it's "connecting"). As soon as a packet is received the state is set to whatever the packet's value is (one byte, 2 states - 0=Idle and 1=Filling)
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
I see the makings of an article here
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps, although it's a project very few people would actually use. I'm considering it.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
It's something I've pondered on a few times but I don't have a need / use for - it sounds cool though 
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Seeing an article like that might be what convinces some people to start doing something with an Arduino. You have my vote.
|
|
|
|
|
Homegrown SCADA? (My wife used to check the status of lift stations when she worked wastewater management)
|
|
|
|
|
Heh, kinda, but on a very small scale.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: filling or idle (might be another status i have to add i can't remember)
Full? Overflowing? Tsunami eminent? Maybe an earthquake sensor?
honey the codewitch wrote: I am waiting on a wifi adapter for my arduino board
Good luck - every time I tried adding a WiFi adapter to an rPi (as the older models didn't come with WiFi, I think the newer ones do) it was a complete failure. I tried several brands, I perused numerous blogs and videos, never was successful. I never buy an SBC now without built in WiFi support.
|
|
|
|
|
I hope my luck is better than yours. I'm already hip deep in this project!
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
The ESP8266 is a cheap and efficient board for doing this type of thing.
I'm not sure how many cookies it makes to be happy, but so far it's not 27.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
I'm already using an Arduino Mega 2650 clone
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
A lot of WIFI dongles for arduino are ESP8266s in serial<->wifi mode.
But yes, an ESP8266 would probably do this fine, and a lot cheaper.
And probably with the same code.
Take a look at NodeMCU devices.
|
|
|
|
|
The ESP8266 is a NodeMCU device, It also runs MicroPython.
I'm not sure how many cookies it makes to be happy, but so far it's not 27.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Too late for now, but you can use Jeedom[^] for the PC side.
|
|
|
|
|
Using something like X11 or another home automation rig would just be more complicated than what I am doing. And expensive.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure what you meant, but Jeedom is free and runs on pc. And can talk to your arduino using a plug-in that is already available.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
