|
If they ask the question - giving them an answer is likely a waste of effort. I prefer to work for a boss who knows why she/he hired me.
|
|
|
|
|
Instagram is adding new Font very similar to Comic sans MS to its app! 
- I am not using Instagram (not even quite sure how it works.. )
- Still can't understand nor care what's the deal with Comic Sans MS!
But... I have popcorn ready for the fireworks! I am sure some people somewhere will get very angry!   
|
|
|
|
|
Another way to add some emotion to a debate. Not unlike caps.
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't it fine? Since it's for instagram.
Using Comic Sans for the list of opening hours that a shop hangs in their window is something else entirely..
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps they should add a Sans Comics font, to be used for serious messages. 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe you're onto something here! ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
Super Lloyd wrote: I am not using Instagram (not even quite sure how it works..
Me neither!
Do the people who use Instagram care about fonts? Or even know what they are? 
|
|
|
|
|
Who knows... someone is trying to stoke some fire! ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe more. I gave NewEgg some feedback and got an obvious robo-reply, complete with first name and last initial. They asked me to evaluate the reply . . .
Yesterday, I got another email - asking if I'd like to give a testimonial post to their site because I was such a satisfied customer (after my initial quite negative feedback).
So today's joy from NewEgg I should take care of (buy) stuff I forgot in my cart or they may have to remove it. The stuff in my cart? A pair of video games - sh*t I wouldn't use if it arrived free on my doorstep. Wouldn't be interested enough to look at, let alone put in my cart.
So I'm pretty much ready to cancel all email from them to me - I mean really, do you think I would go to NewEgg to buy vitamins (yes, they really sent that to me!)? Their new Chinese owners seem to think business is best run by selling in the same spirit as sending SPAM.
Actually, the more I think about it, the more 85% seems like an understatement.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Personally, if I get spam from someone with whom I do business, I update my profile on their site and remove any permission to send me messages (aka spam). If I subsequently get any spam from them, they lose my business.
Companies with whom I do not do business are removed from my list of potential suppliers.
If everyone behaved that way, email might return to being a useful tool once more.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
While that's true, I also believe that the only thing that can really be done to curb spam is make it cost money to send email.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is that an e-mail only tax is too easy to get around. Assuming such a tax is enacted in the UK, for example, what's to stop the commercial e-mailers from using VPNs to servers in other countries?
If you enact a tax based on the amount of data sent from a given IP address, you'll run into protests from everyone from legitimate commercial users to heavy downloaders and users of streaming services (those ACKs aren't free).
I'm open to suggestions...
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Heavens no. I wasn't implying that there should be a tax. Government already sucks too much money out of the private sector.
I was suggesting that email providers charge for the service of sending email. That would serve two purposes. One, it would remove the sender's anonymity, and two, it would dissuade people from sending spam.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
The same objections apply. If only some providers in the country charge for e-mail, what's to stop them from registering with a provider that doesn't? If all providers in the country charge for e-mail (e.g. because it's mandated by law), what's to prevent the spammers setting up in another country?
I am certain that you'd find enterprising people who, for a fee less than the e-mail fees, would set up a spam server for you in the "free e-mail" zone.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say it would be a community service to return to charging for text messages - think of all the people returning to living in the real world.
As for the two comments with the "get around", I can assure you this will be done. In the US there is a do-not-call-list to prevent telemarketing. So what did that do? They simply do their calling from outside the US (where the law doesn't apply).
But most importantly, your plan punishes the innocent along with the guilty. Some corporate bastards abuse email . . . so I should have to pay for this?
I do it a different way: I wrote an SMTP application that lets me send a 'cease and desist' to the offender 100, 200, 10000 times - and it can spoof return addresses and slightly modify the subject and body to get through their spam filters for a while. It works wonders !
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I have a somewhat different approach available: all of my mail, and I do mean all of it, goes through email forwards. I can redirect the mail they send to me (with an address that usually has their name built right in, like amazon@ or newegg@ ). It can go back to them or perhaps to another spammer.
Case in point: some years ago I was looking to buy a new car so I allowed kelly blue book to give my requirements to local dealers to sent their prices. After I finally got a car (I use the "one bid" method for a dealer: they get one bid and if it's the best I'll come back and buy the car but I will not ask twice). Anyway, when I wanted them to stop it seemed they really didn't care. They all used the email forward I had for kelly blue book, kbb@ - and so I redirected the car dealer offers to one of the car dealers and let them spam one of their own.
QED.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Try sending them snail mail (us postal) insured with signature required delivery. Once some hand is applied to the receipt, send them some more snail mail but address it "ATTENTION" (like on those TV legal aid adds and medical insurance verts targeting seniors with hearing and vision impairment) person-with-hand-who-signed-the-return-receipt. Ask him/her to take name off mailing list (oh, wait a minute, there is no mailing list).
Once you have the hand's name you could address him at corporate in attachments and wotnaut.
Continue with your studies in communication.
|
|
|
|
|
RedDk wrote: Try sending them snail mail (us postal) insured with signature required delivery
That is both costly and time consuming.
I'd rather hit them "in kind".
In the spirit of your methodology, I once looked up the online presence (it was a small educational institution and HR spammed people to get possible suckers students). Well, as it turned out, they had their top staff and board members on the site, complete with an email contact address - well, I can send out a few hundred angry emails to the bunch of them as easy as to the HR directory - and I did.
There was a lot of displeasure heaped upon the HR director (per his unhappy "apology" - for bothering me). When the sh*t flows uphill, as in this case, the effects are quite gratifying.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos, GHB wrote: and I did
Often contemplated here.
I once was subpoenaed by a court south of here because I ended up on a list of names of people who were seeking justice in the state for having been wronged by a small business that "took the money and ran". I wasn't on the list for the obvious reason, like contacting State's attorney and BBB etc and complaining, but for dialing up on my land line the actual phone number obtained by going online and seeing who's who on the products (the product I never received, having it ordered through US postal and magazine advertisement) website legal page.
I talked to the head honcho's attorney's secretary, who had a name and, under the guise of seeking legal aid from her boss, began asking particulars about where I might find the office, send more particulars, etc … long story short the story I gave the class-action attorney who was representing the wronged listed sat there at our first meeting the day of the trial trying to think of ways that my testimony could possibly have added to the vigor of his prosecution of that boss … and guess he wasn't satisfied with what I said under oath to the jury of 12 because he never contacted me again to let me know how the trial turned out.
Sound like a nightmare? Long since settled for having done due diligence giving up my $100.00 for a product I never received chalking the whole thing up to experience.
|
|
|
|
|
If you cut down a talking tree, would it dialogue?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I'd imagine it wood not leave it alone, and bark orders to try and get to the root of the problem. But the converse might be true, and it would fall silent.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
The tree felt pine until it had its trunkate. Now it's more of a shadbush.
|
|
|
|
|
That ent funny!
-- Treebeard
I ought to hit you one! 
-- The Whomping Willow
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Is that a sapling tree wit? Perhaps an attempt to branch out but you arboreal out of us, this time! Ultimately, some part of this will end up board.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
