|
Released as episodes 4,5,6,1,2,3,7,8,9?
Because releases Yoda in charge of was!
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Does Baby Yoda imply the existence of Sporty Yoda, Posh Yoda, Scary Yoda, and Ginger Yoda?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, David Beckham Posh Yoda children interesting will be
pestilence [ pes-tl-uh ns ] noun
1. a deadly or virulent epidemic disease. especially bubonic plague.
2. something that is considered harmful, destructive, or evil.
Synonyms: pest, plague, CCP
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe Griff should lay off the the TotD until he's better.
That created mental images I don't "really, really want".
|
|
|
|
|
I think it wooud be nice if yoda picked a better ToTD's, don't you. This just seems so forced.
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps his illness has left him wringing his Hans due to a Darth of good ideas.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Produce an album Yodaworld they did?
Songs Your life Yoda Up, Back is Yoda, Yoda Invaders, they sang?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
A library called "Yoda Time" Jon Skeet has published.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
Tell you what they want, they will.
|
|
|
|
|
Lukewarm.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
I figured it had to be Star Wars related, but I didn't recall how.
I simply had to look it up to see if you were implying that Luke was a tauntaun fancier.
|
|
|
|
|
Greg Utas wrote: I figured it had to be Star Wars
While we are admitting potentially embarrassing facts about ourselves to this group, I don't know much about Star Trek. And proud of it. 
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 ?!
I felt a disturbance in my guts! 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Why upgrading MS-SSMS have to upgrade ODBC drivers? And why an admittedly compatible update can not be done without total remove of the previous version? And why the update rely on a previous (maybe totally foobar) install?
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
modified 4-May-20 8:49am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like it 
|
|
|
|
|
|
No idea. My code is perfect. 
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
I can easily imagine answers to all three.
Why upgrading MS-SSMS have to upgrade ODBC drivers? It might depend on some extension available only in the new ODBC driver version. Or possibly the new version do not have new fuctions, but essential performance improvements. Or essential bugfixes.
And why an admittedly compatible update can not be done without total remove of the previous version? The currently installed version might be one of umpteen different ones, with all sorts of incompatibilities and other issues. Keeping a full catalog of all previous versions (in all regional variants, for all sorts of architectures, ...) telling which older modules can be kept and which must be replaced could be extremely difficult to maintain, and could make the install/upgrade procedures magnitudes more complex. Chances are that it wouldn't be much faster, either - simply showeling in the new version without asking any questions may be the fastest alternative, and certainly safest one. The installation package would have to include all modules anyway, just in case they were needed.
And why the update rely on a previous (maybe totally foobar) install? That could be for licensing reasons: An installed, older version proves that the user has provided a license for that install, so he doesn't need to present it again. (I've seen a few systems that were like that.) The installer might pick up license info from the old installation to incorporate into the new.
...Are you sure that you know what you really want? You seem to dislike that the update relies on a previous install, yet you seem to want it not to be removed (is that even if it is "totally foobar"?)
I know: Some software (often in huge program systems) do allow piecewise updates, leaving other, old modules untouched. This ususally requires a very strong programming discipline, where any change of module interfaces is a major architectural update. Some such systems also rely on every module being able to answer to requests from e.g. the installer about their version number, configuration etc. So it is possible, but it might require a lot of resources to maintain. For simpler systems, it may not be worth the effort. Besides, full replacement allows agile interface definitions, the way modern programmers expect them to be: Something that is defined by implementation, not by specification.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't ruin a perfectly good Microsoft hate session with your silly logic. 
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
Because it's faster?
Fail early and fail often.
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
