|
Wait, didn't another company buy Skype, a few years back, and "modernise" it?
It used to be pretty good, so now it must be perfect!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I used zoom yesterday to help a co-worker with her code. It's fairly decent. And free.
Is Skype free?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I... think so? It’s been a while. I know I pay to use it to phone landlines, but I think it’s free for voice & video chat.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
While there’s plenty of information out there on artificial intelligence, it’s not always easy to distinguish fact from fiction or find explanations that are easy to understand. A is for Armageddon, brought by SkyNet. B is for Battery, soon to be your job. C is for Computer, your new overlord
And y'all can do the rest.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: A is for Armageddon, brought by SkyNet. B is for Battery, soon to be your job. C is for Computer, your new overlord
It really is at the pre-school level.
I'd want to at least add:Item 6: AIs don't know what they're looking at, because, for example, pictures to them are just big arrays of numeric values, and they know even less about what they're doing and how they're doing it.
We don't have a clue how they do what they do, either.
What could possibly go wrong?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: A is for Armageddon, brought by SkyNet. B is for Battery, soon to be your job. C is for Computer, your new overlord
And y'all can do the rest.
Challenge accepted!
D and E are for Dumb Elephant, the kind of person who hypes AI.
F is for Failure, the future of AI startups.
G is for Garbage, what they are actually peddling.
H is for Huckster, what all of them are.
I is for Inane, what true believers are.
J is for Joke, what the rest of us think of them.
K is for Kill, Skynet likes this.
L is for Ludicrous, what they are claiming.
M is for Manure, AI smells like this.
N is for Nope, what reality has to say.
O is for Orwellian, where it's all going.
P is for Prison, what the world will turn into.
Q is for Quack, not just for medicine.
R is for "Really?", how all claims should be addressed.
S is for Suckers, what the people funding the startups are.
T is for Tattered, like their connection to reality.
U is for Unlikely, which is putting it kindly.
V is for Vomit, what you probably expected me to reply with.
W is for Worthless, the future of their stock options.
X is for Xterminate, Skynet says hello again.
Y is for YHGTBSM, an appropriate response to the hucksters.
Z is for Zoo, the best we can hope for from out future overlords.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
I fail to see what is so special about this wave of AI hype. They have been coming every few years since (at least) the 1970s: I bought the 1st ed (1979) of "Machines Who Think" as a student. The wave we had then was certainly not the first one!
Sometimes it is diguised under a different name. Does anyone remember the Prolog-based Japanese Fifth generation computer[^] mega-project? Later waves have been coined e.g. "Knowledge based".
The only difference I can see is that the seemingly never-ending series of unsuccessful AI projects gave the term AI a bad reputation; that is why more recent AI projects have been hiding under other, not as questionable, labels. Now it seems that AI people think that AI has had its name cleared and can be used again.
Certainly, each AI wave has brought forth new algoritms, data structures and methodologies. But at closer scrutiny, we have learnt that these are incremental improvements, not revolutionary, and still quite far from "intelligence".
|
|
|
|
|
Very true. I was originally going to say "GAN is new", but as you say:
Member 7989122 wrote: Certainly, each AI wave has brought forth new algoritms, data structures and methodologies. But at closer scrutiny, we have learnt that these are incremental improvements, not revolutionary, and still quite far from "intelligence".
It's just another cute algorithm, but nothing closer to intelligence.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
I am in amazement. Thank you!
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like you really need the coronavirus thing to be over, so you can go back to work.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Looks like you really need the coronavirus thing to be over, so you can go back to work.
I normally provide full service mockery from the office. The kitchen table doesn't change anything on that front.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
I am a professional! I only mock people if paid for my services!
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote:
I figured that there had to be a less boring and trite way of saying "Too much time on your hands?"
Pearls before swine, I tell ya! I'm wastin' my bloody time with all these "in-the-box" thinkers!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The legacy about page in Control Panel may finally be put to rest, if feature IDs are to be believed. No one needs to change the defaults, do they?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: A modern Settings app, and a legacy settings app known as Control Panel
I contest that wording.
It should be: "A crappy, annoying, near-useless settings app that has to call Control Panel applets 70% of the time, and a usable settings app that doesn't know how to lay items out alphabetically".
Time to re-disable wupdate on the tablet, then. It was annoying me, anyway, because every time I turned the tablet on (it's hardly one of my most-used tools), it would force an update (usually to break more of the things I use), and I'd end up just letting it finish, then switch it off again.
At least now I might get to actually use it for a few minutes, before switching it off.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Article has since been updated to clarify that all they've found is indications that a few more tiny bits are going to be replicated and defaulted to settings in the future.
As for the original claim... Well they finally replaced the last vestiges of Win 3.1 settings a few years ago (something to do with managing fonts). That took about 25 years; which would suggest that fully Win8/10ing settings is on track to be finished around 2035. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: As for the original claim... Well they finally replaced the last vestiges of Win 3.1 settings a few years ago (something to do with managing fonts). That took about 25 years; which would suggest that fully Win8/10ing settings is on track to be finished around 2035.
Oh, it'll be done a lot sooner than that.
Two-thirds of it won't work properly, but it'll be done.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Two-thirds of it won't work properly,
Since when are you that optimist? I would say nine-tenths
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The latest version of the language development toolkit improves parallelism in Wasm and adds a sublanguage that aids machine learning Sorry, some things are beyond my ability to make funny and/or insightful
But feel free to provide something.
|
|
|
|
|
The days of big team consulting are over. Technology organizations are aligning their budgets to get projects done faster and more agilely. What your boss hears: "Small teams work. One is a small team, so must be best"
|
|
|
|
|
Given that, viewed from extensive past experience, a big team is essentially a small team with extra members who do little more than sow confusion and dissent, I find it hard to argue with the article.
Shame.
I'm in the mood for bitching about bad articles 
Sharkey, 6/10, must try harder
[edit]
I typed "sew", not "sow".
Wallace, 3/10, just forget it and go flip burgers
[/edit]
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
modified 26-Mar-20 3:18am.
|
|
|
|
|
Even if some members don't sow confusion and dissent, the members of a big team get in each other's way. So if something is too big to be done by a small team, having an application framework that allows them to work fairly independently is important.
modified 26-Mar-20 12:36pm.
|
|
|
|
|
TEAM in German = Toll Ein Anderer Macht's (translation: Nice, another guy will do it)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
So instead, we have a bunch of little teams on a big project that utterly fail to communicate.
Companies like SpaceX totally amaze me, as that has to be one heck of a big team, and they actually get rockets into space and OMG land the boosters back on earth.
[edit] And define "team" - are people in the supply chain part of the "team"? One could argue, yes. Is the customer part of the "team"? Again arguably yes. [/edit]
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
