|
Lol! One bedroom flat, with home made mezzanine floors at 1 metre intervals 
No, my wife runs a breeding cattery.
The Spaniel loves the kittens and the mothers are quite happy to let her clean them for her. Just so long as it's lick, and not chomp.
|
|
|
|
|
If you add an AI CBR* module, it will be able to tell if it's chasing your cat or an illegal-alien cat, and so choose to either chase to play or chase away.
* Cat Bum Recognition
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
modified 15-Mar-20 3:42am.
|
|
|
|
|
My only contribution to this discussion is a request that you make this device look like a mouse.
Then post videos.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's try something...
• Turns on TV (after spending ten minutes looking for the remote, because I only ever use the TV for playing PS2 games).
• Hunts for an unfunny "comedy" show that needs a laugh track to demonstrate to people that it's supposed to be funny.
• Uses phone to record a few seconds of audio that contain the canned laughter.
• Uses ES file manager to transfer the laugh-track file to the server.
• Copies the file to a workstation.
• Opens the file in GoldWave, and cleans out anything that isn't canned laughter.
• Goes back to your message, reads it, and plays the laugh track.
Nope. Didn't work. Still didn't get a laugh out of me.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
So I did this interview for Software Engineering position with a startup and apparently I did fine. Now they would like to move forward with the process and do the 2nd interview. 
Lately, I've been receiving so many rejections that I don't even know how to react to this news. Can someone please help?
|
|
|
|
|
Be happy, go there, do your best and go back home with peace of conscience
If they reject you afterwars and you know you are good, their loss. You will find another thing.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Get to used to it?
Show them how good you are will help too...
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Ah so now the shoe is on the other foot, you get to reject THEM bwahhh bwahhh. Be polite, be gentle you know how it feels to be on the end of one of these rejections.
Assumes you do not actually want the position!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -
RAH
I'm old. I know stuff - JSOP
|
|
|
|
|
Don't ject in the first place
Monday starts Diarrhea awareness week, runs until Friday!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
MehreenTahir wrote: Not getting rejected
Means selected. So, prepare well for the next round, and all the best.
|
|
|
|
|
Reality check - maybe you need to improve your skills, or only apply for jobs that you're qualified for.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Second interview, same venue ...
New secretary? Beware the double application form. Since you filled out the first one ...
IF you have to go through that again, for instance, she hands you a form which you've already filled out, ask to see the first one and say "I have some information to add to it". IF it is the actual record (which is what you want really) ... take it and proceed to your seat to "fill it out/alter it".
Spill coffee on it and smudge chocolate bar (if you have one; consider THIS tip a warning). Go back and explain the problem and ask for a brand new application form.
Chances are you've got your original now plus a new form ... head for the in-door.
Leave. Run past security. Exit building.
Technically, you haven't been rejected and you've, for all intents and purposes, added to the list of things you've done, snatched your personal information from the talons of a bird who file-pads for a living and is now failing at her job. AND you can now deal with rejection and have something positive to think about ... why rejection can be so sweet!
(Practically a true story)
|
|
|
|
|
"Practically a true story"
You have lived a terrible life, mon frere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a contrary analysis, see this ZeroHedge article [^]
Then there's the old joke
- charging too little = unfair competition or dumping
- charging the same = collusion
- charging too much = price gouging
|
|
|
|
|
WHy do I get the feeling he's sitting on a shed load of face masks and toilet paper? 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
So if some idiot is willing to voluntarily part with their money for some outrageously priced item then who is being harmed?
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
From the article: Over the next three days, Noah Colvin took a 1,300-mile road trip across Tennessee and into Kentucky, filling a U-Haul truck with thousands of bottles of hand sanitizer and thousands of packs of antibacterial wipes
That's the problem. They cleaned out an entire region of supplies that will help mitigate the spread of the virus. If you don't discourage these activities (especially on what is probably the most accessible market worldwide), it will incentivize more people to participate. More regions will be without needed supplies and the pandemic will be worse.
It's obvious why the pandemic would be worse locally since mitigation supplies aren't available. But there's also a secondary problem, which is that the spread would not be entirely local. If people around you are getting sick and you aren't symptomatic yet, you may very well travel in order to procure those supplies for yourself, further spreading the virus.
|
|
|
|
|
Hear! Hear! 
|
|
|
|
|
Ok. So stores should have multi-level pricing on any object that they start to have a run. First three bottles $2.99. Next 3 $30, greater than 6 - $300. Problem solved. But then everyone would scream price gouging by the stores when what in fact is happening is ensuring that runs don’t happen and everyone gets a chance to buy a reasonable amount. And people would still see the stores as the villains.
What Amazon has done is guarantee that anyone who does have a supply won’t be able to get rid of any of it so there will be an even smaller supply available to purchase.
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
DRHuff wrote: Ok. So stores should have multi-level pricing on any object that they start to have a run.
That may be a good idea for the store. I wouldn't call that price gouging personally (more rationing). A version of this is done locally where I live with bottled water whenever there's a boil notice due to contamination or issues with turbidity.
DRHuff wrote: What Amazon has done is guarantee that anyone who does have a supply won’t be able to get rid of any of it so there will be an even smaller supply available to purchase.
This ignores the reason for that supply shortage - someone attempting to semi-monopolize a market during a crisis. Also consider, in this example, the person is indiscriminately selling the monopolized product without regard to region so the people in that region may have no supply available at all now for a unknown period of time. Amazon isn't shutting down legitimate sellers as far as I'm aware, just people attempting to do something that should honestly be illegal.
|
|
|
|
|
DRHuff wrote: Ok. So stores should have multi-level pricing on any object that they start to have a run. First three bottles $2.99. Next 3 $30, greater than 6 - $300. Problem solved.
Your logic appears not to work in this universe, because:
• It's illegal.
• It wouldn't work, because people who want a quick buck would quite happily go through the store multiple times.
• It would actually encourage people to hoard the stuff, to sell it off when single packs run out (because they've bought them all to hoard them).
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I supose that if he would have sold it at normal prices + a moderated profit, they would have not banned him.
Being a bastard and trying to do 1000% benefit abusing the system and harming others... needs to be banned (and as others said, publicy beaten)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Micro Center does this, at least when they put Raspberry Pi Zero W's on sale. Usually the first Pi Zero W is $5, up to 5 is $9.99 and over 5 is $14.99.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
