|
https://www.donttouchyaface.com/
Sound and webcam on.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
The FAQ is hilarious. Someone buy that man a ![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using highly sophisticated analysis tools (aka the network tab of my browsers dev tools) I can assure that the FAQ is correct in stating that it's not phoning anything home as it runs. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
When someone becomes interested in an old educational show for kids would that be a Blue Petabyte?
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Only if Baby Elephants[^] are involved. 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's all a mistake, he probably meant Pétomane[^]
|
|
|
|
|
As was recently pointed out in another thread: Don't let this guy into an Apple store - they have no Windows!
|
|
|
|
|
When you pet someone's nervous dog.
|
|
|
|
|
I was thinking more along the lines of Peta Wilson.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Created a web site over the weekend. Word has it that Google can take anywhere from "4 days" to 6 months to index your site, or never.
Bing, in fact, "found" me in a couple of days. #1 out of 73M+. They say it sometimes helps to search for your own site. Don't know but Google isn't taking notice yet (maybe they want $ first).
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe posting a minute-long video of your site* on Youtube would make Google index it faster.
*Along with a link to your site in the Description.
|
|
|
|
|
Just ask any of the SEO experts that come to CP
and try to post their spam here
but be quick before we get them. 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you instagram'd it? Tweeted? Paid some nefarious dudes to bot-promo it? Dropped flyers onto villages bereft of human contact? Sung dark and unsettling songs around human sacrifices at a full moon?
In my next life I'm going to become an SEO expert so I can charge a small fortune for completely bogus advice while using the caveat "changes can take up to 6 months to be reflected in your results", with the awesome plan B being "Google changed their algorithm. Looks like we'll have to do another round of changes".
(I assume you've registered your URL with Google?)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is a no-fly zone a PITA if you are a frog?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
yup, it's the pits, literally...
Pittsburgh International Airport, Pittsburgh (PITA - ICAO 4 letter code, PIT - IATA 3 letter code)
pestilence [ pes-tl-uh ns ] noun
1. a deadly or virulent epidemic disease. especially bubonic plague.
2. something that is considered harmful, destructive, or evil.
Synonyms: pest, plague, people
|
|
|
|
|
If there are no flies available, what would the frog put in his pita?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Is that like, 0.5 PITA byte per week? 
|
|
|
|
|
Restaurants should be no-fly zones.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The frog rule: Time is fun when you're having flies.
|
|
|
|
|
They would jump at first opportunity.
Monday starts Diarrhea awareness week, runs until Friday!
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
I toad you not to post this but you shot me down... 
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Not trying to poke the friends here.
But it's amusing to see how few heads get heated up and scream "Peta byte per week?" Heck you cannot work on such huge projects. When you clearly do not know what the project is about.
When I am not sure about the project, how can you be so sure that the project or the data handled cannot be of that size?
My boss was joking about this attitude with the Data scientists whom he was interviewing for the team.
On their CVs, they highlight in bold. The current analytics engine run over "x PBs" of data.
And among the Data Scientists & the Data Engineers, It's a scale of expertise. And among the Data-Engineers , they doubt each other if the other is really working on data of that scale.
This reminded me of people in 2000s. that brag about thread-pools and out-of-proc distributed architectures. 
The previous post I made - I had clearly mentioned, the guy whom we interacted with might have said an outrageous figure just to test our "capacity to think" about the architecture.
And he did send us couple of research papers that talked about solving the Peta-byte challenge.
We never know what's the exact sources of these data. Except for the high-resolution videos.
He said "Virtually unlimited storage" on a geographically distributed deployment. Nobody knew what this is about. I posted a question asking if the requirements are insanely high, what's the recommended approach.
Two possibilities I see.
1. You are not interested to answer the question.
2. You are interested (That's why you reply) but you are quite skeptical about the Peta-Byte figure.
A gentlemanish reply I should say[^]
Great manners are learned from the few good. Thanks OriginalGriff.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
