|
Exoskeletor wrote: how i can store 5 hashes
The same way you store the images. Add a string-column next to the blob itself. Calculate the hash from the blob, and write them at the same time.
Exoskeletor wrote: and check them when im inserting a new template with one query?
You don't check during the insert, but prior. You weren't trying to compare images during the insert before; same applies here. You can check if any of the five hashes exists in the database with a single query though; but one problem at a time - it would work with five queries too, and you can rewrite to use a single query later on.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
which blob? i don't use blobs any more, you mean to create a blod in order to hash it? can you give me a table structure cause im getting confused, this is my structure now
[Table("Templates")]
public class Template
{
[PrimaryKey, AutoIncrement]
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Category { get; set; }
[OneToMany, Indexed(Name = "TemplateImagesUnique", Unique = true)]
public List<TemplateImage> TemplateImages { get; set; }
public string ImagesHash { get; set; }
}
[Table("TemplateImages")]
public class TemplateImage
{
[PrimaryKey, AutoIncrement]
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Category { get; set; }
public int Image { get; set; }
[ForeignKey(typeof(Template))]
public int TemplateId { get; set; }
}
|
|
|
|
|
Exoskeletor wrote: which blob? i don't use blobs any more
With the blob I meant the image you're storing.
[Table("TemplateImages")]
public class TemplateImage
{
[PrimaryKey, AutoIncrement]
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Category { get; set; }
public stream Image { get; set; }
public string ImageHash { get; set; }
[ForeignKey(typeof(Template))]
public int TemplateId { get; set; }
}
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
oh im storing the images as int cause this int represent the ResourceId of the image, i thought that since the images are stored inside the local app folder that is more efficient to store the
ResourceId rather than the image itself (which is a string, my images are vectors .xml files)
Is this a bad idea?
Im starting thinking that this is a very silly idea  because i guess the Resource id is generated every time i compile a new version of my app, so im trying to create a unique hash of something that is not unique
|
|
|
|
|
What if i do this:
1) Get the xml content as string
2) convert them with +s from all the images to one string,
3) md5hash this string?
It sounds like an overkill although, i think i have to read the images as files, and in order to do that i have to open a stream, this sounds very heavy to me, cause i also have to move the images to assets, android can't read images from drawable folder.
I think im coming to a dead end and the only solution is to delete and recreate the database every time the app is opened, or every time i made a new update of the app, im not sure
modified 9-Mar-20 8:06am.
|
|
|
|
|
Exoskeletor wrote: 2) convert them with +s from all the images to one string,
Not "all" the images; you need a separate fingerprint for each image.
Exoskeletor wrote: i think i have to read the images as files, and in order to do that i have to open a stream, this sounds very heavy to me
You'd have to read the images anyway to use them; opening them as a stream is not heavy, but the most used way to handle binary data. Since it is XML-data and not binary, you may get away with simply reading that string without needing a stream.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
but if i have a seperate hash for every image where im going to store it? in the templateimage table? one hash for each image?
|
|
|
|
|
Exoskeletor wrote: one hash for each image?
Yes; since each hash represents the content in the image, in another form. If you have that for each image, then looking if you already have it is as easy as getting the hash from the new image (the one you want to compare to the ones already there), and see if it is in there.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
yes but what if i don't mind if the same image exist but not in the same order? thats why im thinking of converting all bytes into one. A template might have some images that other template have (in the future).
Since i am generating bitmaps for every image maybe is not so expensive to generate one more md5 from a bitmap that will do that
public static byte[] ConcatByteArrays(params byte[][] arrays)
{
return arrays.SelectMany(x => x).ToArray();
}
and then have a hash for every template AND a hash for every image
|
|
|
|
|
static class DatabaseHelper
{
public static string GetMD5Hash(string content)
{
using (var md5 = MD5.Create())
{
byte[] computedHash = md5.ComputeHash(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(content));
return new System.Runtime.Remoting.Metadata.W3cXsd2001.SoapHexBinary(computedHash).ToString();
}
}
public static string GetMD5Hash(byte[] content)
{
using (var md5 = MD5.Create())
{
byte[] computedHash = md5.ComputeHash(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(BitConverter.ToString(content).Replace("-", "")));
return new System.Runtime.Remoting.Metadata.W3cXsd2001.SoapHexBinary(computedHash).ToString();
}
}
public static string DrawableToMD5(int drawableId)
{
var templateDB = new TemplateDB();
return GetMD5Hash(templateDB.DrawableToByteArray(drawableId));
}
private static SQLiteConnection instance;
public static SQLiteConnection db()
{
if (instance == null)
instance = new SQLiteConnection(System.IO.Path.Combine(System.Environment.GetFolderPath(System.Environment.SpecialFolder.Personal), "TemplatesData.db"));
return instance;
}
public static void CloseConnection()
{
if (instance != null)
{
instance.Close();
instance.Dispose();
instance = null;
}
}
}
public class TemplateDB
{
public enum TemplateCategories
{
Emojis,
Stars,
Hearts,
Characters,
Emotions,
}
public static byte[] ConcatByteArrays(params byte[][] arrays)
{
return arrays.SelectMany(x => x).ToArray();
}
public static byte[] ConcatByteList(List<byte[]> list)
{
return list
.SelectMany(a => a)
.ToArray();
}
public static Bitmap GetBitmapFromVectorDrawable(Context context, int drawableId)
{
Drawable drawable = ContextCompat.GetDrawable(context, drawableId);
if (Build.VERSION.SdkInt < Android.OS.BuildVersionCodes.Lollipop)
{
drawable = (DrawableCompat.Wrap(drawable)).Mutate();
}
Bitmap bitmap = Bitmap.CreateBitmap(drawable.IntrinsicWidth,
drawable.IntrinsicWidth, Bitmap.Config.Argb8888);
Canvas canvas = new Canvas(bitmap);
drawable.SetBounds(0, 0, canvas.Width, canvas.Height);
drawable.Draw(canvas);
return bitmap;
}
public byte[] DrawableToByteArray(int resourceId)
{
var context = AppState.ApplicationState;
using (var bitmap = GetBitmapFromVectorDrawable(context, resourceId))
{
int size = bitmap.ByteCount;
byte[] byteArray = new byte[size];
ByteBuffer byteBuffer = ByteBuffer.Allocate(size);
bitmap.CopyPixelsToBuffer(byteBuffer);
byteBuffer.Rewind();
byteBuffer.Get(byteArray);
return byteArray;
}
}
public static void AddTemplate(int category, List<int> images)
{
var templateDB = new TemplateDB();
var imageByteList = new List<byte[]>();
foreach (int image in images)
{
imageByteList.Add(templateDB.DrawableToByteArray(image));
}
var tmpl = new Template()
{
Category = category,
};
var img1 = new TemplateImage()
{
Category = category,
Image = images[0],
ImagesHash = DatabaseHelper.GetMD5Hash(imageByteList[0]),
};
var img2 = new TemplateImage()
{
Category = category,
Image = images[1],
ImagesHash = DatabaseHelper.GetMD5Hash(imageByteList[1]),
};
var img3 = new TemplateImage()
{
Category = category,
Image = images[2],
ImagesHash = DatabaseHelper.GetMD5Hash(imageByteList[2]),
};
var img4 = new TemplateImage()
{
Category = category,
Image = images[3],
ImagesHash = DatabaseHelper.GetMD5Hash(imageByteList[3]),
};
var img5 = new TemplateImage()
{
Category = category,
Image = images[4],
ImagesHash = DatabaseHelper.GetMD5Hash(imageByteList[4]),
};
tmpl.TemplateImages = new List<TemplateImage>() { img1, img2, img3, img4, img5 };
tmpl.ImagesHash = DatabaseHelper.GetMD5Hash(ConcatByteList(imageByteList));
var result = DatabaseHelper.db().Query<TemplateImage>("Select * from Templates where ImagesHash=?", tmpl.ImagesHash);
if (result.Count == 0)
{
DatabaseHelper.db().InsertAll(tmpl.TemplateImages);
DatabaseHelper.db().Insert(tmpl);
DatabaseHelper.db().UpdateWithChildren(tmpl);
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
What if i just give my own unique hash in every template manually? i cant think of another solution, either way im creating a list of templates before inserting them to db, why not just give them my own hash?
|
|
|
|
|
Exoskeletor wrote: What if i just give my own unique hash in every template manually? i cant think of another solution, either way im creating a list of templates before inserting them to db, why not just give them my own hash?
You already assign them an id; if you want to compare if two complex objects are the same, you usually do that by comparing their hash values.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are you trying to compare bitmaps, or simply looking for a way to do an insert-query while checking if there's already such a record?
In pseudo, comparing bitmaps would be similar to below;
Bitmap bitmap1 = (get bitmap from somewhere)
string hashedImage = MakeMD5(bitmap1);
Bitmap compareTo = (get bitmap you want to compare to)
string compareToHash = MakeMD5(compareTo);
bool imagesAreEqual = (hashedImage == compareToHash); That's not helping though if you are trying an insert that does an update when the record is already there.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
I just want to insert a template in the database only if does not exist. By not exist i mean the List of images to not exist in another template.
The only solution i can think of is a predefined hash value
|
|
|
|
|
Exoskeletor wrote: I just want to insert a template in the database only if does not exist.
You don't need a hash for that, sorry for pointing you in the wrong direction 
Instead of an insert-command you usually use, you can use the "INSERT OR REPLACE" command; see SQLite REPLACE: Insert or Replace The Existing Row[^]
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
but how can sqlite know to replace a record? both my tables have a primary unique key
[Table("Templates")]
public class Template
{
[PrimaryKey, AutoIncrement]
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Category { get; set; }
[OneToMany, Unique]
public List<TemplateImage> TemplateImages { get; set; }
public string ImagesHash { get; set; }
}
[Table("TemplateImages")]
public class TemplateImage
{
[PrimaryKey, AutoIncrement]
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Category { get; set; }
public string ImagesHash { get; set; }
public int Image { get; set; }
[ForeignKey(typeof(Template))]
public int TemplateId { get; set; }
}
doesnt that make them unique.
Also, this is replacing items according to the primary key it says? so if i have a template with id 5, and i delete it one day, the template that belong to id 6 wll go to the position of id 5? and so on?
|
|
|
|
|
also i tried in this code
public static void AddTemplate(int category, List<int> images)
{
var templateDB = new TemplateDB();
var imageByteList = new List<byte[]>();
foreach (int image in images)
{
}
var tmpl = new Template()
{
Category = category,
};
var img1 = new TemplateImage()
{
Category = category,
Image = images[0],
};
var img2 = new TemplateImage()
{
Category = category,
Image = images[1],
};
var img3 = new TemplateImage()
{
Category = category,
Image = images[2],
};
var img4 = new TemplateImage()
{
Category = category,
Image = images[3],
};
var img5 = new TemplateImage()
{
Category = category,
Image = images[4],
};
tmpl.TemplateImages = new List<TemplateImage>() { img1, img2, img3, img4, img5 };
var result = DatabaseHelper.db().Query<TemplateImage>("Select * from Templates where ImagesHash=?", tmpl.ImagesHash);
if (result.Count == 0)
{
DatabaseHelper.db().InsertAll(tmpl.TemplateImages);
DatabaseHelper.db().Insert(tmpl);
DatabaseHelper.db().UpdateWithChildren(tmpl);
}
to replace insert with insertorupdate and my template database was empty. id was always 0 in every attemp to insert something to db, do you know why? here is the database structure
[Table("Templates")]
public class Template
{
[PrimaryKey, AutoIncrement]
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Category { get; set; }
[OneToMany, Unique]
public List<TemplateImage> TemplateImages { get; set; }
public string ImagesHash { get; set; }
}
[Table("TemplateImages")]
public class TemplateImage
{
[PrimaryKey, AutoIncrement]
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Category { get; set; }
public string ImagesHash { get; set; }
public int Image { get; set; }
[ForeignKey(typeof(Template))]
public int TemplateId { get; set; }
}
|
|
|
|
|
Not quite sure what the code in the DatabaseHelper does, but it looks like you're executing a SELECT statement, not an INSERT.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
With insert the database works but on every app run it reenters the data.
with insertorupdate nothing is insert in the database, i read it 2-3 times the page but i cant understand what i'm doing wrong
|
|
|
|
|
You're not recreating the database/overwriting it each time it runs, I hope?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
thats why im trying to check if the entry exist, in order to not recreate it. this is the whole point of my question. how to create data once and only check if it exist in the next run.
i just show that guid's doesnt change forever, on the same project, so i will use this, i will mark it as unique in the db structure, and everything will work amazingly good i hope 
Is there any other way of checking if data already exist? i dont like the idea of checking if the table exist, what if only the half data have been created and after that the app crash? what is the proper way to verify and create data in a database?
|
|
|
|
|
Most of what I wrote was based on the (wrong) assumption that you were trying to compare images 
Exoskeletor wrote: i dont like the idea of checking if the table exist,
The table should always exist; don't create them on the fly, define them beforehand.
Exoskeletor wrote: what if only the half data have been created and after that the app crash? what is the proper way to verify and create data in a database?
If you perform multiple inserts, you'll find that SQLite "feels" slow. That's where transactions come in - before the first insert, you start a transaction, and after the last one, you commit the transaction (or roll it back if there was an error). The transaction will be treated as a single statement, and only be written once committed. That way you can ensure all the stuff is there that you want.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
The page that I linked to lets you try the SQL statements online
Hadn't seen that it is a real "replace", not an insert "or" update; but it explains that too. It does look like it honors the unique constraint, so should work with a primary key too.
Exoskeletor wrote: so if i have a template with id 5, and i delete it one day, the template that belong to id 6 wll go to the position of id 5? and so on?
Id's that have been used already do not get re-used; so if you delete 5 and 6 exists, another insert would give you 7, not 5, even if that position is empty.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
That's reading all the images and making one big array of bytes of it; may be a bit much for the memorymanager.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
