|
For large .NET legacy code bases some predictions must be made to plan now a seamless and in-time migration toward the future of .NET. At least four more new branches?
.NET Quark - for really, really small devices.
.NET Onion - so many layers!
.NET for Windows - a new branch, focused on their biggest market
.NET Plaid - beyond everything
.NET {your turn}
|
|
|
|
|
.NET Agile; the new name for MSAccess.
.NET BDSM; only VB6 compatible.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: .NET Standard was introduced as a common API set that all .NET flavors must implement. .NET Standard superseded PCL (Portable Class Library). Now that several .NET frameworks will be unified upon .NET Core bases, and that the .NET Framework 4.x won’t support future versions of .NET Standard anymore, it sounds like the need for more .NET standard API will decrease significantly. Actually .NET Framework 4.8 doesn’t even support latest .NET Standard 2.1: “.NET Framework 4.8 will remain on .NET Standard 2.0 rather than implement .NET Standard 2.1”.
barf !
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
modified 9-Oct-19 19:47pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed. Somebody please tell Microsoft that XKCD #927[^] is not an aspirational goal! 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
This's been known for a while. .net standard 2.1 requires changes to IL and the VM; which would require a new side by side disk space eating framework install to support. MS, not unreasonably, wants to avoid that and isn't planning a .net framework update as a result.
Their decision to rebrand .net core vNext as .net 5 instead of .net core 3.1/4.0 (and push it as an upgrade target for .net framework code) is going to make this harder to address later on. When core was staying differently branded and presented as an independentish product it was reasonable to hope that the classic framework could get rollup updates every 3 to 5 years that did require a side by side install to limit the divergence and make newer versions of .net standard potentially useful for something beyond core/mono code sharing.
AT this point though, unless they change their minds on porting major legacy features (ex web forms) or those that they view as mistakes (ex app domains) to core, they're going to be leaving a substantial chunk of older major applications behind indefinitely. I'm fine with MS saying that doing so is a low staffing priority and the missing parts will slowly trickle in over the next few years. I'm also fine with them having their namespaces changed to Netframework.Legacy.DontUseThisForNewCode.* or to have them unavailable unless a setting is changed in the project/solution files to help warn off new devs from using them. I just want to avoid a repeat of the VB6 to VB.net debacle; especially since unlike where most vb6 desktop apps ended up being ported to C# desktop apps at least staying in the MS world; .net web apps that would need a major rewrite to continue to newer versions of the stack have a much higher chance of moving to non-MS tech entirely. At the same time I'd really like them to be open about plans for long term porting if they have any; spending a few years implying a rewrite is the only way forward only to announce a major feature is now ported is going to trigger a backlash from anyone who sunk a lot of time into porting out of the old tech only to have the need to do so removed shortly afterward.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: Netframework.Legacy.DontUseThisForNewCode
Eloquent 
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
.NET Linux - need I explain?
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
.SMURF Smurf
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity."
- Hanlon's Razor
|
|
|
|
|
.NET TLE for those who Windows don't itch them yet
.NET THER-BACK for those who are assh...
.NET THERLANDS just in case you like dutch
...
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
In 2018, Israeli-based food tech startup Aleph Farms made a breakthrough in the alt-meat industry by creating the world’s first lab-grown steak, a hunk of cell-cultured meat that mimicked the texture and structure of the beef you’d find at the supermarket. Beef... in SPACE!
And I'm sure you're already doing the other, implied, joke about growing meat. I don't need to bother.
|
|
|
|
|
If the “grew” it, it’s not meat.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Not impressed, show me bacon. Then I go read the article and it's an Israeli company... oops
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
The bill aims to protect consumers from unpleasant surprises. This camera has a camera inside?! I'm outraged!
|
|
|
|
|
May contain traces of camera and mic... 
Zen and the art of software maintenance : rm -rf *
Maths is like love : a simple idea but it can get complicated.
|
|
|
|
|
The operating system is designed to work with ubiquitous, easy-to-scavenge components in a future where consumer electronics are a thing of the past. "It's dangerous to go alone! Take this"
|
|
|
|
|
I thought Linux already filled this role...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, but no one can agree on what distro works best with the zombie apocalypse.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
slackware
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Speaking today at the Microsoft Government Leaders Summit in Washington, DC, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella made the case for edge computing, even while pushing the Azure cloud as what he called “the world’s computer.” "Livin' on the edge. You can't help yourself at all"
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Satya Nadella looks to the future with edge computing
I thought they had changed the "edge computing" with Chromium  
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Bravo! Bravo! :clap: :clap:
Dang, but I wish I had thought of that.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
thank you
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The Eclipse Foundation is trying to make it easier for developers to build cloud-native applications. Because they did such a great job on the desktop IDE
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: The Eclipse Foundation is trying to make it easier for developers to build cloud-native applications.
I a way that they can have more people to sue later?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
FBI warns about SIM swapping and tools like Muraen and NecroBrowser. I guess now we'll have to move to "BSFA" (Bunch of Stuff Factor Authentication) now?
Or something about the MF part of MFA and the hackers
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
