|
We’ve seen companies big and small build everything from AI-driven developer tools to AI-powered developer environments. But what if instead of having AI merely help developers write code, it did all the heavy lifting? So the AI posts requests for codez for you?
“and the AI takes care of the rest”
Could someone find my eyes? They've rolled out of their sockets.
|
|
|
|
|
Or we could just use libraries and frameworks.
Nah. That wouldn't work. I hate being passe'.
Gimme that alexa-compatible IoT AI over here! Give it!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Wow! That's rad.
Oh hang on - it's RAD.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Docker images almost always bring known vulnerabilities alongside their great value But the vulnerabilities are contained, right?
"Snyk recently released its container vulnerability management solution to empower developers to fully own the security of their dockerized applications."
What.a.coincidence. :boggle:
|
|
|
|
|
|
he is sounding more like a freedom fighter than a CEO?
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, because backing "freedom fighters" with materiel and weaponry in other countries has always worked out so well in the past, hasn't it.
I look forward to seeing Bill Gates weigh in on this.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Then why he picks the US Army?
In Word you can only store 2 bytes. That is why I use Writer.
|
|
|
|
|
Ha, the response will be: Visual Studio Communist Edition 
|
|
|
|
|
with VB only?
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
No no, it will only have the CCCP compiler 
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: and that the company will not "withhold technology" from democratic governments.
North Korea, officially the Democratic People's Republic of Korea... 
Latest Article - Web Frameworks - A Solution Looking for a Problem?
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
https://gizmodo.com/more-internal-facebook-documents-leak-online-revealing-1832874062
https://github.com/BuxtonTheRed/btrmisc/blob/master/fb-643-extended.pdf
https://github.com/BuxtonTheRed/btrmisc
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
The judge said in November: What has happened is unconscionable. It shocks the conscience.
Indeed.
Unfortunately, the judge was talking about documents condemning fb being legally released to the public in the public's interest, not about what fb has been doing.
I shouldn't be surprised if he gets a swimming pool out of it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively, the employees described a workplace that is perpetually teetering on the brink of chaos. It is an environment where workers cope by telling dark jokes about committing suicide, then smoke weed during breaks to numb their emotions. It’s a place where employees can be fired for making just a few errors a week — and where those who remain live in fear of the former colleagues who return seeking vengeance. Just in case you want to feel better about your job
and/or your life decisions
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Wallace said: My apologies, but I cannot possibly go forward in developing and implementing process improvements for the company, given the input I have thus far received.
To facilitate my function of improving the effectiveness of the processes, I require accurate, detailed descriptions of how the current processes deliver, what they deliver, and what they do not deliver.
By necessity, these descriptions must be unblemished by any form of embellishment or emotional content.
That is: cut the drama queen crap, because I can't work with that; gimme facts.
And that's pretty much exactly what I said to a contractee, a few years ago (you might, maybe if I give you loads and loads of clues, be able to guess which paragraph wasn't in the communique, at the time).
The article is emotionally charged pap, which will achieve nothing -- except maybe bring tears to the eyes of some of its readers (which means it's really in the wrong genre!)
Even if fb management were to be open to suggestions to change working practices (of their subbies, in this case), they ain't gonna pay a blind bit of attention to this "piece of journalism", because it's fruggin' useless, in terms of process management, which needs clear, clean, emotionless statements of conditions.
So they're obviously just trying to snark at fb, which means that nothing in the article can be trusted as truth.
... And I should know, because I'm a world-class expert on process management snark, so I know how it works!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, we went back and forth on whether to include it in the newsletter, but ended up going with it as we ended up feeling that it was a subset of the internet "conversation" as a whole.
see (to a greatly reduced extent): Soapbox.
And yes, a world-class snarkist indeed 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: we ended up feeling that it was a subset of the internet "conversation" as a whole.
That's fair go, so it was a good call, given that it was given the right kind of consideration.
It could have been a lot snarkier AND a lot funnier, though. People who take "creative writing" courses all too often end up only being fit for Mills & Boon.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I don't trust the article. It reads like an advocacy piece, skipping important details. One subject of the article complains of PTSD, but at another place it's pointed out that the vast majority of the stuff being reviewed is benign, so what is the real cause? The material being reviewed or how the company lets the reviewers handle dealing with "intense" material, or is simply a work environment with little respect for the people in it?
The rigid schedule strikes me as counter productive. Seems to me that at the very least, the company should have staggered breaks and deal with the issue where someone may need extra time to wind down for the rare instances of reviewing genuinely intense, if not traumatic, material.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a sh1tty fact of life that those who are paid the least are also driven the hardest.
The Highly Trained and Experienced Manager said: You took 2 minutes 37 seconds to take a pee? I'm docking you an hour's pay!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The shear volume of stuff they're looking at means that even though most is relatively harmless they're still going to be seeing lots of really awful stuff.
ex If you review 400 items/day and 99% is benignish that's still 4 instances of kiddyporn, or torture porn (isis, drug cartel, etc), or kids walking out in front of a truck and getting splatted, or etc.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was once a moderator for a site with over 100K members. Even on that scale it was a real PITA and I regret ever getting involved now. I can think of very few positives from the experience.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
What is sicker?
1. That people have to watch that crap to moderate the content?
2. That they are paid $15 / hr to moderate that content?
3. That people post that content?
4. That technology in general and FB in particular exists to enable people to post that content?
I don't know. I think they are all equally sick.
Perhaps what should be required is that Mark Zuckerberg be required to spent at least 20 hours a week as a $15/hr moderator. Just so he knows exactly what he created and the depth of mankind's disgusting behavior.
Latest Article - Web Frameworks - A Solution Looking for a Problem?
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
When SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket took off on Thursday night, it carried humanity’s entire backup plan with it. It was headed to the moon, the world’s ultimate cold-storage unit. I guess that counts as "offsite backup"
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
