|
It's there. Sometimes (te he)
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't say if it is there or not, I said I can't see it.
Actually, I don't recall to have seen it ever.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
My observation is that some ads have this "x" element (and then also an ">", AdChoises) and others do not.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I neither have those symbols on the right side... weird 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm with RedDk. Widgets on both sides are there sometimes. It doesn't seem to be browser or OS dependent, probably secret hamster business. They were all there in my OP screenshot, but I haven't seen any in the last few hours.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Only specific ads from 3rd parties will get that X.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the info
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
So my newest blog post was just imported and I saw this big GitHub logo in the editor.
Seems you guys added support to GitHub Gists for blogs as well and it works well and looks awesome!
One thing though, it's really small, but at the top of the post it showed the text: "Get started with Azure Functions and serverless computing in Azure. We'll see what serverless computing is and how it's implemented in Functions.. The post Azure Functions and Serverless Computing appeared first on Sander Rossel.."
The first snippet comes from my blog and CP adds the second bit.
They're separated by double dots instead of a single dot and it ends with double dots as well.
If you fix this and the tags and sections get fixed I'll never have to worry about my imported blogs again 
Keep up the good work guys! 
|
|
|
|
|
Can you send me a link to your latest import (even privately - chris@codeproject.com) and I'll keep tweaking.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
This site[^] seems to be copying articles from CodeProject on an industrial scale.
Eg: Compare this[^] to this[^].
No attribution or source link is provided.
Time to send in the legal hamsters perhaps?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the report. *legal squeaks begin*
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: This site[^] seems to be copying articles from CodeProject on an industrial scale.
Gotta love (not) the Chinglish: "There is no difficult to coding."
|
|
|
|
|
First of all... thanks, it is now working.
Pity is... it seems it is not working as it should (or at least as I consider it should to be really useful)
- 1) If a platinum author publishes without moderation it is said: Published by Editor or trusted author. OK
- 2) If a non-platinum writer publishes through moderation it is said: Published by [nicks 1 to 5]. OK
- 3) If a non-platinum writer gets edited by the CP-Staff, it is said: Published by editor or trusted author. OK, but in my opinion not useful.
- 4) This blog example[^] is published, there is no versions history and the author is by far under the limit to avoid moderation by himself (1,3k total). It is said: Approved by editor or trusted author. Maybe a problem with the type blog?
- 5) This article A Working TCP Client and Server With SSL[^] is from an author without enough reputation to avoid moderation (9k total) has 25 versions (CP-Staff editions were 23, 15, 11, 8 and 6) but it is said: approved by editor or trusted writer. So it seems that the highest status received in the past remains active for the rest.
In an example of #2 I saw high rep members as approvers, which means for me that the "approved author" only refers to the one publishing and not to the one voting.
The biggest problem and reason for this suggestion is and has always been to try to stop systematical approvers that click on OK for articles that are spam, very low quality, have serious format problems and similar things. Which means, if we can't really see who is approving every version, then it brings no additional value.
CP-Editors are hard workers (thank you and kudos for it), but if they do an edition with the best intentions, then we can't use the information anymore, because the articles get approved by "editor" and the status remain for future updates as in #5
I think that the best would be to save the "published by" within the versions history (if possible) and...
- if CP-Staff edits an article in moderation and is published for the 1st time, then "approved by editor or trusted author" as now,
but
- if the article was already published then keep the last "approved by" list (as a kind of "ghost" editor)... that would do the job.
[Edit] Typos corrected
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 28-Aug-18 18:14pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
That might happens when the article is sent to "submit[at]cp..."
If the author does nothing here using the CP-Editor...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Which makes a lot of sense, and probably shouldn't be changed.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with you and it actually is a point not that relevant for what I am asking for, because it at least is consequent. I mean: message approved by and versions history match.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Seems logical. Never used that 'feature' so it didn't cross my mind 
|
|
|
|
|
Fair points. Let me dig in a little and see what we can do to make more useful.
Thanks for the feedback.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
You are welcome.
And thank you too for taking it in consideration.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris...
Sorry, I bring a new point to dig about.
This item[^] was in moderation as an article, and it got approved after edition by the staff, then auto approved and it says "approved by editor or trusted writer" as I listed above. So far so good, but...
I have taken a look in the revisions list:
I am in the list of approvers, but I don't think I approved it. I did use the red flag though, to say "wrong type (tip, blog, article)" as I have done again.
@AkhilMittal, @ppolymorphe, @BryianTan, @User-59241 did you approve it? Or did you report it as well? (If report... which option? just in case it is useful for Chris' digging)
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I don’t think I approved it. I think I reported it with a note “ maybe tip”
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
Hello CP,
I am an avid member and love to help the community. I loved Code Project. But recently I found something that hurt me badly and left me shocked.
I have been answering the community people. But I found that someone has downvoted all my articles and answers posted within an hour. So it looks like this not genuine downvoting.
This should be taken care to maintain the standard. Please correct me I am wrong.
Thanks & Regards
Puneet Goel
Save Paper >> Save Tree >> Save Humanity
|
|
|
|
|
I cannot see any downvotes on your articles, but the two answers that got downvoted look more like comments. Perhaps you have made a comment that someone took offence to.
But in the grand scheme of things, votes will not buy you a new car, so just accept it as part of life in a public forum.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
