|
Thanks for the reply. Don't see exactly how this code snippet is gonna solve my exact problem, but thanks anyways  .
Original Griff's code for getting the moving average of the last five values works , but problem is as I mentioned that I am getting moving average of last 5 values displayed on the screen and they are from different sensors so that obviously gives undesirable result.
I need to make some sort of array to store my past values for the respective sensors and than apply the GetMovingAverage() on each of the stored arrays.
The thing is I don't know how to do that   
|
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, you could have a dictionary of moving average objects; one for each sensor. It shouldn't be too hard for you to modify Griff's code to do this (hint, each sensor would be a key in the dictionary).
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
The difference between my Solution and the Solution from OG is that my Solution don't need an Array for building a single Average. Another difference is that the smoothing is variable.
If you want to build also an average from the average of some sensors you need to add the values of the sensor-averages and divide it throught the count of the sensors which are added.
But that was allready mentioned by OG ... where do you stuck there ?
SumAverage := (Sensor_1_Average + Sensor_2_Average + Sensor_3_Average + Sensor_4_Average + Sensor_5_Average) / 5.0 ;
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, OG's Moving Average works fine. The problem is I am not able to apply it to the proper values.
It should be simple thing to fix, but its not.
As I said in one of the posts above. I get the Moving Average, means I get the average of the last 5 numbers , but I need to get it for each sensor column not row wise as I am currently. See the explanation below.
Ho do I fix that ??
TimeStamp AI.1 AI.2 AI.3 AI.4 AI.5 AI.6 AI.7
13:29:05.091 0.726 0.249 0.771 0.294 0.816 0.338 0.861
13:30:40.325 0.817 0.111 0.404 0.698 0.991 0.284 0.962
13:31:19.709 0.768 0.467 0.166 0.865 0.564 0.263 0.915
13:32:00.943 0.558 0.772 0.985 0.198 0.412 0.625 0.594
13:32:31.391 0.206 0.658 0.109 0.560 0.012 0.463 0.720
What happens is that program calculates average of the last five numbers in the text box which means in this case Moving Average=(0.109+0.560+0.012+0.463+0.720)/5=0.373.
While the moving average for example for AI.1 would be:(0.726+0.817+0.758+0.558+0.206)/5=0.615
This is obviously Wrong as I am getting average of the values from different sensors.
I need average of the last five values for Sensor AI.1, AI2,....etc
So I need to make some more changes to get this done.
|
|
|
|
|
You should read carefully what is suggested to you ...
I would say : all what you need is told to you ...
|
|
|
|
|
A new day and I will try it once more to explain.
The fact is : you don't understand what you got suggested.
The Solution from OG and also the Solution from me builds the "moving Average" from the incoming values from ONE sensor - not from one timestanp.
So - what both Solutions are doing is : take the raw-value of one sensor (that means the incoming actual value) and build an average with the saved/stored values from the same sensor - that means the values before). By this you get a kind of smoothing of the incoming values. The return-value (the result) of the posted method should be stored by you in your table.
I suppose that you completly misunderstood the made Suggestions.
If you now still don't know how to get further you should post your actual method which writes the incoming values in your table (or List or whatever). Perhaps then we could explain you the mistake you make ...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi again Ralf and thanks for the patience. I understood what OG's method does in terms of the result I got. My problem is now how do I make this list to store my numbers that get generated by the GetAnalog Method.
I would need to have historical analog values for each Sensor and then apply OG's method on each sensor array or list , whatever is made.
Here is the GetAnalogMethod() from the Sensor.cs class,
public double GetAnalogValue(double minAnalogVolt=0.00F,double maxAnalogVolt=1.00F)
{
if(minAnalogVolt <= AnalogVal && AnalogVal<= maxAnalogVolt)
AnalogVal = rSensVal.NextDouble();
return AnalogVal;
}
In here I call this GetAnalogValue() method to generate "random" analog values for each of my sensor IDs:
for (int id = 0; id < maxAI; id++)
{
double AnalogSensorValues = sObj[id].GetAnalogValue();
sTxt = AnalogSensorValues.ToString("F3");
textSensorValues.Text += sTxt + " ";
txtFilterValues.Text = fTx1;
txtFilterValues.Text = GetMovingAverage(AnalogSensorValues).ToString("F3");
}
If you see above I store all my sensor ID values in a double variable I call AnalogSensorValues.I should have ideally have had a list so that each value gets stored and can be accessed so that GetMoving Average() method can be applied to it.
So yes, that is my problem. Basically sorting these values in a List. This may sound silly, but I don't know how to do it
modified 17-Feb-18 6:42am.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure if I got you right ...
Basicly your 2nd code-snippet looks good. But ... what do you want to see in your Textbox 'txtFilterValues' ?
Inside your loop you are overwriting each stored text with the new one ...
My 2nd problem with your code is :
You are using the method 'GetMovingAverage' completely wrong, because it builds it's average (as I described before) from it's own stored values (that you used for the method before).
So your loop must be complete different (and in my opinion the posted method doesn't really solve your problem).
Try as code something like this :
double AnalogSensorAverage
for (int id = 0; id < maxAI; id++)
{
double AnalogSensorValues = sObj[id].GetAnalogValue();
AnalogSensorAverage = GetMovingAverage(AnalogSensorValues);
sTxt = AnalogSensorValues.ToString("F3");
textSensorValues.Text += sTxt + " ";
}
txtFilterValues.Text = AnalogSensorAverage.ToString("F3");
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK ... in your code snippet (before my last response) I haven't seen (or realized) that your loop works with the Analogue Inputs - not the different values from each Input (in that case my posted Solution has matched).
So you have another loop (outside the AI-Loop) which takes the samples ...?
I will create another code-suggestion for you which works with an array you need. But now (and that is what you really wanted to have) you would get a method which builds an Average at the end of the meassurering - not moving. The difference is : Moving means during and not at the End ...
One moment please ...
|
|
|
|
|
double[,] AnalogSensorValue = new double[7,6];
for (int cycle = 1; cycle <= 5; cycle++)
{
for (int sensor = 0; sensor <= 6; sensor++)
{
AnalogSensorValue[sensor, cycle] = 1234;
}
}
for (int sensor = 0; sensor <= 6; sensor++)
{
AnalogSensorValue[sensor, 0] = 0;
for (int cycle = 1; cycle <= 5; cycle++)
{
AnalogSensorValue[sensor, 0] += AnalogSensorValue[sensor, cycle];
}
AnalogSensorValue[sensor, 0] /= 5;
}
programming in C# is not my favourite ... 
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks a lot.Have some questions. Trying to understand your code.
You are running 5 cycles to save 5 sensor values?
What is the measuring value you are referring to?
Are you talking about:
Analogsensorvalues=sObj[id].GetDigitalValue();
Because this is where and how I actually enter or get the randomly generated sensor values from the Sensor.cs class.
for (int cycle = 1; cycle <= 5; cycle++)
{
for (int sensor = 0; sensor <= 6; sensor++)
{
AnalogSensorValue[sensor, cycle] = AnalogSensorValues;
txtNumberWritings.Text += sensor.ToString();
}
}
I tired something here, but not really sure if I understood how I am suppose to store my values.
I am just getting 0,1,2,3,4,5,6 in the text box
If the code works as intended I should be getting values I have for each sensor?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes ... I'm talking about that assignment
Analogsensorvalues=sObj[id].GetDigitalValue();
This couldn't be tested by me. But you have to realize that in my "method" the variable 'id' isn't used. I guess you you replace it by my loop-variable 'sensor'.
Inside the loop which you refer you assign 'sensor.toString' to the Textbox. That isn't correct - here you have to assign 'AnalogSensorValues.toString' as you have done before.
If you make all changes to my code-snippet as necessary the code should work as you want ...
If not please provide your actual code - apologize that my code-suggestion wasn't better ... but because C# isn't my 1st choice for coding I had to test my code before providing - so some of your assignments couldn't be made by me because I didn't have your complete project ...
Waiting for your Feedback ...
|
|
|
|
|
I created a class for MovingAverageFilter.
The only little problem I have left is implementing an automatic sampling by ticking off check box. Struggling with that at the moment.
Also I guess I do not have proper Random numbers as I always start off from the same Seed No., would be great to Randomize that properly, so that it creates completely new numbers next time I run the app.
See my code:
Main Form1.cs
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Data;
using System.Drawing;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.IO;
using System.Xml.Linq;
using System.Windows.Forms;
using System.Globalization;
using System.Linq;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Collections;
namespace DAQ_Simulator
{
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
int counter;
int count_lines;
System.Timers.Timer t;
int LoggingTime=56;
int LogTimeLeft;
float SamplingTime = 5.9f;
private int clickcounterSampling;
private DateTime datetime;
private DateTime datetime2;
private DateTime NextLoggingTime;
int maxAI = 7;
int maxDI = 3;
int maxSid = 9;
String SensorText;
String sTxt1;
String fTxt;
Sensor[] SensorObject = new Sensor[10];
MA_Filter[] FilterObject = new MA_Filter[10];
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
for (counter = 0; counter < maxSid; counter++)
{
SensorObject[counter] = new Sensor(counter);
FilterObject[counter] = new MA_Filter(counter);
}
}
private void displaySensorData(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
}
private void groupSampl_Enter(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
}
private void textSampling_TextChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
}
private void btnSampling_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
txtNextSamplingTime.Text = "5.9sec";
clickcounterSampling++;
if (clickcounterSampling == 1)
{
txtSensorValues.Text = "TimeStamp AI.1, AI.2, AI.3, AI.4, AI.5, AI.6, AI.7, DI.1, DI.2, DI.3" + "\r\n";
txtFilterValues.Text = "AI.1, AI.2, AI.3, AI.4, AI.5, AI.6, AI.7" ;
}
if (clickcounterSampling >= 5)
{ txtFilterValues.Text += "\r\n"; }
if (SamplingTime <= 0)
{
SamplingTime = SamplingTime + 5.9f;
}
if (SamplingTime <= 5.9f && SamplingTime >= 0)
{
btnSampling.Enabled = false;
}
timer1 = new System.Windows.Forms.Timer();
timer1.Tick += new EventHandler(timer1_Tick);
timer1.Interval = 1000;
timer1.Start();
datetime2 = DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(5).AddMilliseconds(900);
String time2 = datetime2.ToString("HH:mm:ss.FFF", CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);
textSampling.Text = time2;
count_lines = txtFilterValues.Lines.Length;
count_lines =count_lines- 1;
txtNumberWritings.Text = count_lines.ToString();
Sampling();
}
private void groupLogg_Enter(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
}
private void labelLoggingText_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
}
private void btnLogging_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (LoggingTime == 0)
{
LoggingTime = LoggingTime + 56;
}
if (LoggingTime <= 56 && LoggingTime >= 0)
{
btnLogging.Enabled = false;
}
timer2 = new System.Windows.Forms.Timer();
timer2.Tick += new EventHandler(timer2_Tick);
timer2.Interval = 1000;
timer2.Start();
txtLogging.Text = LoggingTime.ToString();
NextLoggingTime = DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(4);
String time3 = NextLoggingTime.ToString("HH:mm:ss.FFF", CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);
txtLogging.Text =time3;
Logging();
}
private void timer1_Tick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
SamplingTime--;
txtNextSamplingTime.Text = SamplingTime.ToString("F2")+"sec";
if (SamplingTime <= 0)
{
timer1.Stop();
btnSampling.Enabled = true;
txtNextSamplingTime.Clear();
}
}
private void Sampling()
{
datetime = DateTime.Now;
txtSensorValues.Text += datetime.ToString("HH:mm:ss.FFF", CultureInfo.InvariantCulture) + " ";
double[] AnalogSensorValues = new double[maxAI];
for (int id = 0; id < maxAI; id++)
{
AnalogSensorValues[id] = SensorObject[id].GetAnalogValue();
double filter=+FilterObject[id].CalculateMovingAverage(AnalogSensorValues[id]);
SensorText = AnalogSensorValues[id].ToString("F3");
fTxt = filter.ToString("F3");
txtSensorValues.Text += SensorText + " ";
if (clickcounterSampling >= 5)
{
txtFilterValues.Text += " " + fTxt + " ";
}
}
for (int id = maxSid - maxDI; id < maxSid; id++)
{
int DigitalSensorValues = SensorObject[id].GetDigitalValue();
sTxt1 = DigitalSensorValues.ToString();
txtSensorValues.Text += " " + sTxt1 + " ";
}
txtSensorValues.Text += "\r\n";
}
private void helpToolStripMenuItem_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
MessageBox.Show("This is a DAQ Simulator that recieves 7analog and 3 digital signals and displayes the values in a textbox." +
"Raw measuremnt data is filtered with a Moving Average filter where average of the 5 last measuremnts are displayed","Input Information",System.Windows.Forms.MessageBoxButtons.OK);
}
private void Logging()
{
SaveFileDialog saveFileDialog1 = new SaveFileDialog();
if (saveFileDialog1.ShowDialog() == DialogResult.OK)
{
using (Stream s = File.Open(saveFileDialog1.FileName,FileMode.CreateNew))
using (StreamWriter sw = new StreamWriter(s))
{
sw.WriteLine(txtSensorValues.Text+txtSensorValues);
textFilePath.Text = string.Format("{0}", openFileDialog1.FileName);
}
textFilePath.Text = saveFileDialog1.FileName.ToString();
}
}
private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
}
private void folderBrowserDialog1_HelpRequest(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
}
private void textBox1_KeyPress(object sender, KeyPressEventArgs e)
{
}
private void timer2_Tick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
LoggingTime--;
txtNextLogg.Text = LoggingTime.ToString()+"sec";
if (LoggingTime <= 0)
{
timer2.Stop();
btnLogging.Enabled = true;
txtNextLogg.Clear();
txtNextLogg.Text = "56 sec";
}
}
private void chckAutSampl_CheckedChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
if (chckAutSampl.Enabled==true)
{
SamplingTime--;
txtNextSamplingTime.Text = SamplingTime.ToString("F2") + "sec";
if (SamplingTime <= 0)
{
timer3.Stop();
txtNextSamplingTime.Clear();
}
timer3 = new System.Windows.Forms.Timer();
timer3.Tick += new EventHandler(timer1_Tick);
timer3.Interval = 1000;
timer3.Start();
}
}
private void timer3_Tick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
SamplingTime--;
txtNextSamplingTime.Text = SamplingTime.ToString("F2") + "sec";
if (SamplingTime <= 0)
{
timer3.Stop();
chckAutSampl.Enabled = false;
txtNextSamplingTime.Clear();
}
}
}
}
Sensor class,
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace DAQ_Simulator
{
public class Sensor
{
double AnalogVal;
int DigVal;
int sId;
Random rSensVal;
public Sensor(int id)
{
sId = id;
rSensVal = new Random(id);
AnalogVal = 0.0F;
}
public double GetAnalogValue(double minAnalogVolt=0.00F,double maxAnalogVolt=1.00F)
{
if(minAnalogVolt <= AnalogVal && AnalogVal<= maxAnalogVolt)
AnalogVal = rSensVal.NextDouble();
return AnalogVal;
}
public int GetDigitalValue(int digMin = 0, int digMax = 1)
{
DigVal = rSensVal.Next(0,2);
return DigVal;
}
public int GetSensId()
{
return sId;
}
}
}
Moving Average Filter Class,
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace DAQ_Simulator
{
public class MA_Filter
{
public double[] samples = new double[5];
public int index;
public int count;
public MA_Filter(int id)
{
count = 0;
index = 0;
}
public double CalculateMovingAverage(double newVal)
{
if (count != samples.Length) count++;
samples[index++] = newVal;
if (index == samples.Length) index = 0;
double sum = 0.0;
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)
{
sum += samples[i];
}
return sum / (double)(count);
}
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Well ... very good if it works now.
What I like to know now : for what is that good ? OK ... you have a kind of Simulation ... but what is the final goal ? Do you want to communicate with a PLC which will give you Values of a Meassurement ? In that case you should realize that a PLC (or something similar) will give you each Millisecond a new Value ... and those Values (of course) need to be smoothed - but continiuesly. Or is the goal something complete different ?
|
|
|
|
|
I just did an assignment for a specific course I am doing at the Uni.This was just meant as a simulation so there really is no further goal behind this. Sensors were suppose to simulate signals from field instruments I guess.
Thanks for the help Ralf Maier.
|
|
|
|
|
Into the deep...
double[] values = new double[] { 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0 };
double avg = ( values.Length > 0 ) ? values.Reverse().Take( 5 ).Average() : 0;
Console.WriteLine( $"Avg: {avg}" );
"(I) am amazed to see myself here rather than there ... now rather than then".
― Blaise Pascal
|
|
|
|
|
I need a simple Service which will do the next:
1. Use an SDK to convert some files;
2. Call Windows processes;
3. Work synchronous (only one active thread);
4. Call from a WCF service in another Server;
I want to select this service (Web API2, WCF, WebSocket, etc.) which will be easy to support and will use fewer resources. What will you choose?
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
Pick the one with the "best" examples. Test it.
If it performs satisfactorily (which it usually does), you're done.
Nothing to do with "fewest" or "easiest"; it's not that "big".
"(I) am amazed to see myself here rather than there ... now rather than then".
― Blaise Pascal
|
|
|
|
|
i am looking for some suggestion. suppose i will install a winform apps in a pc which will stop after when reach expiry date. so what i need to do....when i will install the apps then i will store installation date and expiry date in db. so every try when software will start then check the system date <= expiry date if yes then process else show a message trial period over.
but the problem is if user is cleaver enough then he every day change his system date to software installation date. so my checking for expiry date will never reach and he will use my software.
suppose user may not have internet connection. so give me suggestion how can i design trial version independent of system date. looking for good discussion. thanks
|
|
|
|
|
You are looking for license management. There are numerous articles that can help you with this; a quick google will find you many examples.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Morning sir,
i will search google but from your side please share some good resource and links to have good knowledge for license management.
i am not sure my intention is clear or not. i will install a winform apps in client pc. client pc may have no internet connection. so how could i expiry the apps depend on expiry date because client may change his pc system date every day before running my winform apps. so please share some logic to develop apps which will not depend on client pc system's date and time.
thanks & have good weekend.
|
|
|
|
|
Mou_kol wrote: looking for good discussion. thanks
You're not the first one to ask; so I'd assume you looked for it by Googeling.
To repeat the answer; there are larger companies that spend a lot of money on copy-protections and they have given up on winning that war. I need not muck with the systems' time, just to install your software in a VM, and disallow writing.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
You can't.
Unless there is a connection to an external, trusted, reliable time source - and without an internet connection there isn't - the only time and /or date source you have is the system clock. And that is so easily spoofed or played with that you are wasting your time trying work round that.
What I would suggest is: trust your users. Think about how much of your time you will invest on coding unbreakable security, how much your time is worth, and how many users you will manage to convert to paying customers as a result. Do not forget to figure in all the customers you annoy by having an overly-rigid security system that penalizes legitimate users and the number of sales you will lose as a result of that. Then look at the cost of your software. If it's cheap, you are probably wasting your time. If it's seriously expensive, then you are probably wasting your time - as that attracts hacked versions; Adobe Photoshop has had man-years spent on security in the past, only for a cracked version to be released the same day as the official product!
Remember that it's easy to lose a good reputation, and very hard to get it back - and penalizing a single legitimate user by mistake can really harm your standing.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
"Turning back" the system clock doesn't work too well if the app itself depends on a "current" clock in order to function properly.
One has to be pretty desperate to live with "bad" output dates in a "crack".
If "device clocks" aren't synched, you can create wonderful messes.
"(I) am amazed to see myself here rather than there ... now rather than then".
― Blaise Pascal
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
