|
manoharbalu wrote:
Is there a way to write to a file which cannot be viewed directly by the user from disk whereas it could be read by the program.
Encrypt it?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
Don't save it on the user's system.
|
|
|
|
|
manoharbalu wrote: Is there a way to write to a file which cannot be viewed directly by the user
no.
|
|
|
|
|
Do what Richard says encrypt it when your write and decrypt when you read it.
You can go from simple XOR encryption if it isn't that important to the real heavy stuff and there is a pile of libraries and code out there.
In vino veritas
|
|
|
|
|
I am using huge structure template and size is around 100kb with various member variables like char array, int, long and short. I am writing this entire structure using fwrite. But when I retreive the structure data from file using fread, some of the structure members especially long variable shows incorrect value.
Kindly suggest me if writing a full structure is wrong or how to work around.
|
|
|
|
|
Without seeing your code it is impossible to guess what you are doing wrong. How are you writing it, with a single fwrite call, or separate calls for each structure item?
|
|
|
|
|
manoharbalu wrote: Kindly suggest me if writing a full structure is wrong
As described probably it is incorrect. Even the design is suspect. Such a large collection must be divisible and as such it should be programmed that way. Note of course that this doesn't mean it cannot be handled as a serialized data stream. That is in fact what all files on disk are exactly.
Other than that it is likely that you have a bug in your code that reads or writes the data. Probably you have a size wrong. If the process was broken into smaller pieces (as I said above) then you could individually test each of those and thus insure that the entire thing was valid.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you made sure you open the file for write in binary mode.
FILE * binfile = fopen("somefilename.bin", "wb"); //Open writable bin file
You open it with just "w" command and it's in text mode some of the raw struct characters will be translated to tabs, CR, LF etc.
In vino veritas
|
|
|
|
|
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
int input();
int main()
{
char name[100];
printf("Enter your name:\n");
strcpy(name,input());
printf("\n%s", name);
return 0;
}
int input()
{
char c[100];
gets(c);
return(c);
}
i am getting this error while running this code.
[Warning] passing argument 2 of 'strcpy' makes pointer from integer without a cast.
I have tried this code. I know I can do it similarly as that of returning an array from a function to main, but that's too long is there any alternative short method.
|
|
|
|
|
input() returns an int. strcpy() is expecting a char pointer.
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
how do we use char *function(), and does it returns character, like int function() returns an integer ?
|
|
|
|
|
Tarun Jha wrote: how do we use char *function(), and does it returns character...
It returns a pointer to a character.
However, C is not a strong-typed language so you can coerce that into many things. Pointers are a prime example of C being known for giving you just enough rope to hang yourself. Just sayin...
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles
|
|
|
|
|
There is no simple method in C to return a string from a function.
Possible methods are:
1. Passing a char* pointer to the function and the function fills the passed buffer. In such cases the size of the buffer should be also passed and the return value indicates failure (usually -1) or success (usually length of copied string):
int input(char *buf, int buf_size)
{
char local_buf[100] = "";
fgets(local_buf, sizeof(local_buf), stdin);
int len = strlen(local_buf);
if (buf_size <= len)
return -1;
strcpy(buf, local_buf);
return len;
}
2. Letting the function allocate a buffer. The calling function must free the buffer when no longer used:
char *input()
{
char local_buf[100] = "";
fgets(local_buf, sizeof(local_buf), stdin);
return strdup(local_buf);
}
char *input_str;
input_str = input();
free(input_str);
However, in your case there is no need for an own function because it is already provided by the standard C library: fgets - C++ Reference[^].
|
|
|
|
|
You can't do this. Because array c is released when input() function execute completed. Maybe you can used "static" key word to prevent array c to released or pass a buffer to input() function as parameter.
|
|
|
|
|
As per your last post lets fix my code from it into a function .. which is what I assume you are trying to do
int StringInput (char* name, int namemax)
{
int c;
int namelen = 0; if (name && namemax > 1) { do {
c = getc(stdin); name[namelen++] = (char) c; } while (c !=EOF && c != '\n' && namelen < namemax-1); temp.name[namelen-1] = '\0'; }
return(namelen); }
/
int main(void)
{
char name[100];
int len = StringInput(&name[0], sizeof(name));
StringInput(&name[0], sizeof(name));
}
Now if this is for uni or commercial then you probably want this form ... An excercise for you is to understand why and how to do it
int StringInput (const char* name, const int namemax, const FILE* source)
In vino veritas
modified 3-Jan-18 21:27pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: if (name && namemax > 1)
.
why name is there when it is a char, and how can it be > 1?? And it works fine if i remove it.
|
|
|
|
|
Tarun Jha wrote: Quote: if (name && namemax > 1)
.
why name is there when it is a char, and how can it be > 1?? And it works fine if i remove it.
You could rewrite it to be:
if (name != NULL && namemax > 1))
that means that name points to some space in memory and the length of this "space" (character array) is > 1.
And "it works fine if i remove it" only means that name != NULL and namemax > 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tarun Jha wrote: And it works fine if i remove it.
It does not work fine if you remove it because you now have a rather hidden bug in your code. Get hold of a good book on C (as I have repeatedly suggested) and issues like this will become clear.
|
|
|
|
|
i bought k&r but it's a bit difficult for me to understand.
|
|
|
|
|
K&R is probably the easiest introduction to C. If you find it hard then you need to read it through quite a few times.
|
|
|
|
|
i will do it as many times as needed until i get the concepts.
|
|
|
|
|
Again Richard MacCutchan is correct so let me explain my code
name is a "pointer to a char" NOT a char
So this line
if (name && namemax > 1)
Is a shortcut of writing
if ( (name != 0) && (namemax > 1) )
writing
if (anything)
Basically checks if the thing called "anything" is not zero its a shortcut
So what the line it is checking is the pointer called name is not 0 (or null which is an invalid pointer)
the space for the buffer name is greater than 1 .. why well the code specifically
makes an '\0' terminated C string so it needs a minimum buffer size of 1 to hold the '\0'
So name == 0 or namemax == 0 would bug the code so they are specifically handled.
So the line is a specific safety to make sure you could NEVER bug the routine doing
either the function will simply return 0 which is correct it read no character data.
There are a couple of other possible background bugs and program hints which was in
my hint to change the interface.
1.) The use of "stdin" could be possibly problematic in some esoteric systems .. you
don't know it's actually a device there might be no keyboard etc on the system. As such
bringing it in thru the interface pass that responsibility out to the caller code.
2.) We don't ever change name or namemax internally so placing a const in front of them
makes it clear that is the case and also allows the optimizer to really go to work. So
it's not a bug fix but a help to the compiler and anyone using the code.
So that is as robust to function input error as I can make your function.
You are left with two possible errors outside my control passing in a pointer to some
wrong place and passing in a wrong maximum buffer size. I would have to be a mind reader
to be able to deal with those but I have dealt with all the obvious possible errors.
In vino veritas
modified 4-Jan-18 21:08pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your elaborated explanation i was able to understand and learn many new things.
|
|
|
|
|
I have been practicing structures and function and while making a program that does not accept '\n' and EOF as input. Below is the program, it takes input but the compiler does not shows any error.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
typedef struct
{
char name[100];
int goals;
}match;
match check();
int main()
{
int log;
match team;
scanf("%d", &log);
printf("Enter goals:\n");
scanf("%d", team.goals);
fflush(stdin);
team = check();
printf("Name: %s\t\tGoals: %d\n", team.name, team.goals);
return 0;
}
match check()
{
int c;
match temp;
gets(temp.name);
if((c=temp.name[0])==EOF && c == '\n')
{
printf("Invalid entry!");
check(temp);
}
return(temp);
}
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
