|
When posting an article you can add whatever tags you wish.
The sections are for the general topic of your article, and the tags for the specific language, platform and technology used.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
... To always serve the desktop site, instead of the mobile?
It's a pain on my tablet to keep having to tell Chrome to "request desktop site"...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
What device are you using?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Nexus 7
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry for the delay, landline failed and broadband went with it...
Browser Check
User agent string:
Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4; Nexus 7 Build/KRT16S) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/51.0.2704.81 Safari/537.36
Lookup
User Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4; Nexus 7 Build/KRT16S) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/51.0.2704.81 Safari/537.36
Browser Chrome
Device Type Mobile Phone
Version string 0.0
Version 0
Platform Android
Platform Version 4.4
Chrome True
Edge False
IE False
Opera False
Safari False
Blink False
EdgeHTML False
Gecko False
Trident False
WebKit True
Desktop False
Tablet False
Mobile Device True
Small Mobile Device True
Touch Device False
Standard True
Display Mode Mobile
Editable Elements True
Modern True
Semi-Modern True
CRC 727082069
Cookies OK? True
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
This is where I just want to go back to MFC applications.
The Nexus is a phone. Except it's as big as a tablet. We modify what we send to phones in order to cater to slower processors, less RAM, less bandwidth, and because we simply won't be showing as much. Your device is a phone - and our system will treat it as such - but it's really a tablet when it comes to display.
I'm loathe to remove our "mobile rendering" mode because there's still lots of folks who appreciate being sent less HTML. I'm scared to add display-mode persistence because it'll mean lots of people stuck on "mobile view" (or whatever) and getting a crappy experience. Regardless, I'll add this as a TODO and cross my fingers. It could take a while to get this done unfortunately (pipeline kinda full this month)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I know what you mean, but how about three options:
1) Depends on device (default)
2) Always desktop
3) Always mobile
That way, nobody's experience is degraded unless they specifically say "I want this" - and only people who have a problem will bother to change it.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
How about making it a user setting? If the user's logged in, respect his previous setting on that device.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. (See the "I'm scared to add display-mode persistence because it'll mean lots of people stuck on "mobile view" (or whatever) and getting a crappy experience. Regardless, I'll add this as a TODO and cross my fingers." bit in my previous post)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
A good idea, solution may be to just remove the CSS3 media query. 
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
I generally only bother to look at forums that are marked as having new content. Now, frequently (nowadays anyway), opening one of these shows there's really no new content in there because the content is caught in the moderation process. Would it be possible for you to not mark these forums as having content, if all that's new is held in the moderation queue?
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slightly different. I'm talking about not showing the forum as having updates if there isn't anything visible because it's in the spam moderation queue (or has been deleted as spam).
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
|
No problem. I obviously wasn't clear enough, so this gave me a chance to make my point clearer.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
That's do-able. I've added it to the TODO.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
This question: Ajaxtoolkit: validatorcalloute... Not working[^] was originally in teh QA list but with no subject, so it wasn;t clickable to follow it.
A quick Chrome "Inspect" later and it's because it started with "<" with no matching close tag and so was HTML swallowed.
I'm pretty sure that subject lines should never contain raw HTML, so perhaps a quick extra validation?
On a related subject, when I went to edit it I just removed the offending character and couldn't post as it didn't contain three words, just "<Ajaxtoolkit:validatorcalloute..." so it should have failed the original validation anyway. Odd.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder why you didn't answered it, while you were there...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Because it's a huge, ugly code dump and I can't be bothered to wade my way through it in search of an actual question before my second cup of ![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif) ?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Items that need attention:
The name you supplied has already been registered. If you already have a CodeProject account using this name then please sign in (or you can retrieve your password).
Every time I try to update my profile I get the above message. I am already signed in at this point.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Any ad blockers? Net-nannies? Cookie blockers? Overactive firewalls?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. I have AdBlock but it is disabled for the CodeProject domain.
You fixed a problem for me a few years back when I somehow ended up with two accounts that you merged for me - everything appeared fine since then but this is the first time I wanted to update my profile.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
I am (incorrectly) shown as editor to the question How to solve this codility problem[^] but it seems Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov is the actual editor.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen that behaviour if I've allowed a post through the spam moderation list
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
