Bugs and Suggestions

   

FirstPrevNext

Re: Could we have a user based option... Nish Nishant17-Jun-16 11:23 Nish Nishant 17-Jun-16 11:23  How about making it a user setting? If the user's logged in, respect his previous setting on that device. Regards, Nish Website: www.voidnish.com Blog: voidnish.wordpress.com Re: Could we have a user based option... Chris Maunder19-Jun-16 5:03 Chris Maunder 19-Jun-16 5:03  Yep. (See the "I'm scared to add display-mode persistence because it'll mean lots of people stuck on "mobile view" (or whatever) and getting a crappy experience. Regardless, I'll add this as a TODO and cross my fingers." bit in my previous post) cheers Chris Maunder Re: Could we have a user based option... Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan16-Jun-16 8:46 Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan 16-Jun-16 8:46  A good idea, solution may be to just remove the CSS3 media query. The sh*t I complain about It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem ~! Firewall !~ Marking forums as updated with spam Pete O'Hanlon13-Jun-16 23:00 Pete O'Hanlon 13-Jun-16 23:00  I generally only bother to look at forums that are marked as having new content. Now, frequently (nowadays anyway), opening one of these shows there's really no new content in there because the content is caught in the moderation process. Would it be possible for you to not mark these forums as having content, if all that's new is held in the moderation queue? This space for rent Re: Marking forums as updated with spam Richard MacCutchan14-Jun-16 4:00 Richard MacCutchan 14-Jun-16 4:00  See Richard Deeming's answer below to Quickly-locating-new-forum-messages[^]. Re: Marking forums as updated with spam Pete O'Hanlon14-Jun-16 4:10 Pete O'Hanlon 14-Jun-16 4:10  Slightly different. I'm talking about not showing the forum as having updates if there isn't anything visible because it's in the spam moderation queue (or has been deleted as spam). This space for rent Re: Marking forums as updated with spam Richard MacCutchan14-Jun-16 4:41 Richard MacCutchan 14-Jun-16 4:41  My mistake. Re: Marking forums as updated with spam Pete O'Hanlon14-Jun-16 6:21 Pete O'Hanlon 14-Jun-16 6:21  No problem. I obviously wasn't clear enough, so this gave me a chance to make my point clearer. This space for rent Re: Marking forums as updated with spam Chris Maunder15-Jun-16 16:00 Chris Maunder 15-Jun-16 16:00  That's do-able. I've added it to the TODO. cheers Chris Maunder Invisible QA question OriginalGriff13-Jun-16 20:00 OriginalGriff 13-Jun-16 20:00  This question: Ajaxtoolkit: validatorcalloute... Not working[^] was originally in teh QA list but with no subject, so it wasn;t clickable to follow it. A quick Chrome "Inspect" later and it's because it started with "<" with no matching close tag and so was HTML swallowed. I'm pretty sure that subject lines should never contain raw HTML, so perhaps a quick extra validation? On a related subject, when I went to edit it I just removed the offending character and couldn't post as it didn't contain three words, just "<Ajaxtoolkit:validatorcalloute..." so it should have failed the original validation anyway. Odd. Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... Re: Invisible QA question Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter13-Jun-16 21:56 Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter 13-Jun-16 21:56  I wonder why you didn't answered it, while you were there... Skipper: We'll fix it. Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this? Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape. Re: Invisible QA question OriginalGriff13-Jun-16 22:09 OriginalGriff 13-Jun-16 22:09  Because it's a huge, ugly code dump and I can't be bothered to wade my way through it in search of an actual question before my second cup of ? Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay... To be or not to be (logged in) - yes I am logged in!   Forogar  13-Jun-16 6:13   Forogar   13-Jun-16 6:13  Quote: Items that need attention: The name you supplied has already been registered. If you already have a CodeProject account using this name then please sign in (or you can retrieve your password). Every time I try to update my profile I get the above message. I am already signed in at this point. - I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code. Re: To be or not to be (logged in) - yes I am logged in! Chris Maunder21-Jun-16 6:27 Chris Maunder 21-Jun-16 6:27  Any ad blockers? Net-nannies? Cookie blockers? Overactive firewalls? cheers Chris Maunder Re: To be or not to be (logged in) - yes I am logged in!   Forogar  22-Jun-16 3:36   Forogar   22-Jun-16 3:36  Nope. I have AdBlock but it is disabled for the CodeProject domain. You fixed a problem for me a few years back when I somehow ended up with two accounts that you merged for me - everything appeared fine since then but this is the first time I wanted to update my profile. - I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code. Why am I shown as the editor to question in Q&A User 5924112-Jun-16 21:43 User 59241 12-Jun-16 21:43  I am (incorrectly) shown as editor to the question How to solve this codility problem[^] but it seems Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov is the actual editor. Peter Wasser "The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell Re: Why am I shown as the editor to question in Q&A CHill6012-Jun-16 22:23 CHill60 12-Jun-16 22:23  I've seen that behaviour if I've allowed a post through the spam moderation list can not download source code AlexWang201812-Jun-16 0:01 AlexWang2018 12-Jun-16 0:01  I can not download the source code from this link http://www.codeproject.com/KB/dotnet/674256/ByteArrayBuilder.zip Can you help to check? Re: can not download source code Jochen Arndt12-Jun-16 0:32 Jochen Arndt 12-Jun-16 0:32  It is working for me. Please try again. Alternatively choose 'Browse Code' on the left (or open Downloads: ByteArrayBuilder - a StringBuilder for Bytes - CodeProject[^]), click right on the ZIP file, and choose 'Save as'. Re: can not download source code AlexWang201812-Jun-16 15:50 AlexWang2018 12-Jun-16 15:50  Thank u very much. I am see the content from your link. QA has time-travelled CHill6010-Jun-16 11:21 CHill60 10-Jun-16 11:21  A lot (really ... a lot) of really old (waay back to 2010) questions appearing at top of active list in QA. No apparent reason - as in no new answers, no "Updated x hours ago" modified 11-Jun-16 7:17am. Re: QA has time-travelled Patrice T10-Jun-16 11:27 Patrice T 10-Jun-16 11:27  I confirm. QA top of list literally flooded with unmodified old QA. Making the date of posting more visible would be a nice thing. Patrice “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein Re: QA has time-travelled Sean Ewington13-Jun-16 2:56 Sean Ewington 13-Jun-16 2:56  It was me. Again. I was very deletey on Friday. Thanks, Sean Ewington CodeProject Re: QA has time-travelled CHill6013-Jun-16 3:04 CHill60 13-Jun-16 3:04  Didn't see you as a Punk TBH - https://www.youtube.com/user/deletey[^] Re: QA has time-travelled Sean Ewington13-Jun-16 3:31 Sean Ewington 13-Jun-16 3:31  Maybe this will be my new deleting song. It's not bad. Thanks, Sean Ewington CodeProject

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 24-Apr-24 23:08 Refresh ᐊ Prev1...488489490491492493494495496497 Next ᐅ

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.