|
I can't see the problem...
ppolymorphe.png (24.2 KB)
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I see this
cp_bug1.PNG[^]
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
I checked your answer  ...
I see the same on the question...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Sir,
I have been utilizing the facilities of this site for about six months. I have got answers to all of my questions from this site Thank you sir. Now I could see a separate field for asking questions named "what you have tried?" In this field I could not add code tags like this
<pre lang="Python">
when I select the specific code tag e.g C . It only gets added in the field "Describe your problem" but never in the "what you have tried?" field. But even when I select my code and hit the code tags it doesn't work.
But I could manually type code tag and make it work but I feel it would be better if the code tag works.
![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif) Thank you sir for your time
|
|
|
|
|
This is on the "Open Items" list on the right side of the page - which means it's in the queue to be added in the near future: Bugs and Suggestions - CodeProject[^]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry sir I didn't notice it. Thank you for your kind help 
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
You forgot to point out that everyone who cares about this needs to "up vote" that Bugs and Suggestions - CodeProject[^] posting in order to move it up in the queue of things to be done! 
The issue "ahead" of it has been in the queue for nearly 3 years!
And the first item in Open Items is about a year and a half.
That does not make a solution to this appear likely to be anytime soon.... 
(If only I could up vote it a dozen or so more times!)
"Fairy tales do not tell children the dragons exist. Children already know that dragons exist. Fairy tales tell children the dragons can be killed."
- G.K. Chesterton
|
|
|
|
|
(AFAIK) The current system for article moderation lets an article through with 10 approvals but to stop it it takes 10 reports of the same kind. So 9 reports for spam/abuse plus 9 reports for <something else> won't suffice to stop it.
I think this should be changed so that 10 reports of any kind will stop an article from being published, or maybe some middle ground, but not 10 reports of the same kind. The following two factors lead to garbage submissions being approved so that they have to be re-reported both as posts in the S&A forum and as report-clicks on the submission in the queue: 1) There are evidently several members approving any garbage without giving it a thought, and 2) often it isn't obvious for which reason a submission should be reported so that reports don't "line up" even if originating from a post in the S&A forum. I thought about suggesting that article reports should include the suggested report option but, realistically, I don't think that would work consistently.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
modified 6-May-16 20:43pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Sascha Lefèvre wrote: 1) There are evidently several members approving any garbage without giving it a thought, and
That's exactly why I suggested a couple of times to make partially visible to some selected people, who is approving an article. Maybe that way we can reduce the amount of blind approves.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I have noticed quite a few times over the last few days that I will attempt to post a response to a post and CP will tell me that it has already posted. It hasn't. This is in the Soapbox where I thought it wasn't moderated. Sometimes they show up later, other times not at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's weird, the rest of the URL was correct, the article ID was wrong. All fixed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, but as the rest is only relevant for SEO, the id is all that matters
I don't know how that happened, but thanks for fixing it! 
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to see a dedicated place where members can exchange experiences with malware, especially new variants that are not yet detected by some anti-virus products.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Nish!
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Are we ever going to get the ability to post pictures? By "we", I mean users with sufficiently high enough reputation (and membership tenure?).
Suggestion - how about a new user icon that indicates people that have been members for over 10 years...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
You mean an old fart's icon? Or do you mean an icon that represents the wisdom, self-restraint and all round nurturing grandfatherly ways our elder members exhibit?
Pictures in forums: They will come.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: an icon that represents the wisdom, self-restraint and all round nurturing grandfatherly ways our elder members exhibit?
Can you get the "psycho" look into 16x16 pixels? With the blood-dripping axe?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Can you get the "psycho" look into 16x16 pixels?
That's what JSOP's avatar already is? Seriously, what is that hideous thing? 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
That's the turkeymonkey from a 1995 computer game featuring the band Devo, called "The Adventures of The Smart Patrol".
I scanned the image from Wired Magazine over 20 years ago.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. After all these years that mystery is solved.
I think I need to go sit down somewhere quiet.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
You should print this thread on paper, and store it in a secure, cool, and dry place for reference later when the topic comes up again. Because it WILL come up again.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
