|
Yesterday, I stopped getting emails for replies - but still did for newsletters and suchlike - and assumed it was a minor hiccup.
But still none today, so I checked my settings and the "Send me an e-mail if someone replies to the message" had become unchecked. I haven't visited "My Settings" in months! 
I've re-enabled it, and we'll see if that fixes it - it may be a "soft error" or similar but if you get many people with the same it may be worth a look.
[edit]Yes - that fixed it[/edit]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
modified 29-Jan-16 5:29am.
|
|
|
|
|
I confirm I had to re-enable this feature too, without having modified it myself in the first place.
I never finish anyth
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it fixed the problem - I got an email for that one.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
We had an issue probably over a year ago where user settings (such as "email me notifications" were getting corrupted occasionally but it's been a long time since we've seen that. Thanks for letting us know - we'll keep an eye on it.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
At present, questions can be asked without any content. For instance I created a question (and deleted it). With nothing but < b > tags in body. Would it be better if validation would fail in this case?
"You'd have to be a floating database guru clad in a white toga and ghandi level of sereneness to fix this goddamn clusterfuck.", BruceN[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
d@nish wrote: With nothing but < b > tags in body.
So you did provide a question body - just not a useful one! 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
That's why we allow people to close questions.
But yes: more automated checks are needed. It's just not always easy to provide a once-size-fits-all.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
In the page How do I solve this codility problem!!![^], I wrote a comment to solution 3, then I decided to add some extra information.
Multiple editor were opened at different place in comments above (like 4 editors) all with my current comment and I modify one of those without really paying attention to that and then my comment was a few comment above under another user name and my original comment was unchanged.
For sure, I tried to edit my comment as the code in the editor was exactly my comment. I click on the link to modify my comment again and there I can confirm that multiple editor were opened.
So for sure, something went wrong with comments on code project. I don't know if there is a log in Code project on edition that were done as it might maybe help confirm the strange behavior.
Philippe Mori
|
|
|
|
|
This actually sounds like a Javascript issue, given that the comment editor is instantiated via Javascript (not server side) calls.
Which browser/version? Do you have ad blockers or other add-ins enabled?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Probably Safari on iPad. It seems to be specific for some comments. Maybe because some comment in that solution were deleted.
The same issue occurs also with Edge browser. If a edit comment, in that solution, a bunch of editors are opened.
Same thing with Internet Explorer 11. Same thing with Google Chrome 48.
The problem really seems to be specific to some cases. In fact, it seems that the problem only occurs if I try to edit either a deleted comment or a comment after the deleted comment whatever the level.
If we don't pay attention because other editor are below in the page, we can easily overwrite the wrong comment even from someone else...
I just tried it again with 4 different browser and get the problem in each one. Try to edit any comment in Solution 3 from the first deleted comment and you should see the editor opened once for every comment starting at the deleted one until the last comment in that answer.
I tried to find other questions with deleted comments (except last one on an answer) but it does not happen very often so at this point I was only able to reproduce the problem in that answer.
Philippe Mori
|
|
|
|
|
Audio Player[^]
No reason to close it. If you close this you have to close any article related on this and that Driver.... e.g a MP3 Encoder, for which usually no source is available.
Only my mind.
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
IF you see an article that has a DLL and no source then report it and we'll review it.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, I will inform you, but I will never "report" them.
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Create a new QA Answer.
Enter code:
string source = @"D:\New";
string other = @"D:\New\XY\y";
string diff = other.Replace(source, "").TrimStart('\\');
And enclose it in a code block.
It displays as:
string source = @"D:\New";
string other = @"D:\New\XY\y";
string diff = other.Replace(source, "").TrimStart('\');One of the back slashes has disapeared in the trim character.
If you edit it, add a space between them:
string source = @"D:\New";
string other = @"D:\New\XY\y";
string diff = other.Replace(source, "").TrimStart('\ \');
Then edit it again, and remove the space:
string source = @"D:\New";
string other = @"D:\New\XY\y";
string diff = other.Replace(source, "").TrimStart('\\');
It works fine...
At all stages, the preview shows you exactly what you have typed, but the actual posted answer may be different.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Another one.
When using the hash character as first one after a pre tag, there must be a space or line feed inserted. Otherwise it will miss the hash in the final post but not in the preview.
This will show up without the hash character in QA (here in the forum it is OK):
<pre>#define SOME_DEF 0</pre>
define SOME_DEF 0
This will be OK.
<pre>
#define SOME_DEF 0</pre>
#define SOME_DEF 0
|
|
|
|
|
When you respond to messages in forums you can uncheck the "Use Markdown formatting" checkbox at the bottom.
I don't know if it's global and affects also Q&A (where I haven't seen any such checkbox), but it's worth trying.
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't affect QA. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing affects QA. It has grown beyond our comprehension.
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
If a coffee bean is between the Earth and the Sun, is it a Java Eclipse? -- Sascha Lefèvre
/xml>
|
|
|
|
|
I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Markdown is schizophrenic. And bipolar.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
This isn't a markdown issue. It looks like it's a processing issue our end.
Added to the TODO
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I was just reading over my article in an attempt to clean it up some and I noticed that an image was missing.
ASP.NET MVC : Build Your Custom Blog Engine (CMS) - Part 1 of 2(Own ASP.NET MVC)[^]
Bad Root Path
I did an inspect (in Chrome) and checked the image name which is UnRio17.png.
Chrome offers the absolute path to that same image as:
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1072781/unrio17.png -- if you navigate to that path, you see a CP error.
Finding a Good RootPath
I examined another image in my article and saw the rootpath is probably supposed to be:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/1072781/
I took that rootpath and pasted on the name of my image that wasn't displaying and voila the image loaded:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/1072781/UnRio17.png[^]
I also tried a refresh on the page to see if somehow those rootpaths are generated and would generate properly, but the image never shows.
I hope this helps make resolving the issue a bit more easy.
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
As mentioned by @Nelek , It makes sense if the protectors can get a visibility of members who have approved some dubious articles.
@chris-maunder mentioned that little education should solve the problem. In such case if the protectors know who has been careless with the approval system, they can explain them the process
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
The members who approved an article are already shown at the bottom left.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
To moderators or to all gold members?
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
