|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer's gone; article is still alive on 12.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jochen Arndt wrote: But I'm not sure about reporting the user.
The rule is that plagiarism is a capital offence: you steal someone's hard work, post it as your own, and your account goes - and will not be reinstated.
Always report the article, always report the user.
In this case, he's clearly been naughty before as the article has two kicks, and the user has been closed!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
May be I'm too clement sometimes.
And other's do not check (and even did not read my post about plagiarism on the peding article forum):
The pending article has been accepted meanwhile.
But it should be gone soon.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, the Hamsters used to be as well. But when someone pleaded for their account to be reopened, and promised faithfully that they wouldn't do it again, most of 'em apparently turned round and did it again, just a bit more carefully. So the Powers That Be decided "zero tolerance" is the only approach that provides any significant deterrent.
And I have to agree: if you any I can sweat for a week to get the text right, why should some scrote give a misleading impression on his resume that he knows his stuff and writes good quality documents?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Yeah, the Hamsters used to be as well....
... So the Powers That Be decided "zero tolerance" is the only approach that provides any significant deterrent.
I didn't know that, but not a big difference for me. I think: We nuke, and CP decides if reinstate or not.
Pity is that some of the banned come back under another user name (or even similar one) and try it again  
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Jochen wrote: The pending article has been accepted meanwhile.
Ah - that explains my confusion - when I followed the links I got the accepted article both times ... I wasn't quite awake at the time 
Reported it anyway
|
|
|
|
|
It seems it was not the first one. I now wanted to report him, but my name was already on the list, so he has been already here before.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
