|
How about a vision system watching the board combines with a projector and use this for intellisense?
Screw it just put up a huge touchsurface instead of whiteboards. XD
|
|
|
|
|
#SupportHeForShe If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
Only 2 things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
The next time someone sends you a link to picture, be it that of a funny cat or a beautiful sunset, be careful before you click on it—it might hack your computer. That's it - I'm going back to browsing with Mosaic
|
|
|
|
|
You got all wrong...
This is not an exploit, but a poor way of obfuscating your JavaScript code...
If you read the original material (http://conference.hitb.org/hitbsecconf2015ams/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/D1T1-Saumil-Shah-Stegosploit-Hacking-with-Pictures.pdf), you will understand that the problem is not by looking at the image, but that the very same image used as the source of a script tag!!!
So actually "I don’t need to host a blog, I don’t need to host a website at all. I don’t even need to register a domain" is a false statement (and I'm tempted to say that is for creating fear just for self promotion) as you DO need a full html page with a script and an image tag that point to the very same image...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
A couple of weeks after rumors first hit the Internet that Microsoft might be in talks to acquire the popular "to-do" app Wunderlist, a new report claims that the acquisition is a done deal. Scratch that off their to-do list
|
|
|
|
|
That episode of The Simpsons where Bill Gates buys out Homer's internet company because he can't figure out what it actually does but can't afford to compete with it... not satire then?
|
|
|
|
|
Hack allows firmware to be rewritten right after older Macs awake from sleep. "Macs don't get viruses"
|
|
|
|
|
Not really a mac just a bios attack. Everything that is made can be unmade
.'\ /`.
.'.-.`-'.-.`.
..._: .-. .-. :_...
.' '-.(o ) (o ).-' `.
: _ _ _`~(_)~`_ _ _ :
: /: ' .-=_ _=-. ` ;\ :
: :|-.._ ' ` _..-|: :
: `:| |`:-:-.-:-:'| |:' :
`. `.| | | | | | |.' .'
`. `-:_| | |_:-' .'
`-._ ```` _.-'
``-------'/xml>
|
|
|
|
|
Not really a BIOS attack, just an EFI attack 
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft has included a new feature in the latest build of Windows 10 and while it may not seem like a big deal right now, it paves the way for an improved user experience going forward. That feature is the ability to open multiple instances of a Modern app. Great. Multiple copies of apps I'm not interested in running. Progress!
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: That feature is the ability to open multiple instances of a Modern app.
In other words, multiple instances of Office apps, because most "Modern" apps don't stop you from opening up multiple instances except Office apps, where the new document is added to the existing app, making it impossible to view documents side by side.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
It's interesting you mention Office. I'm running Office 2010 and it does my head in that I can't run multiple instances of Excel. Open 2 spreadsheets and they will always appear in the same MDI window. Completely useless on a multi-monitor setup.
Maybe Win10 will be good after all
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Open 2 spreadsheets and they will always appear in the same MDI window. Completely useless on a multi-monitor setup.
Exactly the use case I was thinking of!
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Try This Registry File[^]
I just created it based on some info I found (basically I disabled Excel's DDE usage, which is what caused the multiple documents in one instance issue)
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Granted I currently use Office 2013, but I don't remember ever having issues with two Excel documents being viewed on two monitors ... or side by side on single for that matters 
modified 19-Nov-18 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You can run multiple instances of Excel 2010 by shift-clicking on the Window's taskbar icon, and opening different documents in each of them (via drag and drop if you wish) but Excel barfs when copying data from one instance to another. 
|
|
|
|
|
Run Excel.exe and then open another file.
Or on Windows 7, open the first file, then middle-click on Excel in the taskbar to open a second instance of it.
|
|
|
|
|
Ahem.
Options | Advanced | Display | Show all windows in the taskbar
|
|
|
|
|
Yep -that shows all child windows in the task bar, but doesn't let you actually treat child windows as separate windows.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Using this, I was able to move a different spreadsheet onto each different monitor.
|
|
|
|
|
Office 2010 or 2013?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Office 2010. I believe it was removed in 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
In that case it's being actively malicious in refusing to work properly. Curse your Office! Curse you!
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Excel 2013 does remove the all spreadsheets in a single MDI container misfeature of the last 20 years of excel so you can view them side by side without needing to run multiple excel processes.
But it does something even worse instead. To be helpful it actively merges multiple Excel processes together. Officially this is supposed to be a good idea because copy/paste between two SSes in different processes doesn't quite work the same as copy/paste between to SSes in the same process, also "to make it work more like MS Word" (WTE that actually means). This is a problem because Excel still only has a single undo buffer shared among all documents and my second most common reason for multiple Excel processes is to get around that. Typical workflow:
0) Start making major changes to a table of data, and realize I need the before and after versions side by side.
1) Copy the updated table into a spreadsheet in a new process.
2) Go to the original file and Undo. Undo. Undo. Undo...
3) Copy the new table back to the original file.
2013 breaks this because it immediately merges processes and my first undo removes the copy in the temp file. I initially tried working around it by saving the temp file, only to discover that my undo buffer was completely emptied. 
Fortunately a bit of Googling turned up the solution. Replace the "magic" shortcut created by the office installer with a normal one and add the /x command line parameter. Now all of my Excel processes stay non-merged just like they're supposed to.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Sadly not, unless you want to run one "Desktop" version and one "Modern" (i.e. Metro) version, from my reading. I believe MS sometimes use "Modern App" to describe a Store App/Universal App, whatever the **** you want to call that pile of steaming...
As I keep reiterating, if this is their idea of the future of Windows development, it may well be time to start reskilling on a different platform. I love the idea of Universal Apps, where most code can be shared between desktop/tablet/phone/HoloLens, but I don't like the restrictions that come with the only way of distributing an app to users (apart from in source form), except within an Enterprise.
That's (barely) acceptable for a phone or tablet, for a desktop O/S its just not acceptable.
If it was possible to set up a number of trusted stores/repositories, I'd have no issues at all.
(It's not even like its worked very well at keeping their own store free of cruft)
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
