|
How is it possible to update the "download source" in an article / tip?
|
|
|
|
|
I have an article relating to Sitecore that is on a web site that is about to be removed. The article was written 2 years ago and is a little dated. However, the site it is on gets about 2000 hits a month and the article seems to still to be useful.
Whilst I do not have the time to update this article for 2015, it would be a simple task to publish to Code Project 'as is' with a short introduction explaining that it is two years old. Would it be acceptable for an old article being re-published in this way?
J
|
|
|
|
|
John Newcombe wrote: the article seems to still to be useful
Then why don't you just add a section for the upgrade? Like: "Welcome to the present" or something like that where you post the new content, but leave the old there as well.
Sometimes an old long well explained article is better and teaches more than a new more efficient but short content.
Just my 5 cent
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to add a message that stays at the top of the article comments.
Is this possible?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm. I think so. Which message would you like to be sticky?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apparently it has to be a new post. Would you be willing to repost that, so I can make the new post sticky?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Actually I am thinking it through now, it cannot be done  Unless you want me to post a comment on your article forum for you (but it would under my name).
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mind if it is posted by you.
|
|
|
|
|
Done! I changed the phrasing slightly to make sense since I was posting it.
That people are still coming to the code after 8 years is amazing. Thanks again for sharing it with the community!
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
No problem. My only issue is that they keep asking the same question. "How do you block key presses".
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
I have updated my article with missing screenshots five days back. Unfortunately it is not being approved. Current version is looking very weird. Article link is given below. Please help anybody. Thanks in advance
Building CAML for querying List in SharePoint [^]
modified 25-May-15 12:37pm.
|
|
|
|
|
It needs 5 approvals. It will automatically get published once it receives sufficient votes.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
How can I add zip solution file to my article? I am writing an article and unable to add the zip solution file.
Thanks
modified 23-May-15 14:20pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Here is our FAQ entry on how to do so. Please let me know if you have further questions
Code Project Article FAQ[^]
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
This member[^] has an 'article' and a tip...not only those are almost identical, but also the article is definitely not an article...
He got some opinion on this but still the article got approved as article and the tip as tip...
I think that the best solution is to merge the two into a single tip, or in the less ideal case change the article to tip too...
Tip: Validation in AngularJS[^]
Article: AngularJS Validation[^]
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Post a question we can use markdown formatting, but can i post an article also use markdown formatting?
|
|
|
|
|
Right now it is not possible, but it will be added[^].
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok thanks for the update.
|
|
|
|
|
Now you have an article "AngularJS Validation" and a tip/trick "Validation in AngularJS" published which have basically the same content. Probably as a non-intended result of your numerous attempts to re-publish? Please remove the article.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
One talks about ng-show and another talks about ng-message. They are different ways to display validation logic. Title is for search engine.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, alright then 
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
