|
|
|
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
All on 6 and counting.
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Sup
நெஞ்சு பொறுக்கு திலையே-இந்த
நிலைகெட்ட மனிதரை நினைந்துவிட்டால்
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How did you find them?
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Community > Who's Who > Member ID Desc > repeat until IsBored { Scroll Down > Find Spammers > Click Next }
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Hightech, I see 
thank you
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
It gets boring after a while, but it works. Now if Chris would implement filters for biographies and home pages we'd be all set.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - did you or someone else already suggest that?
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
I did.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like it went unnoticed..? Maybe give him a friendly bump - after all, it can potentially save him work somewhere else 
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
He should be history now!
How do we preserve the wisdom men will need,
when their violent passions are spent?
- The Lost Horizon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following two members look very suspicious to me, but I'm not sure what (if any) actions should be done.
First guy: senthil .Net Developer
Second guy: C#developer.asp
First guy posted two questions [^] on which the second guy provided an answer, additionally the first guy "replied" with an answer instead of the comment and marked both "solutions" as accepted answers.
He does this repeatedly, mark his own "comments" as an accepted answers and so does the second guy, see here.
Also here the first guy provided an answer which is again just a comment to that second guy's question and that "comment" is again accepted.
Maybe I'm a bit paranoid but I believe these two are building their spam accounts for future usage.
|
|
|
|
|
Mario Z wrote: I believe these two are building their spam accounts for future usage.
Don't think it's to do with Spam, it's the same guy trying to game the system by getting easy points for questions he asked as a sock puppet.
C#developer is already one of the top experts in the last 24 hours.
|
|
|
|
|
Yea I caught that too, but I don't see a point in building up reputation points...
What benefit does it have from doing it, am I missing something that reputation points provide?
The only thing that comes to my mind why someone would want to do this is because he thinks that if he's spamming with an account which has a relatively high reputation points that he will not get kicked out.
If I'm correct then I would do is let him build his accounts and kick him on first spam sight, so he wastes all the time and energy building these accounts just to get them kicked at first sight.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
