|
|
Ok thanks for the update.
|
|
|
|
|
Now you have an article "AngularJS Validation" and a tip/trick "Validation in AngularJS" published which have basically the same content. Probably as a non-intended result of your numerous attempts to re-publish? Please remove the article.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
One talks about ng-show and another talks about ng-message. They are different ways to display validation logic. Title is for search engine.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, alright then 
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
The only problem is that the article is NOT an article, but an other tip...
Actually it would be wise to merge both in to one tip - now it is a lot of nothing that repeated...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
After i reposted my blog article to CP and woke up this morning, i got several emails from CP:
- Congratulations!
- Is this Plagiarized?
- The member is being abusive and is now deactivated...
cannot log in any more, so i create a new account to ask a help
modified 19-May-15 7:35am.
|
|
|
|
|
Your previous account and submission both didn't indicate that you were the one who posted the same on coderwall, so it was assumed to be plagiarized from there. If it's okay for you to stick with this new account I think no further action is neccessary.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
yes, that was the problem i didn't recognized. I'll use this new account. Thanks for your help!
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome!
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I did believed it but I want to put it in it's proper place.
modified 18-May-15 10:08am.
|
|
|
|
|
What happened is that the reviewers work to their timescales, not yours. As you aren't paying people to review these submissions for you, you are just going to have to accept that the people who freely volunteer their time just might not have had a chance to get around to it. Patience isn't just a virtue, it's your only option.
|
|
|
|
|
Should be all good now. Apologies for the delay.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks I really appreciate all of your hard work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your articles are in the approval queue.
Each article - even updated ones - must be approved by five members with sufficient privileges if you do not have platinum author reputation.
So just be patient. The articles will be probably approved soon.
|
|
|
|
|
How long should I wait before I ask to review my submission again?
|
|
|
|
|
Moderation is performed by members. So approval depends on how many members have a look at the queue and finally give their OK. Many articles are uploaded during the weekend when only a few members are online. This usually leeds to more articles in the queue on Monday than on other working days.
There is nothing you can do besides being patient.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok so if I don't get an approval would someone let me know why so I can fix the article?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are you including the full article in your feed? I might be looking at the wrong thing, but this looks like just the description. We need the whole kitten kaboodle.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
