|
I made a change to your Newsletter settings that may fix the issue. Could you please let me know if you start getting the Daily.
|
|
|
|
|
Aha! I think I found the issue. I thought I was using my Gmail account directly with Code Project, but I had an older POP3 account in my settings that Gmail checks for me.
I've been testing out Google Inbox instead of using Gmail and Inbox doesn't give you the nice error message that Gmail gives, stating that there was an error connecting to the POP3 account. The fact that I didn't receive email notice of your reply was the clue that it might be an email setting instead of a newsletter setting.
Thanks for your help!
|
|
|
|
|
So it's not us, it's you?
Perfect! 
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at this message: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4975297/Re-Im-looking-for-instructions-to-convert-a-demo-p.aspx[^]
There is a dropbox screenshot here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/s6z6aunwnstkhql/Screenshot%202015-01-07%2016.25.30.png?dl=0[^]
If you look at the MSDN UserControl class link, it breaks after "UserC" and puts "ontrol[^]" on a separate line. I've not seen that before, and there is no space in original text:
I'm not planning on even looking at 1000 lines of your code - I don't have the time - but I'd start by looking at creating a <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa302342.aspx">UserControl</a>[<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa302342.aspx" target="_blank" title="New Window">^</a>] rather than a generic class - they display directly.
I tried it on various screen widths, but it's only on Chrome (Version 41.0.2268.0 canary [64-bit] and Version 39.0.2171.95 m [32-Bit]) - it doesn't do it on Firefox (34.0.5) where the line breaks correctly before the "U" of "UserControl".
The only difference between the Chrome versions is that the 32Bit version breaks a character later...just to be annoying, probably! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Cannot repro on Firefox 34.0.5, but I can on Chrome 39.0.2171.95 m.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Talk to Google about their thoughts on the English language. 
I've tried playing with CSS (very, very briefly) but was unable to get it to behave as one would expect.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I assumed you did something different for Chrome than FF...
Odd though, I've never seen that before.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Most of the black magic questions are clear enough from the subject itself in the Quick Answers List, but still to report them I need to open them, scroll to the bottom of question and then click report.
Considering the amount of black magic kind of questions we seem, won't it be more usefull to add a Report button on the question list itself?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, It would be good idea. In addition to that, soon spam filters are going to work in QA also. So within few hours after question is posted, filters will be able to send them to moderation process.
Currently, these filters are working under other forums pretty well.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Good Idea 
Born To Learn
|
|
|
|
|
Yes i agree too, Really Great idea. it'll be much better to report such spam questions .
~R@JEES#
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is it will become way too easy to mark something as SPAM. And as far as I know, there is no Undo if you were to accidentally click it.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Whenever i logged in to the portal I have seen the blank space above the poll,
I think it gets filled only when we polling article of the Month,
My suggestion over here is can we fill that space using any valuable information.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have an ad-blocker enabled?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May it be that it landed into the moderation queue and afterwards the filters allowed it to be posted?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
No, it should be purely technical problem with page rendering, one of those I reported before.
For example, answered or reported question is not marked as such in a question list after page refresh, and some other things are not showing. Once I found that removing all cookies and then logging in again fix some page rendering.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov wrote: Once I found that removing all cookies and then logging in again fix some page rendering.
Oh, good to know.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
And I said "some". Not in this case. Too bad I don't know how to reproduce it. I did not even remember it the post appeared on the same computer or another one. My fault. 
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
This question was shut down recently: [^]; one of the three persons listed as the source of the shut-down has a low-rep on CP, but they do have a "Silver" rep as "Custodian" which enables them to report a message.
Unfortunately, I couldn't get to the cached version on Google in time.
I was able to recover my one "solution" on that thread using the "version" trick, but some dialogue I had in comments ... extensive, at least half-hour of my time spent on the back-and-forth ... seems unrecoverable.
While I do not mean to cast any aspersions on the contribution of the low-rep person of the three "reporters," I, once again, question the removal of threads where there are several solutions, including a solution from a top-rep person, like Sergey, and substantial dialogue between OP and others in comments. Note, however, that Sergey was one of the persons who reported the thread, even though I'm pretty sure his "solution" was written very recently.
I don't like losing what I have carefully written, and researched !
thanks, Bill
«A man will be imprisoned in a room with a door that's unlocked and opens inwards ... as long as it does not occur to him to pull rather than push» Wittgenstein
|
|
|
|
|
No problem, I have put it back.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, Sean ! You get half-an-hour extra on the elephant-ride for that when you come over.
cheers, Bill
«A man will be imprisoned in a room with a door that's unlocked and opens inwards ... as long as it does not occur to him to pull rather than push» Wittgenstein
|
|
|
|
|
 *wheeeee*
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
