|
In article editor, the browser spell checker is not enable so user is not simply able to find out if errors in typing there are.
|
|
|
|
|
The article editor doesn't have a spell checker in it. We use CKEditor which does have a spell-as-you-type checker but we haven't had a chance to get it installed and working yet.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for reply,
Here when i am writing right now the Firefox built in spell checker is working (shows type mistakes with zigzag red line under word), but in article editor it is disabled and there is no option in the UI to enable it.
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
That's because you're not using the CKEditor here. The article editor is the CKEditor, not this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I saw lots down voting for good answers and questions. Also bad comments by some of the members  .Any way to stop this.
|
|
|
|
|
If it's abusive then use the reporting flag. Otherwise you have to live with it. There are over 11 million members here so it is not easy to police everyone's behaviour.
|
|
|
|
|
if you compared the down votes on good questions and answers with up votes, you will see the effect of down votes are negligible. because of the power of high rep user up vote can neutralize several down votes. I don't see major issue with current voting system.
Maria Lopez wrote: Also bad comments by some of the members .Any way to stop this
you can report the comment as spam/abusive
|
|
|
|
|
Specifically the bit that says:
Technical discussions are welcome, but if you need specific help please use the programming forums.
Perhaps it should be a bit larger, a bit redder, and point to QA instead? The forums are a lot quieter than QA these days, and it would be easier for a beginner to have a single place to ask than to try and decide which forum he should post in?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Done
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
With a link as well! 
Perfect!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Oh well. Enjoy your plaything then. For to the QA Forums I will not venture, and perhaps the forums are quieter because members keep pointing people to QA rather than to the forums which can be a darned site more appropriate in a lot of cases.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd agree with you - which is another good reason for sending people who don't know what to do to a more general purpose area. When they do know what they are doing, they will be more aware of the focus they need to decide which forum to post in.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: When they do know what they are doing, they will be more aware of the focus they need to decide which forum to post in.
Errr, no they won't. If they are only exposed to QA, then that's all they will use. One thing I've never seen in QA is an answer telling someone to post in a forum because it's a more appropriate location. I really don't think that QA is a more appropriate location - I'm happy to join Luc Patyn in this respect.
|
|
|
|
|
When you approve articles you can report an article as being Off-topic. How's that? Doesn't the author decide the topic?
Personally I'd like to see the possibility to report an article as having an unwanted topic, such as illegal stuff like certain kinds of hacking, or my personal dislike, those interview questions. But then we would need some guidelines from the hamsters.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
(√-sh*t) 2
|
|
|
|
|
I used 'Off-topic' in cases where the content had nothing to do with CP - it wasn't a bad article, not even spam or abusive, but had nothing to do with coding. Mainly it happened with article with too much 'philosophy' in it...
However it is very rare as in most cases I use 'Extremely poor quality'...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
When I try to edit my article, its opens an editor but which dose not contain my article.
Thanks
Suvabrata
Life is all about share and care...
public class Life : ICareable,IShareable
{
// implements yours...
}
|
|
|
|
|
Could you please provide me the link to your article? I cannot see the one you mean.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I also not able to edit my article, its empty in editor panel.
link is:
[^]
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apologies for the delay. We're narrowing in on the problem. We'll keep you posted on the solution.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, Thanks for your reply 
Life is all about share and care...
public class Life : ICareable,IShareable
{
// implements yours...
}
|
|
|
|
|
Article should be all good now!
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your help its working fine...
Life is all about share and care...
public class Life : ICareable,IShareable
{
// implements yours...
}
|
|
|
|
|
Curious.
I recently applied, out of curiosity, to sign-up to Amazon's "Mechanical Turk" service: they sent me a "not you" message with a dramatic disclaimer: "Our account review criteria are proprietary and we cannot disclose the reason why an invitation to complete registration has been denied." I suspect it might have something to do with the country where I live in Asia. I mean ... surely ... whatever at Amazon that reviews applications doesn't read my Lounge posts ?
thanks, Bill
«OOP to me means only messaging, local retention and protection and hiding of state-process, and extreme late-binding of all things. » Alan Kay's clarification on what he meant by the term "Object" in "Object-Oriented Programming."
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
