|
Oh for the love of...
10 /slam head against wall.
20 GOTO 10
[Edit: looks like it was a deploy issue, not a code issue. The code's good. Will fix.]
cheers
Chris Maunder
modified 5-Nov-14 21:03pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You will die in 0 millenia.
It is accurate. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
But it is of no use to anyone.
|
|
|
|
|
I clicky clicky, but it no worky worky. IE11, W8.
|
|
|
|
|
Working fine for me. Please try again.
|
|
|
|
|
Quick, send me a notification!! 
|
|
|
|
|
Nope... still nothing... Not that important, it could be just me.
|
|
|
|
|
When you click the button are you seeing the popup warning dialog? I assume not, which suggests it's a javascript issue.
Any add-ins such as Ad blockers?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I was seeing nothing... no ad-blockers etc...
Whatever you did fixed it though, as it just worked then!!
|
|
|
|
|
I was on stack overflow for some uploadify help, and stumbled upon job or career postings. So I applied for one just as a test, and stack overflow said I was declined because I could not prove I was a programmer.
I'm really surprised that Code Project doesn't have a programmer for hire section for small code jobs, thus the name Code Project.
I think it would do quite well.
|
|
|
|
|
That's partly what the Collaboration/Testing forum ended up as.
|
|
|
|
|
OK Thanks
I thought that forum was for swindling people into working on our projects.
Just kidding but sort of truthful!
I think alot of us could use some extra cash, and a single source site like Code Project in which verification of skills and competence merged with job listings would be a smooth transaction for all parties, unless my math is wrong with total level of competence or all members.
OK, I'm done.
|
|
|
|
|
There was a jobs forum here a while back. It closed due to lack of activity.
|
|
|
|
|
Could be because a prospective employer could see how much time we waste on here? 
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
Never I saw as much truth as in this post.
|
|
|
|
|
In my settings, my membership/Account type is Standard Member Account, but it is not reflecting the same in my forum posts. It is showing a group icon.
thank you.
Link to screenshot1[^]
Link to screenshot2[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed.
Now if you could also fix your profile customisations to make your profile page readable again, that would be great.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ok Chris, Thanks a lot for such quick response. I will do the same immediately.
|
|
|
|
|
Use standard website to upload image etc as site like you have used contains ads which are NSFW.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
My Apologies.
Thanks Rohan for bringing this up. I will keep this in mind next.
|
|
|
|
|
In Quick Answers, there are some tags around such as NoEffort, IAmLazy, GimmeCode ... In my opinion, tags should be objective and indicate what the question is about, and votes are to indicate the quality of the question, so these tags are useless and should be removed.
What do you think?
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
NoEffort and GimmeCode are useful tags. IAmLazy, less so - why do I get the horrible feeling I had something to do with that one?
|
|
|
|
|
I think they are objective, because they make it clear that the question is not valid. We can then save time by not reading them.
|
|
|
|
|
No we don't. Questions should be flagged, removed or edited to make them more appropriate. I see no value in shame-tagging.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Aren't the tags free form, meaning you can tag it whatever you want? I agree that shame-tagging is wrong but you'll have a hard time enforcing this so long as tags are free-form.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
