Re: Spam would be article

Thanks787221-Dec-13 19:02

21-Dec-13 19:02

He tried many times using different accounts to promote his site on Code project, but he didn't aware that SoMad is here at Codeproject..! Big Grin | :-D

"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad

Not sure about this

Richard MacCutchan21-Dec-13 2:51

Richard MacCutchan

21-Dec-13 2:51

But the blog at http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=106051&aid=700210[^] looks a little suspect to my untrained eye.

Veni, vidi, abiit domum

Re: Not sure about this

Nelek21-Dec-13 6:40

Nelek

21-Dec-13 6:40

Your untrained eye must be correct, article is gone.

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

SEO spam

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov20-Dec-13 16:29

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov

20-Dec-13 16:29

Spam disguised as a question, no more: What is the difference between free article submission and paid submission check link and tell[^]

by

http://www.codeproject.com/Members/yashdeepsahni[^],
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=7269085[^].

Dirty business, isn't it?

—SA

Sergey A Kryukov

Re: SEO spam - not convinced.

OriginalGriff20-Dec-13 19:48

OriginalGriff

20-Dec-13 19:48

Not sure about that: I don't see anything which says he is related to the company, his other questions seem reasonable, and it is a "listings" company by the look of it. He's also been here for a couple of years.

The company may be questionable, but I'm not convinced the OP is!

Re: SEO spam - not convinced.

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov21-Dec-13 16:12

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov

21-Dec-13 16:12

Probably you are right about OP: I look at the previous, post, they had nothing like that.

—SA

Sergey A Kryukov

Spam would be article

OriginalGriff20-Dec-13 6:02

OriginalGriff

20-Dec-13 6:02

This: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=105982&aid=699926[^]
From this: http://www.codeproject.com/Members/RanRachlin[^]

Note the company in his profile, and the only link on the page...

Re: Spam would be article

Richard C Bishop20-Dec-13 9:51

Richard C Bishop

20-Dec-13 9:51

Threat eliminated.

Tip got through as article

OriginalGriff20-Dec-13 5:33

OriginalGriff

20-Dec-13 5:33

How did this qualify as an article? Accessing SSRS Reports from SharePoint Site using C#[^] Two short paragraphs and some code? It's a tip at best, surely!

Re: Tip got through as article

Richard MacCutchan20-Dec-13 7:04

Richard MacCutchan

20-Dec-13 7:04

There are far too many of these getting through, IMHO. Makes you wonder whether it is worth taking the time to review any submissions.

Veni, vidi, abiit domum

Re: Tip got through as article

Pete O'Hanlon20-Dec-13 8:29

Pete O'Hanlon

20-Dec-13 8:29

I have changed the type from article to tip.

Re: Tip got through as article

OriginalGriff20-Dec-13 8:33

OriginalGriff

20-Dec-13 8:33

I suspect I could have as well (not tried) but I'm always reluctant to edit other peoples stuff without them knowing...

Spammer?

Nelek19-Dec-13 23:57

Nelek

19-Dec-13 23:57

http://www.codeproject.com/script/Answers/MemberPosts.aspx?tab=answers&mid=8041050[^]
8 Answers:
- 3 of them are "no-Solution" (in the same question)
- the other 5 are just pointing to his own blog

The blog is for free, I supposed it is not plagiarized, it is his own blog and it is more or less related with the questions where he is answering.

Is it to be considered as Spam?

M.D.V.

Re: Spammer?

OriginalGriff20-Dec-13 0:20

OriginalGriff

20-Dec-13 0:20

A combination of "Not-an-answer" mistakes, and site driver spam.
I have deleted the spam entries.

Re: Spammer?

Nelek20-Dec-13 0:23

Nelek

20-Dec-13 0:23

Thank you Griff. I wanted to be sure about the spam condition

M.D.V.

Spam article [All Gone]

SoMad19-Dec-13 20:30

SoMad

19-Dec-13 20:30

I don't know how this got through, but let's not let it through again.
~~Member: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=10293256[^]~~
~~Article (in the queue): http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=105927&aid=658324[^]~~
~~Article (approved): How to Fix Exchange 2010 Database Dirty Shutdown With Eseutil[^]~~

And please go to the comment section and mark the posts there from other members as spam as well.
[EDIT]
In case the posts are gone, these are the three members, who posted their own spam link.
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=10456045[^]
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=8825629[^]
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=10325272[^]
[/EDIT]

Soren Madsen

"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty

modified 20-Dec-13 5:16am.

Re: Spam article.

Thomas Daniels19-Dec-13 22:48

Thomas Daniels

19-Dec-13 22:48

The members are gone, the Tip in the moderation queue is at 3 reports.

The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.

My latest article: Create an HTML5 (and JavaScript) Maze Game with a timer

My group: C# Programmers Group

Re: Spam article.

SoMad19-Dec-13 23:16

SoMad

19-Dec-13 23:16

Thanks, all gone now.

Soren Madsen

"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty

Serial plagiariser

OriginalGriff19-Dec-13 8:41

OriginalGriff

19-Dec-13 8:41

This user: http://www.codeproject.com/Members/HADRICHMEDFRED[^]
posted a would-be tip today, which was copied from MSDN. I flagged this on the article and added a comment at the bottom as normal.
But...the speed with which it was deleted made me suspicious, so I had a look at his other publications.
The first one I checked: Fetching the name of your Windows Phone 8[^]
Is copied from here: http://rayyagubyan.wordpress.com/[^]

Oh dear...

[edit]Mea culpa - it looks like it was plagiarised the other way round... thanks Richard![/edit]

modified 19-Dec-13 14:59pm.

Re: Serial plagiariser

Richard Deeming19-Dec-13 8:51

Richard Deeming

19-Dec-13 8:51

I'm not sure about that one. Assuming this[^] is the "original" article, it says it was posted on 16th November 2013. The CodeProject tip was posted on 11th November 2013.

Also, all of the "Copy Code" links in the WordPress post point to the original CodeProject tip, which is a bit of a giveaway.

In fact, it looks like all of "Ray Yagubyan"'s posts are ripped off from other sites. For example, this[^] is a direct rip-off of this article[^]. He hasn't even bothered to copy the images; they're still pointing to CodeProject. D'Oh! | :doh: