|
Hi all,
For me this is reproducible - when I try to edit the article:
Learn JavaScript Part 1 - Create a Starfield[^]
I get the 'aw snap' Chrome error. This is on a Macbook Air i7 x64, Chrome version 30.0.1599.101.
This also intermittently happens with another article I'm editing....
|
|
|
|
|
After adding an article to bookmark it should show as saved when we open same article. But its showing Bookmark instead of saved. I guess it should be saved so we know that its already bookmarked. Its creating confusion 
|
|
|
|
|
Do we really need these forums?
Adobe Technologies[^]
Regular Expressions[^]* - Clickety[^]
Same way LINQ[^]*** I think LINQ guys won't agree to close this.
Here I mentioned Regular expressions & LINQ based on very less traffic there.
*In past, that forum was useful but nowadays we could use sites like www.regular-expressions.info[^] or tools like expresso[^]**
**This software developed by CP member, below are his articles on this.
Expresso - A Tool for Building and Testing Regular Expressions[^]
The 30 Minute Regex Tutorial[^]
***For LINQ, we could use tools like LINQPad[^]
New forums for:
Opensources****(Tools like iTextSharp, etc.,)
3rd party tools****(Tools like Telerik, etc.,)
Reporting/Charting tools(SSRS, Crystal reports, Oracle reports., ZedGraph, MS Chart, NPlot, Fusion chart.,)
These new forums possibly could reduce Q/A section traffic.
UPDATE
---------
Added strike for Regular expressions forum.
UPDATE2
---------
**** - Clickety[^]
modified 13-Nov-13 7:25am.
|
|
|
|
|
We certainly need the RegEx forum. We do direct people there from forums such as C# when they ask questions there.
|
|
|
|
|
Oops, I didn't think about this angle. Agree.
|
|
|
|
|
thatraja wrote: Opensources(Tools like iTextSharp, etc.,)
We already have the Free Tools forum.
|
|
|
|
|
My mistake, I should have mentioned details clearly. What I meant is, that forum for posting questions related to Opensources(another forum for 3rd party tools).
In Q/A section, I found more than bunch of questions related to DevExpress, iTextSharp, GoogleMap, Sap, Telerik, Infragistics, Obout, and many 3rd party tools. So those two forums could reduce Q/A traffic.
|
|
|
|
|
At least DevExpress, SAP, Telerik and most of the expensive 3rd party tols have their own community and professional support included in the license cost. No need to encourage people in their stupidity, I think where professional support is available the people shall use it. Otherwise we could open a forum for any software, and Chris could start billing the SW manufacturers for running their support.
|
|
|
|
|
Fair enough, I close this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually my only thought was to reduce questions in Q/A section, pull the enquirers to forums which is CM's dream. Unfortunately I didn't think about other side of my ideas which Pete & you replied here.
Time to increase my creative thoughts & drop my garbage thoughts.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it?
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, I remember that but not recently may be 2 years ago. Not sure that's your dream but atleast you preferred 
|
|
|
|
|
But I prefer to post questions in Q/A section because of easy navigation from profile page. Besides I could bring that again in recent list by updating the question.
|
|
|
|
|
Tell us about your dreams. 
|
|
|
|
|
thatraja wrote: pull the enquirers to forums which is CM's dream.
Then why do you think he created Q&A?
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Homeworks?
Sorry Ignore that. He mentioned here[^] clearly & here my opinion[^]. But forums are more suitable for discussions. And we could see questions category-wise based on forums. Enquirer don't need to tag question if he choose right forum  . Besides I have seen only less reposts by enquirers in forums(comparing to Q/A section).
|
|
|
|
|
thatraja wrote: Enquirer don't need to tag question if he choose right forum
And how many posters every day fail to do that? The problem with a site like this is that many people only come here occasionally and never bother to read the FAQs. So we continue to try and guide them, but for everyone who listens to that advice there comes a new member who does not see it.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Was going to ask this, too 
On the other hand side he is against the custom CSS for our profile, cause it may lead to stuff like Rohan's profile[^]. But still, the custom CSS is there, and usable by people with all differences of taste.
|
|
|
|
|
Marco Bertschi wrote: Rohan's profile
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
 Should i remove that CSS? Change? Valuable suggestions please.I will gladly appreciate it.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
No, leave it, it looks quite interesting.
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: looks quite interesting
Thanks.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Should i remove that CSS? Change? Valuable suggestions please.I will gladly appreciate it.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
What I intended to say was that the Custom CSS tends to break the Site's overall style - I assume you like the style, and the profile represents what you like and fits your personality - I just picked you, because eeerr... - You know: It is an outstanding example 
On a side note: If a CSS like yours would do any harm the hamsters would already have taken care of that, and removed the Custom CSS setting. So, no need to change it from my POV.
|
|
|
|
|
My eyes! They burn!
I added this feature so members could have some fun, but you're making me regret that decision.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
