|
I've recently got big boost in author reputation. When inspecting, it seems I've got few times 100 point for publishing of an older article when I made some small editation. Actually I've just added a link to new article in the same article series to the older ones. I mean I do not remember to get the same for older edits of the same kind. Also consider the amount of work for creating new article or so just minor edit is incomparable, still they are rewarded the same. So, is it intended or is it a bug in the reputation system?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed that Smitha Vijayan really improved my latest article. Can somebody pass on a big thank you - and perhaps a bunch of ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif) ?
|
|
|
|
|
If you include a card saying the are from Nish, you'll have his eternal thanks as well.
|
|
|
|
|
It's good to have friends who always got your back for you! 
|
|
|
|
|
Consider it done.
The thank you, not the flowers from Nish.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Consider it done.
Brilliant 
|
|
|
|
|
You are welcome Espen!
And thanks again for sharing!
Regards
Smitha
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to join in - I have notices the same on O too many Articles and Tips around
Thumbs up for Smitha!
 Great job
It is a paradox that paradoxes would actually exist in reality.
That means of course that they don't exist.
However, they do!
∫(Edo )dx = Tzumer
∑k( this.Kid) k = this. ♥
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you! 
|
|
|
|
|
Me too Smitha,
I posted a thanks against the article you edited but you may not have seen it. So thank you very much for your time and effort in improving my article.
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have just uploaded an Article the status of article is pending but still it shows me views 5
how is it possible ?
Chandra Prakash Variyani
Senior Developer - Asp.Net (Vantage Points Pvt. Ltd)
|
|
|
|
|
Which article? Try and think what information you need to provide before posting your question.
Use the best guess
|
|
|
|
|
Pending articles get viewed by reviewers. We are the ones who approve or reject the articles.
|
|
|
|
|
some times it works very slow and many time it not opens the requested page
Chandra Prakash Variyani
Senior Developer - Asp.Net (Vantage Points Pvt. Ltd)
|
|
|
|
|
cpVariyani wrote: some times it works very slow
What does: your car, bicycle, computer, brain?
Use the best guess
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unnecessary.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
On the message boards it took me some time to figure out that there is an up/down arrow that is visible only when we hover over the message. It took some addition time to figure out that it can be used to vote up/down the message. In my opinion it would be better and more intuitive to use some old-school and less futuristic voting buttons (maybe thumbsup/thumbsdown icons) for example on the right side of the footer where the vote results are displayed.
|
|
|
|
|
These buttons have been here for months, I'm surprised that such an enterprising person as yourself has never noticed them. Maybe you spend too much time in the forum of the damned[^]. 
Use the best guess
|
|
|
|
|
You are right, I'm there most of the time (when we are outside the homework seasons ) but with the same frequency I'm also visiting the C++/MFC/ATL/WTL message boards too.
I noticed that the numbered (1-5) voting buttons had disappeared long ago but when I saw that some of the messages still received votes I thought that voting became the monopoly of some über-members. Recently noticed the voting buttons (a few weeks ago) and I thought this may be a problem for a lot of other users who simply don't know about their voting opportunity. Unfortunately the current buttons seem to be too hidden and even if you spot them their skin doesn't really make their function obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
pasztorpisti wrote: doesn't really make their function obvious.
It's to deter the downvoters.
Use the best guess
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting approach to keep the morale high. Unfortunately solving the problem of evil downvoters is nontrivial if not impossible. I guess it could be a bit better to give permission to downvote something only after an amount of positive contribution on the forums. Upvoting is okay as a beginner. Of course this approach assumes that promoted members behave in a less childish way.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
