|
Sanjeev Kumar wrote:
If I call webservice method 3rd time, it won't event go to web service until response of 1st or 2nd is received.
Is it possible that the web server only has 2 threads handling requests from users?
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is not on the WebService, it's on the client. On the client, check the System.Net.ServicePoint.ConnectionLimit, it defaults to 2. Does this number raises an "A-HA" on you? 
It's not the fall that kills you: it's the sudden stop - Down by Law, Jim Jamursch (1986)
|
|
|
|
|
Then, why it works with windows application?
How to check ServicePoint.ConnectionLimit in ASP Application ?
Thanks
sanjeev
|
|
|
|
|
Sanjeev Kumar wrote:
Then, why it works with windows application?
Because probably you are passing through a proxy, which only supports HTTP/1.0 forwarding, and in this case, the default connection limit is 4.
Check the documentation for ServicePointManager.DefaultPersistentConnectionLimit and ServicePointManager.DefaultNonPersistentConnectionLimit to see this difference.
Sanjeev Kumar wrote:
How to check ServicePoint.ConnectionLimit in ASP Application ?
Just print the damn thing!
It's not the fall that kills you: it's the sudden stop - Down by Law, Jim Jamursch (1986)
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I had written few articles for a major publishing company which unfortunately went out of business. I put together a website to publish these myself. The code samples are all in C#. Please check it out:
http://dotnetuser.www2.dotnetplayground.com/
Thanks
Madhuri Mittal
|
|
|
|
|
Madhuri Mittal wrote:
I had written few articles for a major publishing company which unfortunately went out of business
GlassHaus? Wrox?
Madhuri Mittal wrote:
I put together a website to publish these myself. The code samples are all in C#. Please check it out:
http://dotnetuser.www2.dotnetplayground.com/
If you want a better reaction then submit them to CP. I have not read them properly yet but from first glance they seem of high quality and would be received well here. Plus you get to say to potential employers "300k CPians say my articles rock"
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South Africa
Macbeth muttered:
I am in blood / Stepped in so far, that should I wade no more, / Returning were as tedious as go o'er
DavidW wrote:
You are totally mad. Nice.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes- Wrox, well I am considering doing it on CodeProject, but the amount of time everybody takes to publish them....I wrote these back in November 2002. Wrox decided to publish them in March and went out of business- anyways, thanks for your feedback I will definitely look into publishing them.
Madhuri Mittal
|
|
|
|
|
|
thanks- post them where you mean? Code project?
Madhuri Mittal
|
|
|
|
|
Madhuri Mittal wrote:
Code project?
Of course;)
Steve
McLenithan
Is Bert Evil?
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to write a trace with a EventLogTraceListener using a level of priority for an event like EventLogEntryType ???
By default using EventogTraceListener write trace event like info Event not like Warning or Error ? 
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all,
I've made a COM component that uses CryptAcquireContext. When I call it from VB.NET application it works perfectly, but when I try to call it from an ASP.NET web service CryptAcquireContext fails. The error is: "The system cannot find the file specified". How do I fix this error, is there some additional tag to put in Web.config file ?
Thanks in advance
Raphael Amorim Dantas Leite
VC++, VB, Java, .NET and eMbedded Programmer
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have a major problem in .Net Remoting..
I want to implement a ActiveX Control on Server Side but there seems no way out. Here is how i tried to implement it.
1) Created a form which containd the activex control
2) Implemented by a Class object inheriting System.MarshalByRefObject.
3) Created a instance of form in the class, like:
public class Class1 : System.MarshalByRefObject
{
FormControl fc = new FormControl();
}
and then tried to call it's member function on constructor.
4) on calling this object , from a server component implementing Remoting, it works fine.
5) but the problem comes now.. On implementing the client, a exception is thrown:
Unhandled Exception: System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException: Exception has
been thrown by the target of an invocation. ---> System.Threading.ThreadStateExc
eption: Could not instantiate ActiveX control '11111111-7ba3-1111-9623-1111111
bd0' because the current thread is not in a single-threaded apartment.
Please help me out.
Ashok Singh
Real Programmer's do not comment their code, if it is hard to write then it should hard to understand
|
|
|
|
|
Try putting the following attribute in your client app. Remove the [STAThread] and put [MTAThread].
[MTAThread]
static void Main()
{
Application.Run(new Form1());
}
|
|
|
|
|
These two options appear to have no affect on the appearance of status bar panels. Anyone else observed this?
Marc
Help! I'm an AI running around in someone's f*cked up universe simulator.
Sensitivity and ethnic diversity means celebrating difference, not hiding from it. - Christian Graus
Every line of code is a liability - Taka Muraoka
Microsoft deliberately adds arbitrary layers of complexity to make it difficult to deliver Windows features on non-Windows platforms--Microsoft's "Halloween files"
|
|
|
|
|
They have an effect on my system (Win2K). Maybe it depends on the oiperating system in use?
Chris Jobson
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Jobson wrote:
They have an effect on my system (Win2K).
Although I have a Win2K system I could test it on, I've never been able to get a .NET application to run on it, even after upgrading to IE 6, installing the latest service packs for a gazzillion things, etc.
I'm using XP and I specified a manifest. Maybe I'll try getting rid of the manifest. I just love the inconsistencies in XP and .NET. 
Thanks for the tip though!
Marc
Help! I'm an AI running around in someone's f*cked up universe simulator.
Sensitivity and ethnic diversity means celebrating difference, not hiding from it. - Christian Graus
Every line of code is a liability - Taka Muraoka
Microsoft deliberately adds arbitrary layers of complexity to make it difficult to deliver Windows features on non-Windows platforms--Microsoft's "Halloween files"
|
|
|
|
|
OK, they do not live happily together.
A button with FlatStyle set to FlatStyle.System does not show a bitmap. Setting it to Popup or Flat is OK, but then the transparent background doesn't match the grey sheen color of the other non-bitmapped buttons.
What is a person to do? Maybe I need to play with it some more, but while I do, is there anyone who's fixed this problem?
Marc
Help! I'm an AI running around in someone's f*cked up universe simulator.
Sensitivity and ethnic diversity means celebrating difference, not hiding from it. - Christian Graus
Every line of code is a liability - Taka Muraoka
Microsoft deliberately adds arbitrary layers of complexity to make it difficult to deliver Windows features on non-Windows platforms--Microsoft's "Halloween files"
|
|
|
|
|
Are you assigning the bitmap directly to the Image property or using an ImageList (by setting the Button's ImageList and ImageIndex properties)? I've found that if I use the Image property there's no transparent colour, but if I put the bitmap in an ImageList then I can specify the colour to be treated as transparent in the bitmap.
Good luck!
Chris Jobson
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Jobson wrote:
Are you assigning the bitmap directly to the Image property
Yes.
Chris Jobson wrote:
if I put the bitmap in an ImageList
OK, I'll give that a try. Good grief.
Thanks!
Marc
Help! I'm an AI running around in someone's f*cked up universe simulator.
Sensitivity and ethnic diversity means celebrating difference, not hiding from it. - Christian Graus
Every line of code is a liability - Taka Muraoka
Microsoft deliberately adds arbitrary layers of complexity to make it difficult to deliver Windows features on non-Windows platforms--Microsoft's "Halloween files"
|
|
|
|
|
Is there such a beast? You can create class libraries fairly easy, but is there a .NET equivelant to the old COM .EXE Server?
Kyosa Jamie Nordmeyer - Cho Dan
Portland, Oregon, USA
|
|
|
|
|
No.
Here is an excerpt from the regasm.exe implementation :
private void RegisterManagedType(Type type, string strAsmName, string strAsmCodeBase) {
...
local6 = Registry.ClassesRoot.OpenSubKey("CLSID", true).CreateSubKey(local2);
local6.SetValue("", local0);
local7 = local6.CreateSubKey("InprocServer32");
local7.SetValue("", RegistrationServices.strMsCorEEFullFileName);
local7.SetValue("ThreadingModel", "Both");
local7.SetValue("Class", type.FullName);
local7.SetValue("Assembly", strAsmName);
local7.SetValue("RuntimeVersion", local1);
if (strAsmCodeBase != null)
local7.SetValue("CodeBase", strAsmCodeBase);
local7.Close();
if (local3 != String.Empty) {
local8 = local6.CreateSubKey("ProgId");
local8.SetValue("", local3);
local8.Close();
}
local9 = local6.CreateSubKey("Implemented Categories");
local10 = local9.CreateSubKey("{62C8FE65-4EBB-45e7-B440-6E39B2CDBF29}");
local10.Close();
local9.Close();
this.EnsureManagedCategoryExists();
local6.Close();
Even if you tweak the registry keys yourself, it's likely the CCW does not provide the appropriate apartment.
|
|
|
|
|
I am trying to get a structure returned from a web service and am having a hell of a time.
I can consume the service through IE and get back my XML package just fine, but when I try the same thing in a Windows Forms client application I get an error that says there is an error in the xml file.
I can return simple types like Booleans and stuff all day in the client but not a publicly declare structure.
Paul Watson wrote:
"At the end of the day it is what you produce that counts, not how many doctorates you have on the wall."
George Carlin wrote:
"Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things."
Unknown wrote:
"I love long walks, especialy taken by those that annoy me."
Paraphrased from TMNT:
"Cricket? You have to know what a crumpet is to understand Cricket."
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, I figured out the problem... Some of my structure members were strings containing text that was encrypted and the chars returned by the encryption function must not be XML friendly.
Any ideas how to escape this?
Paul Watson wrote:
"At the end of the day it is what you produce that counts, not how many doctorates you have on the wall."
George Carlin wrote:
"Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things."
Unknown wrote:
"I love long walks, especialy taken by those that annoy me."
Paraphrased from TMNT:
"Cricket? You have to know what a crumpet is to understand Cricket."
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried wrapping the non-XML-friendly chars in a CDATA section?
<test>
<![CDATA[Offending data]]>
</test>
That might work, but then again if they are chars it might not and you will have to use a text encoder (.NET has plenty) to encode them to UTF8 or whatever your XML is set to. I think. Not my forte (encoding.)
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
Cape Town, South Africa
Macbeth muttered:
I am in blood / Stepped in so far, that should I wade no more, / Returning were as tedious as go o'er
DavidW wrote:
You are totally mad. Nice.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
